To: rocklobster11
Holy Smoking Gun! Somebody slipped up by allowing the word processor to automatically print a superscript. No superscript in the header. How very sweet!
To: Chaguito
By gum you're right. Can anyone explain why the 111th in the May 4th memo would be superscripted. Even assuming the letterhead was preprinted (as the 111th in the address at the top is not superscripted), I never saw a typewriter (except an electronic one) that could do superscripts. Also the 111 F.L.S. in the prior paragraph left out the th. A strange inconsistency since the typist would have to go to a good deal of trouble to make the superscript (assuming it is even possible, he would at least have had to change type balls) in the second paragraph but not have even bothered in the first.
To: Chaguito
Holy Smoking Gun! Somebody slipped up by allowing the word processor to automatically print a superscript. No superscript in the header. How very sweet!
Great catch, you're right!
On first doc, you see 111th and then 111th
187 posted on
09/08/2004 10:53:37 PM PDT by
Tamzee
(The NYT.... All the news that pink to print)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson