[mattdono]

So, Mr. Kerry, is the War on Terror the Wrong war, at the Wrong time, in the Wrong place then?

[Viet-Boat-Rider]

NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER

John Kerry has a big problem!

Diagnostic criteria for 301.81 Narcissistic Personality Disorder (cautionary statement) A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

(1) has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

(2) is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

(3) believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

(4) requires excessive admiration

(5) has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

(6) is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

(7) lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

(8) is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

(9) shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

HOW MANY OF THESE TRAITS TO YOU SEE IN JOHN KERRY? I SEE ALL OF THEM. KERRY IS SICK LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, AND WE CAN NOT ALLOW THIS NUT CASE TO GET ELECTED.

[Mo1]

Kerry should do himself a favor and stop talking ping .. LOL

[dufekin]

On behalf of Senator Kerry, let me say that indeed, the War on Terror is the WRONG war at the WRONG time in the WRONG place. We should be fighting some other war--any other war, but most certainly not now. And in any case, it is entirely irresponsible for any leader to take a war to our enemies; our enemies should come here to wage their war, and our President should back them. The first part happened on September 11; the second part didn't. Bush chose the side of America, which is the wrong side. He should have appeased Usama and allied with him--assuming the permission of Jacques Chirac--against Christian civilization in Texas. Or something like that. Maybe it'll change tomorrow.

If that strategy doesn't make complete rational sense to you or sounds like it'll kill your neighbors and children, then you should vote for Bush.