Skip to comments.
The New York Times Fingers Judao-Christians in Beslan Deaths
The Dawn Patrol via The Corner (KJL) ^
| Tuesday, September 07, 2004
| The Dawn Patrol
Posted on 09/07/2004 6:17:23 PM PDT by chiller
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: chiller
To the NYTimes and the Boston Globe, the Islamic terrorists
are "Holy Warriors".
21
posted on
09/07/2004 6:40:36 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.)
To: chiller
Why are we not surprised? Al Jazeera on the Hudson.
22
posted on
09/07/2004 6:41:53 PM PDT
by
hershey
To: Lijahsbubbe
"Collusion" is the exact word he used I believe. It was on CNN headline news around 6:00 or so. I am sure CNN people do lurk here but I am not one of them if that is what you are implying. I really was surprised to hear someone on CNN ask a question like that since most of us here on FR just assume the liberal media is in "collusion" with the terrorists, communists, etc.
To: chiller
The New York Times is still too busy covering the Abu Ghraib story...I guess 50+ front page stories wasn't enough. Savage just ran through a number of headlines from around the country (and world)...and some outlets actually refered to them as "activists"...with none of the ever mentioning the word, terrorists.
24
posted on
09/07/2004 6:43:58 PM PDT
by
cwb
(John Kerry: Still attacking Vietnam Vets after 35 years.)
To: RepublicanHippy
ratings. And their guy Kerry isn't doing so good..
25
posted on
09/07/2004 6:45:39 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: RepublicanHippy
but I am not one of them if that is what you are implyingNo, I wasn't at all!
To: chiller
How do you get the guts to even read the New York Slimes? I haven't for years and I'm a happier man for it!
I guess the liberals are tired of blubbering "why do they hate us?". Now they are blubbering "why do they hate the Russians?".
27
posted on
09/07/2004 6:53:00 PM PDT
by
Ukiapah Heep
(Shoes for Industry!)
To: RepublicanHippy
And just what is the deal with you and Rush, Daryn? (sorry, I couldn't resist...)
To: chiller
29
posted on
09/07/2004 6:57:37 PM PDT
by
Rocky
(Heinz Kerry: 57 positions on any issue)
To: Ukiapah Heep
guess the liberals are tired of blubbering "why do they hate us?". Now they are blubbering "why do they hate the Russians?".With all of their analyzing, I'm surprised they don't have their anchors give the news from a psychiatrists couch.
To: chiller
Sorry...I love brevity but sometimes..
"Boo" coverage concerns the the widely circulated, then retracted, report by Tim Hayes of the Associated Press last Friday. W was campaigning and mentioned he sent his best wishes to former president Clinton after news of Clinton's heart operation broke. Reporter Hays wrote 'the crowd booed (reference toward Clinton) and Bush did nothing to stop it,' (paraphrasing).
The boos from the crowd and Bush's "refusal" to condemn them never happened. They were the whole cloth invention of an obvious media Bush-hater looking for a spin (or driven by the fiction) of W's lack of Swiftvets condemnation.
It was as bald a lie as I've observed in the campaign but not unexpected, given Kerry's current status.
To: chiller
NYT is sold nationwide at Starbucks. I would like to boycott Starbucks unless / until they drop the NYT.
32
posted on
09/07/2004 7:12:25 PM PDT
by
Tax Government
(Before there is faith, there must be hope.)
To: chiller
It is, indeed, an outrage. Nothing more than typical of this bullsh*t so-called newspaper.
To: dufekin
You are correct, Arabic speaking Christians say "Allah" for God (for instance Quddouson Allah is the first line of the Trisagion Hymn (Holy God. . . in English, Hagios ho Theos. . .in Greek) and is a more faithful translation of the Greek original (ho Theos = the God, while Allah is an elision of al Illah = the God) than the English.
The issue of whether the NYT translation is appropriate turns on whether the cowardly thug was pleading entirely in Arabic, in which case a full translation is appropriate, or was using the Arabic "the God" in what was otherwise spoken in Russian or Chechen. Only the Muslims (or those following their custom in reporting Muslim speech or writing) treat Allah as a proper name and leave it untranslated when passing into other languages. An Arabic speaking Christian will sing "Holy God. . ." when singing the Trisagion in English, never "Holy Allah. . .". A Muslim speaking English will speak of Allah in refering to his deity, regarding the Arabic name as part of the Koranic 'revelation'.
If he was pleading in Russian or Chechen, translating Allah from the Arabic along with the translation from Russian or Chechen is dishonest. If he was speaking entirely in Arabic, I have no problem with the translation.
34
posted on
09/07/2004 7:15:29 PM PDT
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know what this was)
To: Tax Government
NYT is sold nationwide at Starbucks. I would like to boycott Starbucks unless / until they drop the NYT. Suggest they get the WSJ for balance? It *is* one of only two national newspapers: the other being USA Today. I think the WSJ is trying to be nationwide too.
To: The_Reader_David
I think the terrorist was quoted as shouting "Allah Akbar" or "Allah is Great". He didn't say "God is great", because the god he refers to does not exist. It was invented in the Arab desert in the 7th century and has been spread by violence and has much reference to God as "great spirit" does from an MGM western.
To: Jack Black
WSJ editions are published in Europe and Asia.
To: chiller
"Imagine you're a person who only gets his or her news from the New York Times."Okay. I'm imagining... I only get my news from the New York Times... Yesssss...I'm a moron...a dysinformed moron...
38
posted on
09/07/2004 7:49:36 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President Bush.)
To: chiller
"This is more than political correctness. This is the deliberate alteration of...news" This is propaganda. This is the New York Times. This is nothing new.
39
posted on
09/07/2004 7:52:32 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(9/11 was never repeated--thanks to President Bush.)
To: chiller
The New York Times has become one, with the enemy.....
They have become the enemy....
Semper Fi
40
posted on
09/07/2004 7:52:46 PM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson