So memos 1 and 3 are certainly genuine, memos 2 and 4 the possible forgeries with the:
- proportional fonts
- 'th' superscripts
- non-standard nomenclature
since those were in his 'personal file', the forgery thesis can be most easily proved/disproved by simply comparing with other memos in that file, and determining *who* was the source of the memos, ie, did they really have access to the real files.
Gee, wonder what Sandy Berger's been up to lately?
See my #608.