To: Brilliant
From Rather's Friday transcript:
"These questions grew out of new witnesses and new evidence including documents written by Lieutenant Bush's squadron commander."
I agree on the docs of course.
The bigger point is that Gunga Dan is claiming "new" (never came forward before) "witnesses" (saw actual events).
Jim Moore is not a witness to anything--he's a hack author.
Burkett may or may not be a witness, but he's not new.
I can't even name ONE new witness, let alone TWO. Hodges, who was misled anyway, is not a "witness." He only said "that sounds right." Strong is also not a witness.
Dan has essentially been saying (among many other things) that even if the docs are forged, there's plenty of corroboration. FROM FREAKING WHERE?
To: litany_of_lies
Glad you re-introduced this thread. It pays to remind some doltist "journalists" who lurk FR of the long history of some of these whack-jobs on the left.
Nam Vet
6 posted on
09/12/2004 9:41:22 AM PDT by
Nam Vet
(I couldn't live a day without my VRWC Decoder Ring)
To: litany_of_lies
Dan has essentially been saying (among many other things) that even if the docs are forged, there's plenty of corroboration. FROM FREAKING WHERE?
Dandy Dan appears to be basing the bulk of his corroboration claims on the statements of Matlin, who only claimed that Killian's signature appeared authentic. Blather has (as we know) steadfastly ignored, stonewalled and demagogued the whole typeface, superscript and kerning questions associated with the docs, the content issues associated with the docs, the refutation by Killian's surviving family of the docs, and the allegation of politicking by Ben Barnes' daughter. So, when you ignore everything else and you have one hack who claims the signatures match, there's your "plenty of corroboration".
8 posted on
09/12/2004 9:44:14 AM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Repeal CFR NOW!!)
To: litany_of_lies
Dan has essentially been saying (among many other things) that even if the docs are forged, there's plenty of corroboration. FROM FREAKING WHERE? From Dan's overactive imagination.
Here's a nice place for Dan to retire to.
![](http://www.lyndonirwin.com/asylum1.jpg)
Since Dan has such a creative imagination, he shouldn't be bothered by the fact that the Asylum was torn down in 1999. He can pretend it is there or he can use this picture.
9 posted on
09/12/2004 9:52:26 AM PDT by
syriacus
(Kerry lied, while honorable men died. Benedict Arnold REALLY was a war hero before he was a traitor.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson