To: Blood of Tyrants
I've been following this all day and have not been convinced the memos were forged. The proportionate font, the curved apostrophe, even the superscript "th" can all be explained away one way or another.
Your document overlay has convinced me. There is no question that the "May 1972" memo is exactly the same font as the version you just created.
74 posted on
09/09/2004 2:11:58 PM PDT by
kennedy
To: kennedy
"The proportionate font, the curved apostrophe, even the superscript 'th' can all be explained away one way or another...."
Please explain, based on fact, the superscript 'th', including its mixed use in one document, and absence from another, and reappearance in a third. How does one in 1972 create a single-stroke special character as found?
Remember, you are working with typewriters in existence 30+ years ago.
77 posted on
09/09/2004 2:18:42 PM PDT by
Chummy
(RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote for Osama")
To: kennedy
No problem. Even if I had a photo editor that was capable of rotating in much smaller increments, the distortions caused by the repeated photocopying of the copy of the copy, etc., would most likely prohibit an exact match.
82 posted on
09/09/2004 2:23:03 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson