[UseYourHead]

The military and most of the government did not allow the use of anything other than a mono-spaced font, typically courier, for official documents and memos. It was that way the whole 20 years I was in and probably still is. One of the reasons for the limitation was OCR.

Whether the documents are a forgery is a waste of time. Even if they are, the media wing of the DNC will never print one word of the truth - they can't. The unguided nature of man is self-destruction and the MSM is leading the way.

[eno_]

Don't be so pessimistic. With the Internet there is a good chance the forger can be nailed.

[Sacajaweau]

The whole of the matter is that documents exist wherein GWB is making an inquiry as to what he can do within the rules in order to work with his father on this campaign. He is not asking to get out of anything. He is not AWOL. The memos are proof of that. The item numbers in the 01 August 1972 are out of logical order though and presents some confusion. No. 3 and No. 4 appear to be the calendar order of events. Then 1 & 2 occur is the course of action.

It is very apparent that Bush wanted to fulfill the duties of both his country and father.

[plain talk]

IF they were forgeries and it can be traced to dems in the Kerry campaign this could be good. Some conservative group like the SBVs could hit the internet with an advertisement spelling out what the corrupt dems did. The SBVs did some damage. This could be hugh.

[MamaLucci]

Even if they are, the media wing of the DNC will never print one word of the truth.....

Don't you get it?.........it doesn't matter, because they no longer control the flow of information in this country. Old media is SO over.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Whether the documents are a forgery is a waste of time. Even if they are, the media wing of the DNC will never print one word of the truth - they can't. The unguided nature of man is self-destruction and the MSM is leading the way.

Yes. Well, like a lot of propaganda this particular fraud (if such it be, and apparently it is) was transmitted to the public via the "public" airwaves.

They got away with deceiving Florida Panhandle voters into thinking the 2000 vote was decided at a moment when their vote was criticallly important - and the next day they mentioned it momentarily and then permanently changed the subject.

At some point somebody has to sue the FCC and its licensees for the fraudulent certification that CBS is "broadcasting in the public interest." Theoretically, at least, deceiving the public with a broadcast is illegal.