Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Renewal of assault weapon ban shot down in Senate
Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau ^ | 9/7/04 | GEBE MARTINEZ

Posted on 09/08/2004 7:03:01 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo

With president on the sidelines, its sponsor says, bill has no chance

WASHINGTON - The fight to renew a favored ban on assault weapons effectively died Tuesday after the lead Senate sponsor of a bill to continue restrictions on the sale and manufacture of some semi-automatic weapons conceded defeat.

"Absent the president twisting arms, it's nil," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., of the chances to get a bill passed before midnight Monday, when the law expires.

President Bush has indicated he would sign an extension of the 1994 law if Congress got it to his desk. But Bush has not asked the House to pass it, and congressional Republican leaders, including House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land, have refused to bring it to the floor for a vote.

A survey released this week by the University of Pennsylvania's National Annenberg Election Survey in Philadelphia found that 68 percent of Americans want Congress to extend the gun law.

But gun manufacturers already are marketing military-style firearms in preparation for the rollback of the weapons law, according to a study released Tuesday by the Consumer Federation of America, a nonprofit collection of 300 consumer groups.

The consumer group interviewed gun industry experts and marketing representatives and surveyed manufacturers' catalogs and Web sites. At least one company offers a nonrefundable prepayment option to those looking for a head start.

As a result, "assault weapons are going to be more lethal and less expensive," said Susan Peschin, firearms project director at the federation.

Earlier this year, 52 senators voted for the ban on manufacturing 19 types of semi-automatic rifles and shotguns and on ammunition clips holding more than 10 rounds. But it was part of a bill that was later defeated.

While some House members are expected to try to attach the ban to another "must-pass" bill this session, a pragmatic Feinstein said the fight is over for now. She vowed to re-introduce an assault weapons ban next year.

"If the president says he's going to sign the bill — and that indicates he supports the bill — but he does not do anything to help it pass, the bill will fail," Feinstein said.

Nonetheless, groups continue to campaign until the deadline.

For example, the National Rifle Association gun lobby warned on its Web site that it "cannot take anything for granted." It vowed to "pull out all the stops" to make sure the ban isn't renewed.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, questioned the effectiveness of the current ban and said supporters of gun owners' rights fear a new law might overreach "to all kinds of hunting rifles. Automatic weapons are banned already."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: awb; bang; banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 09/08/2004 7:03:02 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

good


2 posted on 09/08/2004 7:04:05 PM PDT by FesterUSMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FesterUSMC

Worth repeating:






Blech. For the few non-2nd proponents that might read this...

Obviously, "Uzis" and "AK-47s" are, unmodified, fully automatic weapons, and their reference in this article is a blatant attempt to scare the ignorant. (Fully automatic remain under very different regulations - a class III Federal BATF license, plus complying with state and local 'regulation': reports vary, but it is in practice well-nigh impossible for a normal person to get all the licenses required for such weapons in many jurisdictions.)

The reality is that the assault weapons ban banned semi-automatic (one trigger pull = one bullet) weapons based on nothing more than shape (looks somewhat like a military weapon, a pistol that weighs more than 50 oz when unloaded), or cosmetic accessories (folding or telescoping stock or pistol grip on a rifle, a large capacity magazine).

With the exception of the magazine capacity, there is no functional effect on the 'dangerousness' between a so-called 'Assault Weapon', and it's non-assault counterpart. And a reasonably trained person can replace a magazine in less than two seconds.

It also increased the already tight restrictions of an existing ban on 'armor piercing ammunition', where the original (still in force) was "a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium." became "a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile".


1 posted on 09/07/2004 10:59:45 PM PDT by jrpascucci


3 posted on 09/08/2004 7:06:29 PM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"Absent the president twisting arms, it's nil," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., of the chances to get a bill passed before midnight Monday, when the law expire

Let's not rush to judgement, we need a coalition on this assault weapons ban bill and about 17 UN resolutions before the president signs this thing...

4 posted on 09/08/2004 7:08:48 PM PDT by frog_jerk_2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
a pragmatic Feinstein said the fight is over for now.

PARGMATIC, she is, now. But, SOCIALIST, always.

5 posted on 09/08/2004 7:09:19 PM PDT by Old Sarge (ZOT 'em all, let MOD sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
I don't need No Stinking' Assault Rifle!

I've got my Thompson to keep me warm...

6 posted on 09/08/2004 7:12:02 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

yahoo, this will please those who were not going to vote for GW if he signed this bill.


7 posted on 09/08/2004 7:12:20 PM PDT by GailA ( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
As a result, "assault weapons are going to be more lethal and less expensive," said Susan Peschin, firearms project director at the federation.

Well at least they admit it. This was their plan all along. These people are seditious traitors to our republic. They are nothing but elitist punks.

8 posted on 09/08/2004 7:12:39 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

BTTT


9 posted on 09/08/2004 7:14:17 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

This was in my email as well:

GOP: Congress Won't Vote on Weapons Ban

By APARNA H. KUMAR
.c The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - Congress will not vote on an assault weapons ban due to expire Monday, Republican leaders said Wednesday, rejecting a last-ditch effort by supporters to renew it.

``I think the will of the American people is consistent with letting it expire, so it will expire,'' Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., told reporters.

The 10-year ban, signed by President Clinton in 1994, outlawed 19 types of military-style assault weapons. A clause directed that the ban expire unless Congress specifically reauthorized it.

Some Democrats and several police leaders said President Bush should try to persuade Congress to renew the ban. Bush has said he would sign such a bill if Congress passed it.

``If the president asked me, it'd still be no ... because we don't have the votes to pass an assault weapons ban and it will expire Monday and that's that,'' House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, told reporters later.

DeLay said the ban was ``a feel-good piece of legislation'' that does nothing to keep weapons out of the hands of criminals.

However, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said he would consider allowing the House to vote on legislation only if the Senate acted first.

Appearing at a news conference, chiefs of police from the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Atlanta and Seattle predicted an increase in violent gun crimes if the bans does expire.

``Our streets, our homes, our citizens and our police officers will face great danger unless the federal ban on assault weapons is renewed,'' said Charles H. Ramsey, the police chief in the nation's capital.

In March, the Senate voted to add the ban to a bill that would have immunized gun manufacturers from liability suits stemming from violent gun crimes. But the Senate voted 90-8 against the final bill after the National Rifle Association urged its defeat.

NRA President Wayne LaPierre said in an interview with The Associated Press that his group is so confident that Congress won't renew the ban that it is not spending any more money on ads this year opposing it.

He said supporters of the ban could not muster the support needed to bring it to a vote in the House because several Democrats attribute losing their majority in the House in 1994 over votes then in favor of the ban.



09/08/04 21:27 EDT


10 posted on 09/08/2004 7:14:23 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Kerry is DOOMED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
HORRAY!

Thank you Tom Delay. Sad thing is, it would have passed the Senate in no small part due to Rinovich and DeRino both of Ohio.

11 posted on 09/08/2004 7:16:30 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (If "W" stands for wrong, what does the "F" in John F Kerry stand for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Sweet, I want a G3/CETME clone, and I refuse to spend good money on century...


12 posted on 09/08/2004 7:16:40 PM PDT by KingPin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

"more lethal and less expensive" sounds like a winning combination.


13 posted on 09/08/2004 7:17:35 PM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; Dead Corpse
The fight to renew a favored ban on assault weapons effectively died Tuesday after the lead Senate sponsor of a bill to continue restrictions on the sale and manufacture of some semi-automatic weapons conceded defeat.

Good riddance, you unconstitutional MF'er

A survey released this week by the University of Pennsylvania's National Annenberg Election Survey in Philadelphia found that 68 percent of Americans want Congress to extend the gun law.

I'll bet that 95% of those people don't have the slightest clue as to what the AWB's provisions are - and I'm sure that at least 95% of those 95% think that "assault weapons" are full auto guns.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, questioned the effectiveness of the current ban....

Putz. The AWB must die because it is unconstitutional, not because it is "ineffective." What, if we became a police state and some gun control scheme successfully reduced crime then he'd be for it? Moron! However, I'll at least give him the credit for being against renewal.

Oh, Diane: F U!! Same for Admiral Kennedy, Chuck the Schmuck and that hag, Sarah Brady.

14 posted on 09/08/2004 7:18:09 PM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
1) Get out checkbook.

2) Wait for AWB to sunset.

3) Go shopping*.

What's the best web site for firearms? gunsamerica.com?

15 posted on 09/08/2004 7:20:56 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Only dummies play poker with George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"As a result, "assault weapons are going to be more lethal and less expensive," said Susan Peschin, firearms project director at the federation."

Rubbish! Right now you can buy the EXACT same weapons sans cosmetic features like flash suppressors, bayonet lugs, etc. Nothing much is changing, but don't expect the press to tell you that!

16 posted on 09/08/2004 7:21:11 PM PDT by need_a_screen_name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
I'll bet that 95% of those people don't have the slightest clue as to what the AWB's provisions are

19 out of 20? I suspect it's more like 199 out of 200.

17 posted on 09/08/2004 7:22:23 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
``I think the will of the American people is consistent with letting it expire, so it will expire,'' Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., told reporters

Frist sounds like presidential material to me.

18 posted on 09/08/2004 7:24:43 PM PDT by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"Our streets, our homes, our citizens and our police officers will face great danger unless the federal ban on assault weapons is renewed," said Charles H. Ramsey, the police chief in the nation's capital.

That's because, dear Chuckie, your ilk has done everything possible to 'infringe' upon the rights of law-biding citizens to keep and bear arms to protect themselves against the scumbags that you're supposed to be getting off the streets in the first place.

19 posted on 09/08/2004 7:25:15 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (If you decide to kick the tiger in the ass...you'd better be prepared to deal with the teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Your loss is Columbia's gain, Sen. Fineswine.


20 posted on 09/08/2004 7:27:33 PM PDT by TFMcGuire (Either you are an American or you are a Liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson