Skip to comments.
Sharon Bush Denies Kitty Kelley Account
WashingtonPost ^
| 09/09/04
| Howard Kurtz
Posted on 09/08/2004 8:06:39 PM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
To: EDINVA
Hello and thank you so much!
Glad to be here, MOgirl
41
posted on
09/08/2004 8:35:10 PM PDT
by
MOgirl
(In memory of Walton Wayne Callahan, I love you forever.)
To: Pikamax
Kitty Kelly accomplished her mission, lie or no lie. The accusation has been made, the MSM have run with it, and (some) people will believe it.
Kelly's lie is like getting caught dragging a skunk accross the room. Somebody forces you to get rid of the skunk, but the stink still remains.
42
posted on
09/08/2004 8:35:56 PM PDT
by
TheCrusader
("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II (c 1097 a.d.))
To: Shermy
https://www.ge.com/ge/feedback.htm
As the parent company to NBC, I hold GE responsible for the upcoming interview on the Today Show, of Kitty Kelly about her new book. The new book seeks to damage President Bush with allegations which have already been proven wrong. See "Sharom Bush Denies Kitty Kelly Account" by Howard Kurt in the Washington Post 09/09/04 page C01. It is my contention that NBC/Today is giving air time to a slanderous book at a time we are at war.
I currently have a GE refrigerator which I enjoy. But this will be the last GE product I allow in my home until I feel comfortable that I am not providing profit to a company acting in such an UnAmerican fashion. I will also ensure I never purcase any GE stock.
xxxxxxxxxx
Boxborough, MA
43
posted on
09/08/2004 8:36:18 PM PDT
by
ProudVet77
(It ain't over till the TRex throws out TF'n)
To: Pikamax
President Bush's former sister-in-law denied yesterday that she had given author Kitty Kelley any information about allegations of past drug use by Bush...watched a fascinating movie last night on HBO or Starz or one of those called "Shattered Glass" - about the writer Stephen Glass who worked for the "New Republic" for awhile under Michael Kelly and then the new editor, Chuck Lane, producing phoney stories about computer hackers, etc. - his editors took some time to catch on to him because he wrote from fake interview notes, complete with phoney names, businesses and phone numbers which the magazine's fact-checkers couldn't or didn't bother to track down - sounds like Kitty is pulling the same stunt......
To: ambrose
Are people like Kitty Kelley immune from law suits? Seriously. I'd like to know why someone doesn't sue her butt.
John O'neil, who wrote "Unfit for Command" and is a lawyer himself, said: "If I'm lying then why doesn't John Kerry get a lawyer and sue me?" So, it sounds to me like it CAN be done.
45
posted on
09/08/2004 8:39:52 PM PDT
by
no dems
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.... (Psalm 122:6))
To: McGavin999
They plan on throwing as much mud as possible and hoping it will stick. Propaganda can be overdone, and the MSM has pumped the well dry by running one long Bush-bashing campaign since the 2000 election.
After a certain point, people just tune it out as background noise, the overheated rhetoric of die-hard partisans, sound and fury signifying nothing.
The MSM, in its rage against Bush, has lost the discipline that made its propaganda so effective for so long.
46
posted on
09/08/2004 8:39:58 PM PDT
by
Loyalist
(This tagline has been put on hiatus for retooling.)
To: Brandon
"I would not describe it as inaccurate." It means the wimp is covering his hiney by being intentionally ambiguous. "I would not describe it as inaccurate" could mean just about anything you want it to mean.
47
posted on
09/08/2004 8:41:26 PM PDT
by
TheCrusader
("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II (c 1097 a.d.))
To: fhayek
Kitty, dear heart... put up or shut up
48
posted on
09/08/2004 8:45:25 PM PDT
by
pointsal
To: Pikamax
I believe Sharon Bush. And you would think Doubleday would double-check the facts before they allowed Kitty Kelley's tales full of trash to be published.
49
posted on
09/08/2004 8:47:12 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Pikamax
"Although there have been tensions between me and various members of the Bush family, I cannot allow this falsehood to go unchallenged."Good for Sharon. We don't need this crap during the campaign.
50
posted on
09/08/2004 8:50:21 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
(Bush in 2004-Because we MUST!!!)
To: Brandon
Lou ColasuonnoSpokesman for:
Peter Bacanovic
Adelphia Communications Corp's John Rigas
Jessica Lynch
Versace
Sharon Bush
and others
Celebrity crisis management is his game.
51
posted on
09/08/2004 8:50:26 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(I'm mad as Zell)
To: SuziQ
Good for Sharon?
What's good for Sharon is to keep those Bush checks coming in.
52
posted on
09/08/2004 8:52:11 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(I'm mad as Zell)
To: dawn53
Get a black magic marker and write this on your arm :
JOURNALISTS ARE LAZY
53
posted on
09/08/2004 8:52:49 PM PDT
by
fat city
(Julius Rosenberg's soviet code name was "Liberal")
To: Pikamax
Ah. The Bush family must have gotten to her. < /sarcasm >
To: Wait4Truth
Even anti-Bush Newsweek is declining to print any excerpts of her book. Larry King says he will not have her on his show.Guess that leaves it up to 60 Minutes for prime time viewing. Bah!
I'm wondering what extent of legal protection such high profile people as the Bush family have against slanderous s&*t like this KK book.
55
posted on
09/08/2004 8:59:58 PM PDT
by
ride the whirlwind
(Where I come from, deeds mean more than words. - Zell Miller)
To: Pikamax
Never trust a woman who would crap on Frank Sinatra.
Kitty Kelley is to journalism what Larry Flynt is to track & field.
56
posted on
09/08/2004 9:01:18 PM PDT
by
get'emall
(Kofi Annan: Lawn Jockey on the Arab Street.)
To: Wait4Truth
WHEN DID LARRY KING SAY THAT??? He's had her on with her other books!
To: Petronski
If Sharon needs money, I smell a law suit coming.....maybe john edwards can help her.....
To: Jewels1091
The MSM will never report that Kitty Kelley seems to suffer from delusions. They don't care that it isn't true. They spread rumors and will continue to do so until lots of people complain.
59
posted on
09/08/2004 9:08:06 PM PDT
by
Merry
To: Socratic
Gee, I wonder of Katie Couric will make reference to this.
Sure she will - right after her three day interview with the authors of Unfit for Command.
60
posted on
09/08/2004 9:11:45 PM PDT
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson