Your posts have included such things as this:
Going back to Creationism would be like going back to believing in an Earth-centered universe. Abandoning reason for madness.
In those two sentences you are clearly saying that those who believe a Creator brought about "all this" cannot be practitioners of good science.
> In those two sentences you are clearly saying that those who believe a Creator brought about "all this" cannot be practitioners of good science.
ERRR. Wrong, but thanks for playing.
A person can quite easily be both a "good Christian" and a "good scientist." Can quite easily believe that a Creator brought about "all this," through natural forces including evolution.
A Creationist can even be a good scientist. Just not in the field of biology and paleontology, of course, just as an astrologer might make a fantastic linguist, but a lousy astrophysicist.
But Creationism, like astrology, is bunk, and will always be bunk. It is not only not supported by the evidence, it is *contradicted* by the evidence.