1 posted on
09/09/2004 8:54:31 PM PDT by
MrChips
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: MrChips
2 posted on
09/09/2004 8:55:43 PM PDT by
Sunshine55
(Anal sex is not a family value!)
To: Howlin
She can explain it best. :)
3 posted on
09/09/2004 8:55:44 PM PDT by
TheBigB
("As God is my witness...I thought turkeys could fly.")
To: MrChips
4 posted on
09/09/2004 8:55:47 PM PDT by
bayourod
(You're either for President Bush or against him. There is no "but...")
To: MrChips
6 posted on
09/09/2004 8:59:10 PM PDT by
FairOpinion
(FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
To: MrChips
I never understood the importance given to newsreaders like Rather and Cronkite. Think about it. All they do is sit there and read the news. They aren't journalists. They aren't out in the field doing the legwork. They simply sit there and read off a teleprompter.
We could pull a bum off the street, blow-dry his hair and put him in a suit and he'd do the job just as well.
7 posted on
09/09/2004 9:01:03 PM PDT by
SamAdams76
(Bush 53%)
To: MrChips
Put simply - FR just shook the tree. And the tree's still trembling.
To: MrChips
Its all something about the news media being caught lying and falsifying documents and such.
It all seems like business as usual to me but a lot of people seem to be concerned.
9 posted on
09/09/2004 9:02:21 PM PDT by
Delta 21
(MKC USCG -ret)
To: MrChips
No.
There are two sets of documents.
The AP got Bush's flight records through a FOIA lawsuit earlier in the week.
Here is how Rather explained it last night on 60 Mintues:
But 60 Minutes has obtained a number of documents we are told were taken from Col. Killian's personal file. Among them, a never-before-seen memorandum from May 1972, where Killian writes that Lt. Bush called him to talk about "how he can get out of coming to drill from now through November."
Lt. Bush tells his commander "he is working on a campaign in Alabama
. and may not have time to take his physical." Killian adds that he thinks Lt. Bush has gone over his head, and is "talking to someone upstairs."
Col. Killian died in 1984. 60 Minutes consulted a handwriting analyst and document expert who believes the material is authentic.
The problem is that appear to be forgeries.
10 posted on
09/09/2004 9:03:11 PM PDT by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: MrChips
You ask a far reaching question. How or why would Rather, who has been 'journalizing' on the margins for decades, get caught in such a blatantly sloppy forgery?
This story is making me think about Sandy Buger and his absurd robbery of the National Archives. I can see Burger committing proffessional suicide for someone, but Rather? I can't make any sense of it.
11 posted on
09/09/2004 9:03:23 PM PDT by
tjg
To: MrChips
How was Pan Blather caught with his pants down?
SKERRY was pretending to be ready to receive a football between a player's back legs.
Some are saying his hands were bored while waiting and decided to . . .
Anyway--I really don't know how Pan Blather got caught with his pants down. But the above tale makes about as much sense as the truth about them does!
14 posted on
09/09/2004 9:04:16 PM PDT by
Quix
(PLEASE EMAIL ZELL MILLER AND OTHERS INSISTING HE SPEAK OUT LOTS)
To: MrChips
Typeface did not exist when letters were supposedly written, wrong letter head size, people referenced had retired from Guard, man did not type, some symbols in letter could have only been made on computer. No computers in general office use in '73. Letters are proportionally spaced. No proportionally spaced typewriters in AFNG.
MS Word makes letters exactly as shown.
Forgery... and a bad forgery.
Had CBS been fooled by good forgery, that's one thing, but this was a bad armature job, and they aired it!
15 posted on
09/09/2004 9:04:50 PM PDT by
MindBender26
(Kill all Islamic terrorists now. Then they cannot kill our sons and daughters tomorrow)
To: MrChips; Buckhead; TankerKC; Howlin
I saw freeper Buckhead's post last night. TankerKC had an earlier post.
Then, this morning,
powerlineblog.com started the cascade around 7:50 a.m.
The powerlineblog.com mentions
Buckhead's post #47 right in the first entry in that blog topic.
After powerlineblog.com started it, it was like an avalanche starting with a small snowball rolling down the mountain.
16 posted on
09/09/2004 9:05:06 PM PDT by
Mike Fieschko
(Oh, and Dick Cheney too.)
To: MrChips
Well, first set yersef down. Take off yer shoes, sip a bit of Jack Daniels. Then, start scrolling through and readin' all the posts. You might get done readin' them all by mornin'.
To: MrChips
Signed, Tired Schoolteacher How can you be tired already? School's only been back in session for five minutes.
:-)
19 posted on
09/09/2004 9:05:56 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
To: MrChips
Supposedly, the memos came from Killian's "personal files". However, today his son denied this. And logic precludes this, as these memos are evidence of the alleged author's unethical behavior. Who saves for posterity evidence of one's unethical behavior?
So, in answer to your question, I believe the "memos" were provided by Paul Begala and James Carville who, knowing the documents would sink the Kerry campaign, are paiving the way for a Hillary Clinton presidential run in 2008.
25 posted on
09/09/2004 9:08:24 PM PDT by
kevao
To: MrChips
well, there was this intern named Monica, see, and . . . . oops. wrong democrat scandal.
27 posted on
09/09/2004 9:09:23 PM PDT by
smonk
To: MrChips
Rather is a flim-flam man
Flim-flam man
His mind is up his sleeve
And his talk is make believe
Oh Lord, the man is a fraud
He's the flim-flam man
Rather is a flim-flam man
He's a fox
He's a fool
A leftist tool
Flim-flam man
Bad as the flip-flop man
Leni
28 posted on
09/09/2004 9:09:37 PM PDT by
MinuteGal
(Florida Freepers....We Have a Great State Forum. Click the Flag on your Profile Page to Get to It)
To: MrChips
Please!!! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!! I do not need to have a vision of Dan Rather with his pants down!!! LOL
To: MrChips
Rathergate
32 posted on
09/09/2004 9:11:07 PM PDT by
idkfa
To: MrChips
1. If two amateur Freepers can poke 20 holes in these documents in a few hours, working only from crappy .pdf files, the CBS "experts" should have seen the inconsistencies well before the end of the "six weeks" they had to study the originals.
2. CBS has refused to name their source or their "experts".
Can you spell "cover up" ?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson