Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry throws a fit-then can't provide an answer
http://www.nationalreview.com/kerry/kerryspot.asp ^

Posted on 09/13/2004 11:03:12 AM PDT by NoobRep

Complete buffoon. How could anyone justify a vote for this spineless jellyfish.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kerrykorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
MAYBE THIS IS WHY HE STOPPED DOING INTERVIEWS [09/13 10:31 AM]

John Kerry apparently did a 15-minute phone interview with the New York Times. Here is a highlight:

Mr. Kerry's basic argument, that the Iraq war has diverted attention from more dangerous nations like North Korea, is one he has often used on the campaign trail and in interviews over the past several months. But his language on Sunday, calling the situation "a nuclear nightmare" and directly accusing Mr. Bush of leaving the United States more vulnerable to North Korea, was far harsher and more incendiary than the language he has used before. It is also highly unusual for Mr. Kerry to seek out a reporter on a Sunday, when he had no public appearances scheduled, to attack Mr. Bush. This comes as Mr. Kerry and his aides, during this final 50 days of the campaign, have promised to draw more consistent and sharper contrasts to Mr. Bush in response to criticism from supporters that their message has been too weak...

When Mr. Kerry was pressed about how he would handle the threat of a North Korean nuclear test if he was in the Oval Office, he declined to be prescriptive, other than to say that the issue would probably have to be taken to the United Nations Security Council. "Hypothetical questions are not real," he said, arguing that North Korea was a case for preventive diplomacy, and that Mr. Bush's "ideologically driven" approach had kept him from truly engaging North Korea. "The Chinese are frustrated, the South Koreans, the Japanese are frustrated," he said.

All of the possibilities of what the president could face when he takes the oath of office on January 20, 2005, are hypothetical. If Kerry continues to insist, "hypothetical questions aren't real," he is basically saying he can't give American voters any idea of what he would do as President until he's sworn in.

1 posted on 09/13/2004 11:03:13 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoobRep


"Tereza, what do you mean they don't like MEEEEEEEEE?"
2 posted on 09/13/2004 11:06:31 AM PDT by gunnygail (Founding member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. (I operate the minigun, more fun):.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep
other than to say that the issue would probably have to be taken to the United Nations Security Council.

Yeah, and we all know how well that worked out with Iraq...

Taking the N Korea issue to the Security Council could very well end up with France demanding that the US dismantle its nuclear weapons and submit to inspections by North Korean government agents.

3 posted on 09/13/2004 11:06:34 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep
How could anyone justify a vote for this spineless jellyfish.

He's not Bush.

4 posted on 09/13/2004 11:07:19 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Yup! That pretty much sums up Kerry's campagin platform. V

Vote Kerry and find out what he'll do for you as president after he is elected!

That gives me warm fuzzies and makes me feel safe.NOT!

Bush by landslide in Nov.


5 posted on 09/13/2004 11:07:22 AM PDT by Americanwolf (Zell Miller for Secretary of Defense against liberals! (jeez spitballs.. now thats funny!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep
If Kerry continues to insist, "hypothetical questions aren't real," he is basically saying he can't give American voters any idea of what he would do as President until he's sworn in.

Considering what he did with his 20 years in the Senate, the safe answer is very little, except support extreme liberal legislation.

6 posted on 09/13/2004 11:07:31 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

I would love someone to ask him what he would do if he discovered he had a spine and have him go off on his 'that's a hypothetical question' riff.


7 posted on 09/13/2004 11:07:47 AM PDT by blanknoone ("New Media? Where is that?" Dan Rather aka Dem Blather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

He just thinks the idea of him as President is hypothetical. At this point, even Kerry knows he's gonna lose. I think that on Nov. 2, Bush will open the can-o-whoop-a$$ of a lifetime on John Fonda Kerry. Kerry won't break 40%, methinks.


8 posted on 09/13/2004 11:08:04 AM PDT by RockinRight (Vote early, vote often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Won't work. The UN will only go where it's safe to party and get high.


9 posted on 09/13/2004 11:08:35 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep
Hypothetical questions are not real," he said
Well, duh, Senator. They're hypothetical. How can you be nuanced and not consider every possible scenario? The problem is not that the Senator is nuanced or complex, it is that he is not nuanced or complex enough: to be decisive requires analysis and forethought--the good Senator is only capable of detailed hindsight.
10 posted on 09/13/2004 11:09:55 AM PDT by Asclepius (protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Has my cheese slid off my cracker or did North Korea not already kick the UN and Alberidi (sp) out?

Why would we expect a different result by doing the same thing again?


11 posted on 09/13/2004 11:10:18 AM PDT by IamConservative (A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Welcome to FR...good post.


12 posted on 09/13/2004 11:10:38 AM PDT by zlala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Hypothetically, Kerry served in the Senate and REPRESENTED the people of Ma. for 20 yrs.

Hypothetically.


13 posted on 09/13/2004 11:11:28 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

John Kerry is not sophisticated enough to understand that the problem of terrorism is not a sophisticated issue.


14 posted on 09/13/2004 11:12:45 AM PDT by atomicweeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Did he stomp his foot, too? He's like a spoiled, petulant crying 2 yr old - doesn't get his way, so he stomps and pouts and cries. How very presidential.


15 posted on 09/13/2004 11:12:49 AM PDT by fortunecookie (My grandparents didn't flee communism so that I could live in Kerry's Kommune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep
"How could anyone justify a vote for this spineless jellyfish."

Everywhere, everywhere, spineless jellyfish are insulted, and justifiably so.
16 posted on 09/13/2004 11:13:32 AM PDT by Chummy ("I Rather Know when I See BS." RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote for Osama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Welcome to FR Noob!


17 posted on 09/13/2004 11:13:52 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Post #47: Note to Big Brother... the Memory Hole is Officialy CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoobRep

Minor point, since you're new: When posting an article in a new thread, the actual article goes on *top*, your comments go on the *bottom*. You've got it the other way around.


18 posted on 09/13/2004 11:14:03 AM PDT by Ichneumon ("...she might as well have been a space alien." - Bill Clinton, on Hillary, "My Life", p. 182)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
What Kerry would do is not a damn thing. Kerry only supports our allies to the extent they criticize the USA. Thus, he would not lead, he would cower.

This isn't just mockery of Kerry. He is an unrepentant 60's left winger at heart. There was a great quote he gave to Russert in early Spring.

Kerry said the (alleged) U.S. atrocities in Vietnam were the unavoidable consequence of mistaken Cold War thinking. He went on to say that the same "mistakes" are now being made in the war on terror, and that the U.S. must "apologize" to many nations for this. He specifically named China as a country we must apologize to. Kerry would be an unmitigated foreign policy disaster.

19 posted on 09/13/2004 11:14:26 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

Poor Johnnie, are the big, bad awful press being mean to you again?


20 posted on 09/13/2004 11:14:28 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson