Blather will have his "expert" say that the forged documents "could have been produced" in 1972.
Then Blather will spend the next 59 minutes talking about how Bush is a traitor to the country because he coordinated with the Communists while the country was at war....oh that was Kerry....well, your get my point.
Then Blather will sit tight and wait for the issue to blow over.
Notice how the MSM is NOT SAYING THE MILITARY TYPEWRITERS COULD DO THIS! just some thing some place at some time in THEORY could do that.
A smiple Freedom of Information act request could EASILY reveal what typewriters existed at that military base.
I saw Rather's piece tonite. He put up a superscript from a typewriter of the time next to the superscript from the document. They didn't look even remotely similar. I can't believe that they would be so sloppy or arrogant as to put that up as proof! The superscript from the typewriter was at the bottom of the line rather than the top and was much larger.
The whole report was incredibly biased and one-sided. No one put on from the other side, no discussion of the numerous other problems with the documents. A handwriting expert who claimed the signature was Killian's when any fool knows that signatures can either be forged or photocopied onto a document! Rather admitted that CBS received photocopies of the documents and not originals. He also sounded hoarse, like he had been shouting all day.
If there's any shred of integrity left at CBS he'll be gone by this time next week.