Skip to comments.
Presidential Plane Damages Runway
AvWeb ^
| September 1, 2004
| The AVweb Editorial Staff
Posted on 09/05/2004 8:11:10 AM PDT by snopercod
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
The military is going to pay? Oh good, glad I don't have to.
1
posted on
09/05/2004 8:11:10 AM PDT
by
snopercod
To: Aeronaut
Failure to read the AFD ping.
2
posted on
09/05/2004 8:12:01 AM PDT
by
snopercod
(...with persistence and truth)
To: snopercod
The military is going to pay? Oh good, glad I don't have to. LOL
3
posted on
09/05/2004 8:13:07 AM PDT
by
Ladysmith
(Morality anchored to the 'definitions' of man is not anchored at all. - Petronski)
To: snopercod
Why doesn't the campaign pay? Why should I?
To: snopercod; Tijeras_Slim
Bush's fault.
Women and children affected most.
5
posted on
09/05/2004 8:16:15 AM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
To: snopercod
This astounds me. Why would one of Pres Bush's entourage planes be carrying Michael Moore?
6
posted on
09/05/2004 8:16:34 AM PDT
by
xrp
(Executing assigned posting duties flawlessly -- ZERO mistakes)
To: gatorbait
7
posted on
09/05/2004 8:17:47 AM PDT
by
Happygal
(liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
To: snopercod
Uh oh. Trouble in Bedrock.
8
posted on
09/05/2004 8:24:40 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(.......John Kerry suffers from delusions of adequacy........)
To: Founding Father
I think this is just New Mexico's way of getting a nice new and strong runway --- it was obviously a run-down poor quality runway to begin with --- but the money they're demanding will get them a very nice one now.
9
posted on
09/05/2004 8:27:36 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: snopercod
The president's superb performance caused many skidmarks this week, mostly among Democrats.
To: xrp
To: martin_fierro
The timing is suspicious.
Only the wealthy will benefit from this repair.
Should we do this on our own without the support of the UN?
12
posted on
09/05/2004 8:29:07 AM PDT
by
get'emall
(Kofi Annan: Lawn Jockey on the Arab Street.)
To: snopercod
Why would a runway be damaged by a plane "backing up" on it?
13
posted on
09/05/2004 8:29:42 AM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(Bush 53%)
To: snopercod
Why does a plane weigh more when it's backing up?
14
posted on
09/05/2004 8:30:34 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: xrp
15
posted on
09/05/2004 8:32:06 AM PDT
by
Samwise
(Even Kerry says that he can't think in a crisis.)
To: snopercod
I want to know how much fuel they used to back up 2500 feet using thrust reversers. Thrust reversers don't really give very much reverse thrust at all.
16
posted on
09/05/2004 8:32:48 AM PDT
by
Malsua
To: SamAdams76; Dog Gone
I think the thrust-reversers melted the asphalt.
17
posted on
09/05/2004 8:33:03 AM PDT
by
snopercod
(...with persistence and truth)
To: xrp
LOL! Now we know what was in the C-17. MM and 30 tons of donuts.
18
posted on
09/05/2004 8:34:11 AM PDT
by
snopercod
(...with persistence and truth)
To: Dog Gone
I'm guessing it had something to do with an asphalt runway and the heat from the thrusters.
To: snopercod; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...
20
posted on
09/05/2004 8:36:49 AM PDT
by
Aeronaut
(If John Kerry is going to talk about what he likes in a woman, shouldn't it be in Fortune or Money?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
