The "About ACSA" page at the American Computer Scientists Association Inc. (ACSA) site seems legitimate. The article you posted describes some of the scenarios discussed here at TM. The multi-pronged attack is what we expect. Planning and organization to execute the attacks described in the article would require a high level of sophistication. The justification for the dates is well thought out and makes sense. I think it is a credible analysis. I agree that it's an interesting site. Thanks for sharing it.
http://www.ds-osac.org/view.cfm?key=7E4351404A52&type=2B170C1E0A3A0F162820
Israel May Not Be Able to Destroy Nukes
from Associated Press on Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Article ID: D154297
By PETER ENAV
JERUSALEM - Israel would not be able to destroy Iran's nuclear installations with a single air strike as it did in Iraq in 1981 because they are scattered or hidden and intelligence is weak, Israeli and foreign analysts say.
Israeli leaders have implied they might use force against Iran if international diplomatic efforts or the threat of sanctions fail to stop Iran from producing nuclear weapons.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said this month Israel is "taking measures to defend itself" a comment that raised concern Israel is considering a pre-emptive strike along the lines of its 1981 bombing of an unfinished Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak near Baghdad.
Speculation has also been fueled by recent Israeli weapons acquisitions, including bunker-buster bombs and long-range fighter-bombers.
Israel's national security adviser, Giora Eiland, was quoted Monday by the Maariv daily as saying Iran will reach the "point of no return" in its nuclear weapons program by November rather than next year as Israeli military officials said earlier. (snipped)