This isn't about 30 years ago. This is about someone THIS MONTH forging military documents to smear a sitting president weeks before an election. This is about THIS WEEK, the best-known TV news outlet (60 Minutes) featured a top-three news anchor (Dan Rather) claiming he had new evidence to wreck the current president. This is about who TODAY must explain the origin of those documents - and whoever actually created these forgeries, it's clearly a very short chain to either Dan Rather or John Kerry, or both. The content is irrelevant now; the method and motivation are everything.
The Watergate burglary was thought just a small-time job until Nixon inexplicably said "no comment". That the oldest, most respected news show on TV tried to bring down President Bush with laughably forged documents is no less.
Rather doesn't want to be burned, so he'll blame his source. His source doesn't want to be burned, so he'll blame...who? Rather or Kerry? major fallout either way.
This is about TOMORROW, when Dan Rather resigns and sees his career end in shame and disgrace. This is about NOVEMBER 2ND, when Kerry gets destroyed by President Bush!!!