To: mabelkitty; Buckhead; Howlin
Your suggestion of a nasty note to ABC for using our names and information without permission is a good one. That note should come from Buckhead and Howlin, since they are the two names that appear on the critical Post 47. Here's how the philosophy of "verifying sources" should apply in the New Media. Before a news outlet uses items from a thread on the Internet, the reporter should contact that screen name by e-mail and give at least an hour for a response to come back.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "I'm Mad as Zell, and I'm Not Going to Take It Anymore."
If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.
To: Congressman Billybob; LibFreeUSA
I don't think we should get into that game -- could backfire. And besides, then we wouldn't give them a chance to hang themselves. See post #38.
60 posted on
09/10/2004 8:45:10 AM PDT by
GovernmentShrinker
(Donate to the Swift Vets -- www.swiftvets.com)
To: Congressman Billybob
Since CBS still says they stand by their story, is it possible to go after the advertisers (with lawsuits) since they are the ones supplying the funding, allowing all this electioneering to occur?
61 posted on
09/10/2004 8:50:12 AM PDT by
tertiary01
(Kerry: Are you ready to go back to the Senate yet??)
To: Congressman Billybob
Your suggestion of a nasty note to ABC for using our names and information without permission is a good one. No, it's not. You're going to quash one of the biggest finds we've ever had, in order to play tit for tat?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson