Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jerry B. Killian Update--the six alleged memos at USA Today are there for a reason
USA Today ^ | 9/12/2004 | Daniel

Posted on 09/12/2004 8:37:49 PM PDT by charleston1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 09/12/2004 8:37:49 PM PDT by charleston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: charleston1

Good work


2 posted on 09/12/2004 8:40:32 PM PDT by Boxcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

Sorry, I stopped reading USA Today when that paper ended up becoming with bad journalism, USSR Today!!!!:-(


3 posted on 09/12/2004 8:40:51 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

hmmm a member since 9/11/04.


4 posted on 09/12/2004 8:41:58 PM PDT by sitkaspruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defender2

Actually it goes to washington monthly(gag) although it says usa today.


5 posted on 09/12/2004 8:42:13 PM PDT by aft_lizard (I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

USA Today is holding on to the other two documents until their graphic designers can come up with a more convincing font and character spacing.


6 posted on 09/12/2004 8:43:25 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sitkaspruce

The length of my membership here is not a relevant issue to the facts I have presented.


7 posted on 09/12/2004 8:43:38 PM PDT by charleston1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

Thank you for continuing to keep this in the forefront. It should be more readily known that these extra two are like the forger who practices signatures and throws the practice ones into the wastebasket - ready for Hercule Poirot to find.


8 posted on 09/12/2004 8:45:06 PM PDT by Socratic (Kerry/Edwards - Forging a New Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

USA Today should tell us who their source is.


9 posted on 09/12/2004 8:46:35 PM PDT by igoramus987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

I concur - FR has been overrun of late with DU shills making wild statements - I for one appreciate your investigative efforts to get at the truth


10 posted on 09/12/2004 8:46:49 PM PDT by VRWCTexan (History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

Followed that today. Hell of a first post!


11 posted on 09/12/2004 8:47:02 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: igoramus987

Maybe a simple phone call on Monday morning to the editor?


12 posted on 09/12/2004 8:47:43 PM PDT by VRWCTexan (History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sitkaspruce

>>>hmmm a member since 9/11/04.

Not every newbie is a troll, however, most trolls are also newbies...


13 posted on 09/12/2004 8:49:25 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it.......up.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

Welcome to Free Republic.


14 posted on 09/12/2004 8:49:35 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

It has been speculated that the other memos were not passed on because they don't really support the whole premise that CBS was trying to to make, that Bush had not received a review or something. Anyway, they were supposed to have been contradictory in some way. They also bring into question another name, the guy who was supposed to have done the review, Harris, I think was the name (not really sure).


15 posted on 09/12/2004 8:50:20 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/document.htm

Are these what we're talking about?


16 posted on 09/12/2004 8:50:54 PM PDT by amom (THANK YOU and WELCOME HOME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Keith in Iowa

Maybe so, but there have been an amazing number of folks signing up here in the past several days that have been posting threads seemingly just to generate traffic back to their own blog (man, how I've grown to hate that friggin' word over the past year) sites.


18 posted on 09/12/2004 8:57:56 PM PDT by MrConfettiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: amom
Killian Docs
19 posted on 09/12/2004 8:58:44 PM PDT by Jeff Blogworthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sitkaspruce

I have the download. He is right about there being 6 documents.


20 posted on 09/12/2004 9:00:59 PM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson