[FesterUSMC]

give a link

[counterpunch]

some URLs would be helpful.

[aft_lizard]

links!

[sitetest]

Find here:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-09-09bushdocs.pdf

[chemical_boy]

http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-02-14-bush-docs.htm

bottom of the page, the "see the memos" link

[charleston1]

I tried to link to the article but must have screwed up because the USA Today was rejected. Anyway now that the thread is up.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/2004-02-14-bush-docs.htm

[WHBates]

I can certainly understand why these two additional documents did not make the "60 Minutes" cut.

And that would be????? It's your thread.

[WHBates]

I can certainly understand why these two additional documents did not make the "60 Minutes" cut.

And that would be????? It's your thread.

[faithincowboys]

What are your observations???

[Dog]

Signed up today......hmmmm.

Why do you think we should see these "practice" letters?

[opinionator]

Kerry/Edwa^rds

[MaryFromMichigan]

Hi!

Welcome to FR!

You may find this post useful:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1213319/posts

Glad you found your way here!

[deport]

Welcome to FR..... hope you enjoy the forum

Now what is it about these documents that you think caused them from being included in the CBS story?

[CWOJackson]

I'm waiting for the Colonel Killian memos praising John Kerry and proclaiming that one day Kerry would make a great president.

[Boundless]

And how do we know these haven't been altered, or
completely re-forged, since CBS was caught out of
school earlier this week?

[NavySEAL F-16]

The dates are still not in military style. When will they ever learn?

[moonman]

When did the late Lt. Colonel Jerry B. Killian retire from the military. I keep hearing conflicting stories. One being, that he retired in 1972 and would have had no dealings with the pilots in 1973.

[not too stupid]

Did you notice the letterhead on aug 72 memo. its superscripted. this is inconsistent with all the other letterheads. Plus the dates have commas between the month and year. This would not have been done by a military member.

[dano1]

For the life of me I can't understand why we are even talking about documents which are unsigned. (Several of the original four supposed memos don't even bear Killian's signature.)

I always thought a memo to the file or correspondence had to be signed to be official. IMHO, an unsigned typed document is just a meaningless piece of paper. It's not an official record.

Thanks for the heads up on the other documents.

[demkicker]

Here is another au th entic document Dan found: