Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kitty Kelley Book Implodes as Key Witness Recants
NewsMax .com ^ | 9/09/04 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 09/09/2004 8:09:50 AM PDT by kattracks

The big bombshell promised by Kitty Kelley in her scorching anti-Bush book "The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty," has prematurely imploded, with a key witness behind the book's central charge now denying Kelley's version of her account.

"I categorically deny that I ever told Kitty Kelley that George W. Bush used cocaine at Camp David or that I ever saw him use cocaine at Camp David," ex-Bush sister-in-law Sharon Bush said in a statement issued yesterday, according to the Washington Post. Instead, said the one-time Bush family insider, "When Kitty Kelley raised drug use at Camp David, I responded by saying something along the lines of, 'Who would say such a thing?'"

The recantation of the book's central charge has flummoxed media outlets that were planning a mega roll-out for the anti-Bush screed.

When contacted by NewsMax Thursday morning, a spokesman for NBC's "Today Show," which had planned to showcase Kelley's book for three straight mornings in a row next week, couldn't say whether Sharon's statement would change their plans.

Newsweek magazine had already rejected an offer to excerpt the Kelley book because the Bush ex was the sole source of Kelley's big bombshell, with lead reporter Howard Fineman complaining Tuesday that the cocaine story was "un-checkable and an otherwise un-witnessable allegation. So if that's the best she's got, that's why we took a pass on it."

Despite the Sharon Bush debacle, Kelley's publisher is so far hanging tough.

"Doubleday stands fully behind the accuracy of Ms. Kelley's reporting and believes that everything she attributes to Sharon Bush in her book is an accurate account of their discussions," Associate Publisher Suzanne Herz told the Post. "Ms. Kelley met with Sharon Bush over the course of a four-hour lunch on April 1, 2003, at the Chelsea Bistro in Manhattan."

Still, industry insiders are wary of a repeat of the publishing disaster that transpired the last time a book claimed Bush was a coke user.

In 1999, St. Martin's Press was forced to recall 90,000 copies of "Fortunate Son," which alleged that then candidate George W. Bush had been arrested on a cocaine charge in 1972.

Only after the book hit stores did St. Martin's learn that the author of "Son," J.H. Hatfield, had served five years in jail in connection with a conspiracy to commit murder. The Bush book debacle is believed to have contributed to Hatfield's 2001 suicide by drug overdose.



TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kittykelley; kittylitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: kattracks

And I don't care if Prez or Mrs. Bush or J Kerry smoked pot in the 1960s. I was in college by 1969 and pot was literally everywhere. No big deal. As for all her lies, I don't believe her ever anyway.


81 posted on 09/09/2004 8:58:57 AM PDT by NEBO (You don't create terrorists by fighting back. You defeat the terrorists by fighting back. ~GWBush~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
Wonder what Katie Couric's gonna do now for three mornings next week?

I'm sure O'Neill of the Swift Vets could make time... :)

82 posted on 09/09/2004 9:02:40 AM PDT by kevkrom (My handle is "kevkrom", and I approved this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: paulsy
"Did they give Unfit for Command 3 days? Did 60 minutes interview John O'Neill for an hour ala Michael Moore, Richard Clark, and this most recent guy from Texas?:

I'm sure they did, we all just must have missed it!

You can always get The New Soldier by John Kerry here:


Stay Strong,
Fuzzy122

83 posted on 09/09/2004 9:02:59 AM PDT by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and the Armed Forces ... Arnold and Zell too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Newsweek actually did something right?

They may be part of the mainstream media conspiracy, but they aren't stupid.

84 posted on 09/09/2004 9:03:30 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Waaaah wah wah waaaaaaah.


85 posted on 09/09/2004 9:05:10 AM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: benson106

I have no doubt she'll ditch him if it's to her advantage. She'll have to run that by a focus group and do some polling first.


86 posted on 09/09/2004 9:06:19 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Camachee

Why no tape recording of this? Isn't that common practice?


87 posted on 09/09/2004 9:07:36 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Beth

Can't wait to see where B&N and Borders display this POS


88 posted on 09/09/2004 9:08:25 AM PDT by daybreakcoming ("U.S. forces armed with what? Spitballs?".....Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM
So take heart. Things are changing.

I'll take heart when I see that The Sheep change. They've got a decade-long track record that's pretty solid.

You joined the History Book Club, which is a great thing in and of itself. And you also realized the bias right off. Why? Because you don't trust the MSM, by virtue of FR and your own intellect.

The Sheep have been bred for generations to believe whatever they see and read, never doubting in their blind trust. The vast numbers of Sheep are techno-phobes, and it's reinforced by the MSM: Web porn, Web scams, the dot.com bust, the Internet isn't safe for your kids, boogedy-boogedy. And The Sheep believe it. So, the value of the Internet in reaching The Sheep is hopelessly marginalized.

I will laud and give kudos to the SBVT, because they saw how The Sheep would react right off - and they went public with their stategery, right where even the MiniTrue couldn't hide it from The Sheep for long. But the MSM also controls the hearts and minds, and it's a long way to November.

89 posted on 09/09/2004 9:08:47 AM PDT by Old Sarge (ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM

They *could* replace the KK lies with some cool Swiftees coverage instead, and I might be persuaded to spend some time watching the Today show again.


90 posted on 09/09/2004 9:09:11 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (If women really offer equal work for 23 cents less on the dollar, why does anyone bother hiring men?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Aggie Mama
I can see this book being recalled rather quickly; according to various press reports, Ms. Kelly never took notes during her interview with Sharon Bush. If Ms. Bush filed a libel suit, Kelly would almost certainly lose, given her inability to substantiate/confirm the quote. As the editor of Time noted the other day, "we'd have to fact-check the hell out it (Kelly's book)," before it could appear in his magazine.

The fact that Time, Newsweek and even fluff publications like "People" have taken a pass on this book speaks volumes about its veracity. With their boy Kerry down in the polls, they would love to run the Kelly book. I would love to see the memos from the corporate lawyers explaining why the Kelly tome should not be excerpted, or how much money the company could expect to lose through lawsuits.

Meanwhile, NBC soldiers on, determined to give Kelly's dirt an undeserved airing...I guess NBC has made its last payment to Richard Jewell (their last libel victim), and feels ready to lose more of GE's money.

91 posted on 09/09/2004 9:09:27 AM PDT by Spook86 (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I find the timing of this...suspicious :::snicker:::


92 posted on 09/09/2004 9:09:50 AM PDT by manic4organic (Go. Fight. Win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Good catch.


93 posted on 09/09/2004 9:10:14 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (If women really offer equal work for 23 cents less on the dollar, why does anyone bother hiring men?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Good catch.


94 posted on 09/09/2004 9:12:16 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (If women really offer equal work for 23 cents less on the dollar, why does anyone bother hiring men?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Radix; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; LaDivaLoca; Fawnn; ...

Egg on face ping for Al Queda couric ping.


95 posted on 09/09/2004 9:13:04 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Charter member of the VRWC - and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Couldn't have happened to a sweeter dame...



Poison Pen: The Unauthorized Biography of Kitty Kelley
96 posted on 09/09/2004 9:14:25 AM PDT by Antoninus (Abortion; Euthanasia; Fetal Stem Cell Research; Human Cloning; Homo Marriage - NON-NEGOTIABLE ISSUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky
"The Bush book debacle is believed to have contributed to Hatfield's 2001 suicide by drug overdose. "

Kitty should follow his lead.

If Kitty displeases Hillary, she may be found in Fort Marcy Park...

97 posted on 09/09/2004 9:15:33 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Kerry lied while courageous veterans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
I wonder how fat the check will be, and I wonder what kind of slime they will dredge up from her past to convince her that taking the check and shutting up is a good idea.

Based on past Democrat tactics, they'll just inquire if she knows where her cat may be.

And about the health of her kneecaps.

98 posted on 09/09/2004 9:16:07 AM PDT by Ole Okie (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny

Why no tape recording of this? Isn't that common practice?

Not when you are just having lunch, a few drinks, and a casual, chatty conversation. Especially if it's just background and off the record. Besides, a tape is so inconvenient for people of a creative bent.


99 posted on 09/09/2004 9:16:54 AM PDT by Camachee (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; bert; ForGod'sSake; Mudboy Slim; Diva Betsy Ross
"The big bombshell promised by Kitty Kelley in her scorching anti-Bush book 'The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty,' has prematurely imploded, with a key witness behind the book's central charge now denying Kelley's version of her account.
'I categorically deny that I ever told Kitty Kelley that George W. Bush used cocaine at Camp David or that I ever saw him use cocaine at Camp David,' ex-Bush sister-in-law Sharon Bush said in a statement issued yesterday, according to the Washington Post."

HA!!
Well-well-well.
Sounds like a text book case of *slander* then, doesn't it?

"Instead, said the one-time Bush family insider, 'When Kitty Kelley raised drug use at Camp David, I responded by saying something along the lines of, 'Who would say such a thing?'"

This old bag, Kitty Kelly, given her *style* as portrayed above?

...should've confined her ambitions to writing the "News"." {g}

100 posted on 09/09/2004 9:17:26 AM PDT by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson