Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BATFE: Revised SAW regs as of Sept. 13, 2004
BATFE online ^ | 9/13/2004 | BATFE

Posted on 09/13/2004 6:53:03 AM PDT by Joe Brower

ATF Seal

U.S. Department of Justice

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives

 


 

Washington, DC 20226


CHANGES IN FEDERAL LAW AS OF SEPTEMBER 13, 2004
RELATING TO
SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS (SAWs)

AND

LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES (LCAFDs)

GENERAL

As of September 13, 2004, the provisions of Public Law 103-322, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, covering semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices are no longer in effect. The regulations implementing these provisions also are no longer in effect.

Specifically, there is no longer a Federal prohibition on the manufacture, transfer, and possession of semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices.

There are no longer any marking requirements for semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices. Existing markings on firearms and magazines relating to law enforcement or government use may be disregarded.

There is no longer any Federal requirement for Federal firearms licensees to obtain certain documentation before transferring semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices to government agencies or law enforcement officers. However, any records obtained prior to September 13, 1994, pertaining to the sale or transfer of semiautomatic assault weapons must still be retained for a period of 5 years. See 27 CFR § 478.129(f). Moreover, records of importation and manufacture must be maintained permanently and licensees must maintain all other acquisition and disposition records for 20 years.

Licensees who provided letters of future intent to sell semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices to law enforcement agencies and other qualified customers are no longer obligated to comply with such letters.

Anyone who illegally possessed, manufactured, or transferred semiautomatic assault weapons or large capacity ammunition feeding devices before the bans sunset still have violated the law since their possession, manufacture, or transfer was illegal at the time.

IMPORTATION

The prohibition on the importation of non-sporting firearms under 18 U.S.C. section 922(l) and 925(d)(3) still applies.

Importation of large capacity ammunition feeding devices still is covered under the Arms Export Control Act. Therefore an approved permit still is required to import large capacity magazines.

Temporary importation of semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity magazines is now lawful under the provisions of 27 CFR § 478.115(d) because temporary importations are not subject to the sporting purpose test.

Any importer who has a valid approved Form 6 import permit with a restriction related to the assault weapon ban should comply with the restriction because the weapons most likely are non-sporting.

Any importer who has a valid approved Form 6 import permit with a restriction related to large capacity ammunition feeding devices may disregard the restriction. Importers may apply for a new permit if they prefer.

ASSEMBLY OF NON-SPORTING SHOTGUNS AND SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLES FROM IMPORTED PARTS

The prohibition on assembly of non-sporting shotguns and semiautomatic rifles from imported parts as provided under 18 U.S.C. § 922(r) and 27 CFR § 478.39 still applies.

SENTENCING ENHANCEMENTS

The sentencing enhancements for using semiautomatic assault weapons in a crime of violence or drug trafficking crime no longer are in effect. Similarly, the sentencing enhancements for semiautomatic assault weapons in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines no longer are in effect.

LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS

Law enforcement officers and police departments who obtained semiautomatic assault weapons are no longer required to use such firearms only for official use.

Law enforcement officers and police departments may now sell or transfer semiautomatic assault weapons to persons who are not prohibited from receiving firearms.

Law enforcement officers and police departments may now sell or transfer large capacity ammunition feeding devices to anybody.

Signed statements that semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices will be used for official use are no longer required to be provided to Federal firearms licensees.

RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS

Federal law does not prohibit retiring law enforcement officers from keeping semiautomatic assault weapons or large capacity ammunition feeding devices.

Former law enforcement officers who received semiautomatic assault weapons on retirement may now transfer those firearms to persons who are not prohibited from receiving firearms. Transfer of large capacity ammunition feeding devices is no longer restricted.

NATIONAL FIREARMS ACT

All provisions of the National Firearms Act relating to registration and transfer of machineguns, short barreled rifles, weapons made from rifles, short barreled shotguns, weapons made from shotguns, any other weapons as defined in Title 26 U.S.C. section 5845(e), silencers, and destructive devices still apply.

Registered silencers can now be attached to semiautomatic rifles and pistols without creating a prohibited semiautomatic assault weapon.

USAS-12 and Striker12/Streetsweeper shotguns are still classified as destructive devices under ATF Rulings 94-1 and 94-2 and must be possessed and transferred in accordance with the NFA.

EFFECT ON STATE LAW

Expiration of the Federal law will not change any provisions of State law or local ordinances. Questions concerning State assault weapons restrictions should be referred to State and local authorities.

Download the PDF Version

 

 


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assaultweapons; banglist; batfe; guns; sunset
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: NYRaider
One more of Mr. Clintons legacy's gone.

True, true, so true. Now if we could just get back that missile guidance and warhead technology from China. That's going to be a little tough to fight with semi-automatic rifles.

21 posted on 09/13/2004 7:13:26 AM PDT by TigersEye (Regime change in the courts. Impeach activist judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Anyone who illegally possessed, manufactured, or transferred semiautomatic assault weapons or large capacity ammunition feeding devices before the bans sunset still have violated the law since their possession, manufacture, or transfer was illegal at the time.

Yeah, go ahead and try and prove it BATFags.

22 posted on 09/13/2004 7:15:38 AM PDT by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Fox News just said, "the ban expires later today."


23 posted on 09/13/2004 7:21:40 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

ANYBODY GOT A BELT-FED .50 CREW SERVED WEAPON FOR SALE? I'M THINKIN' A MA-DUECE, BUT I COULD BE PERSUADED OTHERWISE. OH, AND IT HAS TO BE SEMI-AUTO ONLY...


24 posted on 09/13/2004 7:25:19 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (What freakin' frequency are you on, Kenneth...NPR?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool; Cobra64
"So, it did die last night?"

Yes. Go to "awbansunset.com" for details.

"Fox News just said, 'the ban expires later today.'"

Fox news is wrong. When it comes to gun issues, they don't do much better than ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, etc., IMHO.

Also look at the way the leftmedia is raging over this in today's morning papers. It's gone, and they are having epileptic fits over it.

But hey, just to be safe, hang on for another 24 hours. We've waited ten years -- another day isn't going to matter much.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

25 posted on 09/13/2004 7:29:37 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
This is probably just scare-language from the Clintonista holdovers in the BATFE, of which there are many, as we know.

I'd really like to know how they intend to prove such a thing. Of course, they don't have to in order to make your life miserable regardless.

Neat how it works, isn't it?

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

26 posted on 09/13/2004 7:31:09 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
That's going to be a little tough to fight with semi-automatic rifles

Even MORE challenging with spitballs from Kerry's Pentagon priorities...

27 posted on 09/13/2004 7:44:24 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
This also jumped out at me:

Former law enforcement officers who received semiautomatic assault weapons on retirement may now transfer those firearms to persons who are not prohibited from receiving firearms.

Since when are retired LEOs receiving semiautos on retirement? News to me. Why?

28 posted on 09/13/2004 7:45:09 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Anyone who illegally possessed, manufactured, or transferred semiautomatic assault weapons or large capacity ammunition feeding devices before the bans sunset still have violated the law since their possession, manufacture, or transfer was illegal at the time.



Thus, anyone currently possessing what yesterday was illegal would be well advised to arrange a sales transaction with a paper trail showing it is newly acquired today. (And I sure hope it had been purchased in a private sale, and not from a dealer with all the ATF paperwork.)


29 posted on 09/13/2004 7:45:35 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

ANYBODY GOT A BELT-FED .50 CREW SERVED WEAPON FOR SALE? I'M THINKIN' A MA-DUECE, BUT I COULD BE PERSUADED OTHERWISE. OH, AND IT HAS TO BE SEMI-AUTO ONLY...



http://tnwfirearms.com/


30 posted on 09/13/2004 7:47:11 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
There are no longer any marking requirements for semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices. Existing markings on firearms and magazines relating to law enforcement or government use may be disregarded.

I'll bet that before the gun shows are over this weekend, some stupid and/or lying/greedy gun dealer will try to say that the LEO marked mags are still illegal to sell to private individuals (but he could sell you these genuine pre-ban mags for twice the going rate).

31 posted on 09/13/2004 7:52:57 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
News to me too. Maybe they're talking about those fancy gold-inlaid laser-engraved too-pretty-to-shoot things that you see for sale in "American Rifleman". $;-)
32 posted on 09/13/2004 8:00:22 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

BTTT


33 posted on 09/13/2004 8:04:38 AM PDT by in the Arena (James Wayne Herrick, Jr. Captain/US Air Force - MIA - Laos - 27 October 1969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
Unfortunately, Boxer will be around for another six years.

How old is she getting to be? Maybe there is hope after all.

34 posted on 09/13/2004 8:07:17 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Anyone who illegally possessed, manufactured, or transferred semiautomatic assault weapons or large capacity ammunition feeding devices before the bans sunset still have violated the law since their possession, manufacture, or transfer was illegal at the time.

Amazing. If you had it when it was legal, and they make it illegal, then that is a crime. If you had it while it was illegal, and then they make it legal, then THAT is still a crime.

Anyone see any problems with this kinda logic?

35 posted on 09/13/2004 8:15:12 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

My order from Bushmaster is already shipped in UPS tracking says it will arrive Wednesday. YEEHAW!


36 posted on 09/13/2004 8:15:41 AM PDT by RKV (RKV (He who has the guns, makes the rules))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; All
Fox news is wrong. When it comes to gun issues, they don't do much better than ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, etc., IMHO.

Also look at the way the leftmedia is raging over this in today's morning papers. It's gone, and they are having epileptic fits over it.

Just saw Fox broadcasting another of Lurch's lies. HorseFace was accusing Bush of not passing an extension of the AWB. Well, it seems that Congress did not put a Bill on his desk for him to even sign!!!

I am going to send emails to Fox, Rush and Sean mentioning this little 'detail'. Hope some of you would start a new thread mentioning this. (I don't know how to post a thread).

37 posted on 09/13/2004 8:27:31 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

I couldn't get the link to work. It just says the document is not available on this server...


38 posted on 09/13/2004 8:28:11 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Rant this day, in remembrance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Just right click on the link at the upper left, click on 'save target as', and you are good to go!


39 posted on 09/13/2004 8:30:21 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Rant this day, in remembrance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
The Second Amendment...
America's Original Homeland Security!

Be Ever Vigilant!

40 posted on 09/13/2004 8:37:21 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson