[Reader of news]

Pakistan is an ally in the war on terror. They've captured quite a few Al Qaeda leaders since the start of the war.

[Peach]

Definitely. But there are some malignant posters and faux freepers who try to pretend that Pakistan is the enemy we should have gone after instead of Iraq.

Those faux freepers are here to stir up trouble. And, as I said, if we'd gone after Pakistan instead they would be first in line complaining that we didn't go after Iraq.

[edchambers]

Yea with friends like this who needs...France.

[Cronos]

Pakistan is an ally in the war on terror. They've captured quite a few Al Qaeda leaders since the start of the war.

Pakistan is playing us for a sucker. They are the ones who create the Taliban and were instrumental in the funding and foundign of AlQaeda. THey trained both the groups (the paki ISI probabaly still does). They also gave nukes to North Korea and nearly gave 'em to Irqaq, Iran and Libya.

They haven't actually captured any AlQ "Leaders", just minnows tossed to us to keep us deluded. Ever notice that they are always ont he verge of capturing some alq "leader" just when the US is deliberating whether we need to send them more money or weapons? After we have done that, they either "lose" the "leader" or capture some minnow.

They are playing us for suckers and fools and we are the fools

[Michael121]

In reading "American Soldier" General Tommy Franks book, he writes about Musharraf.

He said they talked not as A General and a President but soldier to soldier.

Musharraf did not like the Taliban but needed Afghanistan militarily. He needed space to fight India. And he also said his nukes were and always will be defensive.

Franks says man to man he believes Musahrraf. The man does not like Islamic or Hindu terrorists.