To: gortklattu
How did he dishonor it? By calling it a backdoor draft? By equating it with Draft Dodging? By suggesting that people in the Guard betrayed their country?
To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
We shall see what the National Guard thinks tomorrow when Bush speaks.
13 posted on
09/13/2004 6:49:56 PM PDT by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
Bush dishonored the Guard because he deserted it (by obtaining an honorable discharge from an over-manned unit after Kerry lost the war for his country) rather than defecting from it (as John Kerry did to the Navy). He was dishonorable for failing to commit treason. Heck, Bush probably could have bombed Dallas and Houston for the heck of it if he were so inclined. That would have been honorable.
Understand? Treason is honorable; serving your country according to applicable rules and regulations constitutes desertion, a heinous crime punishable by death.
To understand these truths, as Democrats call the fallacious propaganda of enemies of the United States, all one needs to do is read the thesis of TREASON by ANN COULTER. When she wrote the book, it was a hyperbole, but today it might be an understatement. What would you call a party who appoints a notorious traitor to be its presidential candidate? Certainly not a winner.
When you understand that the Democrats are the Party of Treason, propagandizing for a Traitor as their Presidential nominee, then you can interpret properly the statements made by members of that Party and identify most of its membership, even their covert allies, by their continuously seditious statements and various other lies (and their sexual promiscuity, but that's another issue for another missive).
21 posted on
09/13/2004 6:55:03 PM PDT by
dufekin
(President Kerry would have our enemies partying like it's 1969, when Kerry first committed treason.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson