Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How was this story not widely discussed?!
1 posted on 09/13/2004 6:53:33 PM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377
How was this story not widely discussed?!

Because we don't believe a word Old Media reports?

2 posted on 09/13/2004 7:07:14 PM PDT by Peach (The Clinton's pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

I remember quite well it being discussed. It is seared, seared into my memory. Ms C Rice was being blamed far and wide for leaking the name, but a close reading of the news story showed that a senior US intelligence figure was confirming information leaked by the Pakistanis. The original divulgers, then, were Pakistanis, not Ms Rice or some other American.


3 posted on 09/13/2004 7:15:00 PM PDT by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

It was discussed widely. Too widely, really, considering that the original story makes it pretty clear that it was actually a Pakistani who leaked the name -- but the coverage blamed the Bush Administration, of course.


4 posted on 09/13/2004 7:23:22 PM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson