Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alabama woman says she lost job for sporting Kerry sticker on car
Decatur Daily ^ | 9/12/2004 | Clyde L. Stancil

Posted on 09/12/2004 4:54:10 PM PDT by GeorgiaFreeper

MOULTON — Lynne Gobbell never imagined the cost of a John Kerry-John Edwards bumper sticker could run so high.

DAILY Photo by Clyde Stancil Lynne Gobbell said her boss fired her last week because of the Kerry-Edwards campaign sticker on the back of her car. Gobbell of Moulton didn't pay a cent for the sticker that she proudly displays on the rear windshield of her Chevrolet Lumina, but said it cost her job at a local factory after it angered her boss, Phil Gaddis.

Gaddis, a Decatur bankruptcy attorney, owns Enviromate, a cellulose insulation company in Moulton.

Gaddis did not return phone calls from THE DAILY about the alleged Thursday firing.

Gobbell said she consulted a lawyer, but then changed her mind about going to see him. She said she has cried about the incident and must do without income for three weeks while the state unemployment commission decides if she is eligible for compensation.

(Excerpt) Read more at decaturdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: kerry; stupiddemocrat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-312 next last
To: worrywart
Alabama is an at-will employment state.

I'm glad someone on this thread finally raised this point. In Alabama or any other employment at will state, employees may be fired at any time for any reason or no reason.

I am licensed to practice law in AL and I advise my clients who want to fire employees just to say "you're fired" and not give a reason. That just leads to arguments over whether firing is in fact justified (same thing applies when one cancels a contract, just cancel it, don't give a reason unless you have to.

There are exceptions of course: one may not be fired for race, sex, religion, or age (above 40). Again, that's why I advise to just fire with no reason given. What the employer gives as a reason may later be interpreted as evidence that the real reason was he wanted to get rid of employee for an impermissible reason. For example, saying to an employee over 40, "Joe, you are just too tired these days" or "we need some fresh blood in here" is evidence of age discrimination. A lot of employers don't take that advice, however, they feel it's too cold to just fire with no reason. Those employers may become known as "the defendant."

BTW, the lawyer this woman consulted was right not to take the case. Now that she has come out and declared that she was fired for political reasons she has no case. If she had claimed that she was fired because she is a woman, she might have had a case. Now she can be a RAT martyr, but she won't win a lawsuit in AL.

101 posted on 09/12/2004 6:37:13 PM PDT by Martin Tell (I will not be terrified or Kerrified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Put down the crack pipe.

The employer was not interfering in that poor, stoopid woman's right to vote or her rights of free speech. The law you were referring to would have no basis in this case.
102 posted on 09/12/2004 6:38:10 PM PDT by GeorgiaFreeper (Hitlery does not have fat ankles. That's where the hooves show through above the foot prosthetics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaFreeper

Maybe John Edwards will represent her! He seems to love helping such challenged people.


103 posted on 09/12/2004 6:39:01 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes

Maybe the company is just trying to get her lard @ss off of their insurance policy and this is just a good excuse.


104 posted on 09/12/2004 6:39:11 PM PDT by GeorgiaFreeper (Hitlery does not have fat ankles. That's where the hooves show through above the foot prosthetics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Who ever made the ruling erred. Also, a fed prosecutor is the one that's supposed to represent such a person in fed court. The firing amounted to intimidation, unless the org doing the firing was a political outfit.

See the link in #96.

"(5) any citizen because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such citizen or any other citizen from lawfully aiding or encouraging other persons to participate, without discrimination on account of race, color, religion or national origin, in any of the benefits or activities described in subparagraphs (1)(A) through (1)(E) or subparagraphs (2)(A) through (2)(F), "or participating lawfully in speech or peaceful assembly opposing any denial of the opportunity to so participate - shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation...xtra ajil time... "

105 posted on 09/12/2004 6:40:56 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

c-BS


106 posted on 09/12/2004 6:42:28 PM PDT by GeorgiaFreeper (Hitlery does not have fat ankles. That's where the hooves show through above the foot prosthetics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaFreeper

"typical dem doesn't even think about looking for another job....."

You read my mind.


107 posted on 09/12/2004 6:42:59 PM PDT by joedownthestreet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaFreeper
"The employer was not interfering in that poor, stoopid woman's right to vote or her rights of free speech. The law you were referring to would have no basis in this case."

You can explain why of course, w/o resorting to crack pipes.

108 posted on 09/12/2004 6:43:35 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaFreeper
"c-BS"

Code for haven't got a clue? Post your reasons.

109 posted on 09/12/2004 6:46:17 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: worrywart

And she didn't even PAY for the sticker ;)


110 posted on 09/12/2004 6:46:41 PM PDT by JENINMO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Please read the news report carefully. NO WHERE did it mention the employer stated "if you vote for Kerry, you are fired".

According to the news story she stated "We were going back to work from break, and my manager told me that Phil said to remove the sticker off my car or I was fired," she said. "I told him that Phil couldn't tell me who to vote for. He said, 'Go tell him.' " .

How was her right to vote impinged?
111 posted on 09/12/2004 6:50:24 PM PDT by GeorgiaFreeper (Hitlery does not have fat ankles. That's where the hooves show through above the foot prosthetics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaFreeper
Gobbell said she consulted a lawyer, but then changed her mind about going to see him.

This says it all. Something stinks.
112 posted on 09/12/2004 6:51:24 PM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

LOST HER JOB? i'D SAY THE DITZY BROAD GOT OFF EASY. iMAGINE THE STUPIDITY OF A KERRY STICKER IN THE SOUTH!


113 posted on 09/12/2004 6:51:34 PM PDT by Wardawg (Hanoi John Forgery Kerry was here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #114 Removed by Moderator

To: doc30

> I'm definitely NOT a Kerry supporter, but firing someone over a political sticker, democrat or republican, is a bit over the top. <

Yep. Whether it's legal or not, it's appalling to fire someone because they happen sport a bumper sticker that you disagree with.

Why do I have the feeling that it someone was fired for having an NRA sticker on their car, the amen chorus here would be frothing at the mouth in outrage.


115 posted on 09/12/2004 6:52:28 PM PDT by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

She was fired for not removing the offensive material "the sticker" from the employer's property and was insolent about it.


116 posted on 09/12/2004 6:53:09 PM PDT by GeorgiaFreeper (Hitlery does not have fat ankles. That's where the hooves show through above the foot prosthetics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I'll pass. I think she was looking for a fight and while its [sic] his business and he makes the rules, I won't do business with folks who try to abridge political speech.

Like John McCain for instance.

1) It's probably not true.
2) The First Amendment only guarantees that Congress has no authority to abridge freedom of speech. It says nothing about private individuals, who are entitled to fire anyone they want, any time, for any reason. Any law attempting to censure this employer for that reason is in fact abridging the employer's rights to free association, private property, and much else.

So, right you are about McCain, and wrong about this employer.

117 posted on 09/12/2004 6:56:29 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Wearing BLACK Pajamas, in honor of Hanoi John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaFreeper

Hey, maybe she can get a job with the Kerry campaign. I hear they're hiring.


118 posted on 09/12/2004 6:57:01 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaFreeper
"Please read the news report carefully. NO WHERE did it mention the employer stated "if you vote for Kerry, you are fired". "

THe title of the Article, "Alabama woman says she lost job for sporting Kerry sticker on car" is an accusation of a fed crime. The employer now has to defend himself. I told you if I was a fed prosecutor, I'd look in to it. This sort of thing went on in the past a lot more than it does now. It was one of the rats favorite wways of operating. It's evil.

119 posted on 09/12/2004 6:57:21 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: doc30

It looks like she is trying to set up a false termination claim. How is an employer supposed to defend against a lie in the public media. If they comment on the real reason she was fired they have real liability.

Let her have her unemployment check and 15 minutes. The lawyer was smart not to talk to the media. If she does sue, her employer need only demonstrate a legit reason for her termination and she is toast. She can be held liable for all court costs and if the claim is deemed frivilous her AND HER LAWYER can be held for attorney's fees.

Is her state a right to work state?


120 posted on 09/12/2004 6:57:42 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-312 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson