To: ZULU
I have read Qoran and I know how it sounds but I also understand that Qoran was an advancement for the people of Arabian lands 1425 years ago.
Now it does have severe problems for modern world and 21st century, I know that but my take is that it should be edited or modified.
66 posted on
09/06/2004 5:04:31 AM PDT by
F14 Pilot
(Democracy is a process not a product)
To: F14 Pilot
but I also understand that Qoran was an advancement for the people of Arabian lands 1425 years ago. It was an advancement only for the more primitive tribes who roamed the desert like Mohammad's people -- the Persians were far more advanced than Arabs and their religion was superior to Islam. Zoroasterianism was a tolerant religion that accepted freedom and allowed thinking. Every aspect of one's daily life --- including how to clean the inside of the nose -- did not have to be spelled out.
69 posted on
09/06/2004 7:29:15 AM PDT by
FITZ
To: F14 Pilot
Editing the Quran would certainly have positive potential.
84 posted on
09/06/2004 2:46:35 PM PDT by
ZULU
(Fear the government which fears your guns)
To: F14 Pilot
I have read Qoran and I know how it sounds but I also understand that Qoran was an advancement for the people of Arabian lands 1425 years ago.
The peoples of the Arabian PENINSULA maybe, but not for the poples of Arabian lands -- the Syrians, Eygptians etc were Christians and had a high culture, the Yemenis were part of the Christian Ethiopian Empire (which a decade before Mohound came close to destoying Makkah itself)
112 posted on
09/11/2004 7:35:47 AM PDT by
Cronos
(W2K4)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson