"...sorry, James... but, as you can see, most
of your wife's brain has now turned to nasal cartilage..."
Posted on 09/09/2004 9:59:21 AM PDT by presidio9
FLUSH hard, this kind of crap and nonesense is not worth the binary bits it uses up. As her initial indicate BS is full of BS.
Babs, you are a has been, get used to it. The only hits your website gets are gay men and the occasional freeper looking to entertain the rest of us with you nonsense.
By the way, your unusual look, which used to be mildly attractive, now just causes a gag respone.
If brains were dynamite, she couldn't blow her nose.
"Proposed an "economic stimulus" plan that helps the rich and does little to encourage job growth"
Babs - I'll explain this on the 3rd grade level for you. When you make lots of money on movies, songs, etc - what do you with that money? You spend it on clothes, cars, makeovers, furniture, whatever. You are giving money to companies/people. When millions of people all over the country do this, it creates business. Businesses need PEOPLE to help them with this, so they hire PEOPLE. These are called J-O-B-S. And over 1.2 million JOBS have been created since last summer.
Question - How would the rich giving all their money to the government improve job creation?
"Go to sleep, crazy lady." - Peter Griffin
Damn you eyes man!
:-)
i heard the movie didnt test well... she ruined it.
She's an idiot, who ever told her she could write? I guess her other career is failing so now she wants to be involved in politics?
Hey Babs............ you're an idiot! And you can't sing either.
Easy. The government then gives the money to people who don't want to work, i.e. "Democrats."
Will someone tell her that "irregardless is not a word?
Hey Babs,
Some religious charity support by gov't doesn't mean that you only get help if you're religious. A second grader can figure that out. You obviously are a complete IDIOT! How stupid can you be? Each time I ask this question, you manage to amaze me once again. Stay out of politics and go waste more electricity in you 7+ plus mansions with A/C running 24x7.
Someone please send Ms. BS this note. :)
Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term.
Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
She calls Bush's Convention speech the STATE OF THE UNION SPEECH 3 TIMES!
Saved the web page and did a screen capture! Documented for proof when someone wakes her up and changes her site.
From Merriam-Webster Online:
Main Entry: ir·re·gard·less
Pronunciation: "ir-i-'gärd-l&s
Function: adverb
Etymology: probably blend of irrespective and regardless nonstandard : REGARDLESS
usage Irregardless originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that "there is no such word." There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use regardless instead.
Well, BABS, since you alluded to the Consitution, please point us to the place where it gives the federal government permission to take taxpayer money at threat of gunpoint and imprisonment, and give it to other people?
And since you claim to have such grand concern for the needy, tell us how much, out of all your millions, you have given to the needy. I don't mean how much you've given to organizations that use up 50% or more of incoming contributions to pay their executives and administrative expenses. I'm not talking about the theoretical value of your time and talent as various fundraisers. I'm talking about how much of your personal wealth you've given that has gone directly to the needy. I'm betting it's a small percentage and that you are a hypocrite.
Go back to singing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.