Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What was the standard font in the Texas Air National Guard were supposedly produced?
self

Posted on 09/10/2004 10:26:10 PM PDT by airedale

What was the standard font in the Texas Air National Guard and the US military at the time the Rather notes?

Bureaucracies tend to standardize things like type fonts. They purchase exactly the same thing for each typewriter. They might buy several sized of fonts but it's pretty much going to be the same font. Occasionally someone in a PR or Flag Officers staff might buy a special type font, but that would be unusual.

What was the standard type font balls ordered by the Texas Air National Guard and provided to their units for the IBM Selectric. What was the standard type face ordered for the other electric typewriters at the time and for the period preceding the supposed typing date of these documents?

I seem to remember it was PICA or Elite. The Elite was the smaller of the two at 12 characters per inch and PICA was 10 to an inch. I seem to remember what we used was PICA. I don’t remember what font ball we used when we got our first IBM Selectrics, but the same for all of our machines and the Captain’s yeoman (the leading chief on my ship and in the various Naval Units) had a couple of extra fonts for very special use and they were kept locked up. He didn’t want to loose them. The type font specifications would be in one of the yeoman manuals of the time for the Navy. Probably Yeoman 3 and 2 and if not there in the Yeoman 1. I’d be surprised if it hadn’t been covered by the time you got to Chief. It was probably covered in A school. I’m sure the Texas Air National Guard had similar training manuals for the people filling the same job as a Naval Yeoman even if it was the US Air Force manuals.

Any Yeoman out there that were in the Navy or the equivalent in the Air Force that know the answer?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: ratherforgeries
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2004 10:26:11 PM PDT by airedale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: airedale

Times New PICA?


2 posted on 09/10/2004 10:27:07 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Thank you Rush Limbaugh-godfather of the New Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: quasiinrem

quasiinrem is a newbie, Since August 10, 2004.

We have to keep that in mind while discussing this.


4 posted on 09/10/2004 10:35:36 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: airedale

If I remember rightly, typewriters with 12-point type mostly used Elite or Courier while those using 10-point used Pica.


5 posted on 09/10/2004 10:35:42 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airedale
This is a guess: Pica or Elite.

And IIRC (19 years old in 1970), they were called typefaces.

I suppose it depended on what typewriter the Personnel Clerk, Yeoman, etc., had, or what the CO's secretary had (Underwood, IBM, etc.).
6 posted on 09/10/2004 10:35:44 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko (Oh, and Dick Cheney too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airedale

It wouldnt be TANG standards, it would be USAF standards. The ANG is part of the USAF, their paperwork and pay comes from the USAF.


7 posted on 09/10/2004 10:36:14 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked (Another military family for Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quasiinrem

quasiinrem
Since Aug 10, 2004

Nice try Troll. Since Democrats are experts in document forgery why should anyone trust the illegible document you posted?

PresidentFelon


8 posted on 09/10/2004 10:36:25 PM PDT by PresidentFelon (Reuters Reporter Adam Entous beats his mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quasiinrem
Why couldn't Killian have used this typewriter to make those docs?

According to his widow, Killian didn't type.

9 posted on 09/10/2004 10:37:54 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: airedale

Typed on an Apple I PC.

Too bad they weren't invented until 1976.

Liberal bias is one thing but down right lies from the media is unforgivable.


10 posted on 09/10/2004 10:46:32 PM PDT by Calamari (Pass enough laws and everyone is guilty of something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airedale
Courtesy of Selectric.org


11 posted on 09/10/2004 10:50:03 PM PDT by Bogey78O (John Kerry: Better than Ted Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airedale
Killian's outfit did not necessarily use a changeable-type typewriter, just an "aging typewriter" that his secretary used.

Killian's office details

12 posted on 09/10/2004 10:50:12 PM PDT by fat city (Julius Rosenberg's soviet code name was "Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

My memory says that the standard type face on the Selectric balls was Courier. I looked it up on the internet and found that it's the same type face as PICA per: http://www.nightshadebooks.com/discus/messages/378/2488.html?1088636533 in a note by Iron James May 26, 2004 6:56 a.m. These people are really into editing and publishing.

"Ellen, Courier has been the standard forever. Long before twenty years ago. It was standard well before I started writing. It's the same font as typewriter Pica, and serves all the functions of Pica. And to be honest, it's difficult to find guidelines that don't mention Courier 12. "

My bet is that the majority of the typewriters regardless of type at the time these letters were supposed to be written were done in Courier/PICA. I converted this to New Courier and it sure looked familiar. I’d use that type face and compare it to other authentic documents from the same period at the Texas Air National Guard.


13 posted on 09/10/2004 10:50:51 PM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

Wow. It's clear that the IBM typewriter has the letters at different heights, and doesn't "kern" the "fo" in "fox", like the MS WORD does.


14 posted on 09/10/2004 10:53:07 PM PDT by BushMeister ("We are a nation that has a government - not the other way around." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fat city

OK, then it probably means that her typewriter is PICA and if those documents are in other than PICA or Courier then they are probably forgeries. Take a look at the commas, quotation marks, apostrophes etc. In Courier they have a very different look from Times New Roman. They are more like straight lines running on an angle then the curved look of New Times Roman.


15 posted on 09/10/2004 10:56:39 PM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked

The services follow DOD document standards. Courier 10-pitch and standard pica were acceptable. Even the State Department *just* (01 February 2004) changed from Courier to Times New Roman.


16 posted on 09/10/2004 11:00:31 PM PDT by ProxyAccount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: airedale
I don't remember about makes and fonts etc, but I'd bet the farm that a GUARD unit did not have a $10,000 IBM typewriter that might do superscripting and spacing circa 1970. If anyone in the military--at the time--had those rare, top of the line models--they would have been at the Pentagon, not at a GUARD/RESERVE unit in Texas or Alabama.
17 posted on 09/10/2004 11:10:42 PM PDT by CharlieChan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlieChan

Go ask a Guard guy when they finally started seeing computers arrive in their unit...it probably wasn't until 1995. Most active duty units had computer by 1989. If your unit wanted a CPU that was capable of doing classified work...it was $15k for the CPU, monitor and printer. Most units had to beg to get that kinda money.


18 posted on 09/10/2004 11:15:15 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CharlieChan

The IBM Selectric Composer which did have those capability was for publishing use only it wasn't anything that would show up anywhere outside that specialized area. Not only would they be exceptionally costly to purchase but they'd have to have special maintenance contracts. I can't believe that the ordinary IBM repair tech ever saw one let alone was able to repair one of the IBM Selectric Composers.


19 posted on 09/10/2004 11:23:02 PM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: airedale
Whenever I post on a thread about this story I like to use a monospace font. Even if I don't have anything in particular to add to the discussion.
20 posted on 09/10/2004 11:26:26 PM PDT by spodefly (I've posted nothing but BTTT over 1000 times!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson