To: jrawk
I absolutely agree with your assessment. That will be the story from CBS. They had to edit/enter it into a word processor because the originals looked lousy, then they "sexed it up" by making it look old.
It wouldn't be the first time they had been caught sexing up the truth. Does anyone recall the time they had an American voice actor do a fake Iraqi translator accent for Saddam's interview?
30 posted on
09/09/2004 1:00:23 PM PDT by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: Paradox
Does anyone recall the time they had an American voice actor do a fake Iraqi translator accent for Saddam's interview? Yes I do. That time, they just looked stupid. This time they look positively criminal.
43 posted on
09/09/2004 1:13:22 PM PDT by
tbpiper
To: Paradox; jrawk
Could be, but then SeeBS must provide the "original" copy.
And quickly, because how would they prove that they haven't been forging another one, but this time in Courier?
44 posted on
09/09/2004 1:15:14 PM PDT by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: Paradox
Then they should have no difficulty providing the "original" they worked with for impartial examination. I say call Gil Grissom.
48 posted on
09/09/2004 1:16:57 PM PDT by
xkaydet65
(" You have never tasted freedom my friend, else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but w)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson