[zarf]

Nice headling AGAIN by the Times misrepresenting the Polish leaders comments.

He seems to be commneting on our visa policy and NOT our Iraq policy.

Very clever and nuanced context smearing by the SLIMES.

[risk]

bump/ping

[Dallas59]

"This policy means that it is necessary to spend more money to solve Europe's problems, not to wait for the Americans in the Balkans, or in Moldova, or for bringing democracy to Belarus. This is our task."

Good luck.

[DoughtyOne]

Poland has gone out of it's way to be a good friend of the United States. This guy deserves some latitude to make some reasoned comments, even if I do disagree.

The Visa matter should be simple enough for him to understand. We are a target and we MUST protect ourselves. That doesn't mean we are not good friends with his nation, or wish to target his citizens unfairly.

Every visitor to the United States must have valid identification, and needs to processed in a professional matter.

As for Iraq, we shouldn't expect nations to stay there indefinately. At some point Poland should withdraw it's contingent.

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

"neoconservatives of isolationism"

huh?

[AmericanChef]

Poland just might end up as the protector of the EU if other participating countries don't face up to their military responsibilities. Good luck, Poland!

[Indie]

To Poland telling us how to act: Stick it.

[sonofatpatcher2]

Gad! Not only cannot the NYT speak Polish, they still cannot speak English IMHO...

The best use for the Times is wrapping fish if you harbor a real grudge against fish.

Donate to Swift Boat Vets for the Truth HERE.
My Campaign Button Page
and My Toons Page

[ApesForEvolution]

Take the Saudis, the Pakis and all the other Muhammadan nations' visas and give them to the Poles, our friends and allies. 70% against? I'm not huge on polls, but...no pun intended either...