Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Guard Memos Questioned
CBS ^ | 9-10-04 | rdl6989

Posted on 09/10/2004 9:38:24 AM PDT by rdl6989

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Doctor Stochastic

Self Correction: (Available on some IBM selectrics): that's 2000 not 1992.


21 posted on 09/10/2004 10:24:58 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
"This report was not based solely on recovered documents, but rather on a preponderance of evidence, including documents that were provided by unimpeachable sources (who?), interviews with former Texas National Guard officials (Who?) and individuals (WHO?) who worked closely back in the early 1970s with Colonel Jerry Killian and were well acquainted with his procedures, his character and his thinking," the statement read.

"In addition, the documents are backed up not only by independent handwriting and forensic document experts (WHO) but by sources familiar with their content," the statement continued. "Contrary to some rumors, no internal investigation is underway at CBS News nor is one planned."

Interesting to note, in the story Rather said they were authenticated by "an" expert, now it's "experts". So when did the other mystery experts look at it?

CBS can't stonewall this. We are talking about forging Federal documents and interfering in a federal election. John Ashcroft, where are you?

22 posted on 09/10/2004 10:32:16 AM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Um, as of yesterday, weren't they claiming Barnes held some other office at the time that he got Bush into the NG? Lt. Gov. maybe?

Yes. He spoke of facilitating these kinds of things while in both offices.

23 posted on 09/10/2004 10:33:35 AM PDT by MJemison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
I suppose the store of the supposed forgery is much more interesting than the supposed contents of the supposed memos were supposed to be. (A truly supository sentence.)

Supository? Supository sentence? Where do you place one of those, Doctor?

24 posted on 09/10/2004 10:54:45 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Robert357

I freeped 'em - awarded them the Jayson Blair Journalism Prize. Asked who their "expert" was - Michael Moore?


25 posted on 09/10/2004 10:59:25 AM PDT by talleyman (Proud graduate, Attila the Hun School of Diplomacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Supository sentence? Where do you place one of those, Doctor?

Hehehe... "Hey, Dan, it's time for your medicine..."

26 posted on 09/10/2004 11:02:45 AM PDT by talleyman (Proud graduate, Attila the Hun School of Diplomacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

***...that Barne's daughter quotes him as saying in a phone call that he was willing to lie in order to hurt Bush and help Kerry.***

I also read on FR that Barne's daughter said that her father is writing a book and plans to use this lie as the first part of his book. Even more suspicious.


27 posted on 09/10/2004 11:18:31 AM PDT by kitkat (George W. Bush, a PROVEN leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
Yes. At the time that Bush joined the TANG, Barnes was in Europe serving in a UN appointment. At that time, the Texas Legislature met only every other year, which was why Barnes scarfed up the additional job from the UN.

John / Billybob

28 posted on 09/10/2004 11:19:50 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
by unimpeachable sources (who?), interviews with former Texas National Guard officials (Who?) and individuals (WHO?) who worked closely back in the early 1970s with Colonel Jerry Killian

It is now becoming very clear to me that the "brain trust" at DNC said if SwiftBoat Vets can slam Kerry, they can do the same.

They organized a group of willing accomplices in Texas to be the Texans for Truth or whatever it is called. They then had them do some television adds. They DNC operatives then sent the initial add copy and tapes to Dan Rather along with "documents used by the group as 'proof' of their claims." Then they allowed the CBS 60 minutes fact checkers to call the Texans for Truth group to chat.

Of course Dan Blathering-idiot-Rather stands by his story, he has the preponderance of evidence from all kinds of follows of good reputation to back him up.

Of course if Dan goes down in flames he can claim to be a "VICTIM," which is the highest form of excuse among his liberal democratic friend. Being a victim is an excuse for anything up to and including murder.

29 posted on 09/10/2004 11:20:06 AM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I like the way Blather throws around the word expert.

In one way Dan is an expert, that is, an “ex” is a has-been and a “spert” is a drip under pressure.


30 posted on 09/10/2004 11:31:14 AM PDT by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: tractorman

Fox had some idiot on a while ago who had worked with Howard Dean. He was asked about the documents and went into a tirade about the docs being a distraction from the "real issues" and rambled about how Bush didn't serve and Kerry volunteered to go to Vietnam etc. Did anybody say that segment? That guy was not just an idiot, he was rude.


31 posted on 09/10/2004 11:48:49 AM PDT by rdl6989 (Of course the Air Force used typewriters with proportional spacing in 1973 for everyday typing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

I also heard on Fox just a moment ago that the documents had a PO BOX on the letterhead not a real address. The P.O. Box was 34567. D-U-H-H-H!!!!!


32 posted on 09/10/2004 11:52:21 AM PDT by rdl6989 (Of course the Air Force used typewriters with proportional spacing in 1973 for everyday typing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson