Skip to comments.
RATHER DIGS IN: THE DOCUMENTS ARE AUTHENTIC
Drudgereport ^
| 9/10/04
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 09/10/2004 10:11:53 AM PDT by Pfesser
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
To: Pfesser
Rather is certifiable. (Not that that's news.)
Hopefully this will finally bring about his end.
To: Pfesser
that more important questions than how we got the story, which is where those who don't like the story like to put the emphasis, the more important question is what are the answers to the questions raised in the story, But Dan, if the documents are forgeries, then there are no questions to be answered, other than WHO PROVIDED THE FORGED DOCUMENTS!
To: BunnySlippers
What preponderance?! They consulted one alleged and nameless doc expert, and called some guy who knew Killian and read the memos over the phone to him. Oh, real investigative journalism there all right. NOT.
23
posted on
09/10/2004 10:17:07 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: rhombus
I heard the interview on Rush and Rather sounded like a Dem flack--"Bush needs to answer these questions.." and so forth. He has been totally exposed.
24
posted on
09/10/2004 10:17:09 AM PDT
by
Callahan
To: Pfesser
I believe CBS and Rather released the fake documents KNOWING they were probably fake, just to take the spotlight away from the POW Vietnam Vets, who released their documentary DVD this week showing Kerry's 1971 speech before the US Senate really did harm POWS in Vietnam.
That's the way things work.
25
posted on
09/10/2004 10:17:29 AM PDT
by
Edit35
To: Pfesser
Dan Blather speaks with forked tongue.
26
posted on
09/10/2004 10:17:29 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: ArrogantBustard
27
posted on
09/10/2004 10:18:09 AM PDT
by
Chieftain
(Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
To: Pfesser
This will be the official spin from CBS
"We don't know whether the documents are forged or not. We are still investigating. But we were wrong to release them without verifying completely and we are sorry for that".
This way, they don't accept responsibility and they can just hope for another story like a hurricane to divert our attention.
28
posted on
09/10/2004 10:18:11 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: The G Man
Rush also mentioned the relationship between Dan Rather's daughter Robin and Ben Barnes (interviewed by Rather on 60 Minutes) and their Demoncrat fundraising activities in Austin, Texas.
Robin Rather
Ben Barnes
Was Robin Rather and/or Ben Barnes the source of the forged documents?
29
posted on
09/10/2004 10:18:27 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
His opinion over Bush is letting him overlook anything else, what tunnel vision. They're FAKE DOCUMENTS Rather!
30
posted on
09/10/2004 10:18:35 AM PDT
by
Legion04
To: the_Watchman
To: Pfesser
"I know that this story is true. I believe that the witnesses and the documents are authentic."
"know" != "believe".
God, Dan Rather is an idiot!
32
posted on
09/10/2004 10:18:52 AM PDT
by
Blzbba
(John F'in Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
To: Pfesser; Poohbah; Howlin; Buckhead; lowbridge
Bwah hahahahahaha
Go check out drudge and look at the Headline on the Rather story. heheheheh Oh gawd, this is the most fun I've had since I ran naked with the hogs through church services.
33
posted on
09/10/2004 10:18:55 AM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
To: Pfesser
Produce the originals, Mr. Ra
ther.
Produce your "experts" Mr. Rather.
Or would you rather not?
To: Pfesser
Hey, Kenneth! Fish that swallow the hook usually die having it extracted.
35
posted on
09/10/2004 10:19:15 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Pfesser
To: BunnySlippers
Expect CBS to adopt the Tawanna Brawley defense, "what matters is that it could have happened."
37
posted on
09/10/2004 10:19:30 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
To: Pfesser
"...and that more important questions than how we got the story, which is where those who don't like the story like to put the emphasis, the more important question is what are the answers to the questions raised in the story,..."
Um... I thought the main questions being raised went to the authenticity of the documents. And if they're not authentic, then the "questions raised in the story" are meaningless.
38
posted on
09/10/2004 10:19:30 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi)
To: Pfesser
...more important questions than how we got the story...What could be more important than the integrity of your research Dan?
The "how" is the story, moron...
39
posted on
09/10/2004 10:19:31 AM PDT
by
Damocles
(sword of...)
To: Pfesser
That means they came from McAuliffe. Faced with a choice of sticking the Democratic Party with a new Watergate or trying to brazen it out, CBS is choosing the slightly more palatable short-run option.
In the long-run, it will demote the network to be on a par the WB and Paramount.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson