Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Presidential Plane Damages Runway
AvWeb ^ | September 1, 2004 | The AVweb Editorial Staff

Posted on 09/05/2004 8:11:10 AM PDT by snopercod

We've grown used to a presidential visit closing aviation facilities but the effect is usually temporary. Las Cruces (New Mexico) International Airport closed one of its three runways indefinitely after George W. Bush's entourage left an indelible mark. A C-17 accompanying Air Force One created ruts more than 2,500 feet long when it backed up to get in position for takeoff there last Thursday. Damage is estimated at $1 million. (Oops.)

Airport Manager Theresa Cook told AVweb that the president's travel team was warned that the asphalt runway (in the middle of a Southwest summer day) might not handle the weight of the planes in the entourage.

Cook said the C-32-A (a military version of the Boeing 757) carrying President Bush landed and took off without any problems. It wasn't until the accompanying C-17 backed up for almost half the length of the affected runway that the damage occurred. Cook said she didn't know why the cargo plane backed up, using its thrust reversers, instead of taxiing conventionally.

Initial reports said it was the 757 that caused the damage but that was an error, said Cook. She said the ruts are about two inches deep but the displaced asphalt also created a bump, so the total depth might approach four inches. The runway was closed immediately. The military is expected to cover the cost of repairing the damage but it's not known when the repairs will be made.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: airplane; airport; c17; lascruces; newmexico; nm; oops; scuseme; sorry; woopsie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
The military is going to pay? Oh good, glad I don't have to.
1 posted on 09/05/2004 8:11:10 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aeronaut

Failure to read the AFD ping.


2 posted on 09/05/2004 8:12:01 AM PDT by snopercod (...with persistence and truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
The military is going to pay? Oh good, glad I don't have to.

LOL

3 posted on 09/05/2004 8:13:07 AM PDT by Ladysmith (Morality anchored to the 'definitions' of man is not anchored at all. - Petronski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Why doesn't the campaign pay? Why should I?


4 posted on 09/05/2004 8:14:46 AM PDT by Founding Father
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; Tijeras_Slim

Bush's fault.

Women and children affected most.


5 posted on 09/05/2004 8:16:15 AM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

This astounds me. Why would one of Pres Bush's entourage planes be carrying Michael Moore?


6 posted on 09/05/2004 8:16:34 AM PDT by xrp (Executing assigned posting duties flawlessly -- ZERO mistakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gatorbait

ATC ping-a-ling! :-)


7 posted on 09/05/2004 8:17:47 AM PDT by Happygal (liberalism - a narrow tribal outlook largely founded on class prejudice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Uh oh. Trouble in Bedrock.


8 posted on 09/05/2004 8:24:40 AM PDT by EggsAckley (.......John Kerry suffers from delusions of adequacy........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

I think this is just New Mexico's way of getting a nice new and strong runway --- it was obviously a run-down poor quality runway to begin with --- but the money they're demanding will get them a very nice one now.


9 posted on 09/05/2004 8:27:36 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

The president's superb performance caused many skidmarks this week, mostly among Democrats.


10 posted on 09/05/2004 8:28:10 AM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (You're it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp

LOL!


11 posted on 09/05/2004 8:28:50 AM PDT by John Galt's cousin (GO W!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

The timing is suspicious.

Only the wealthy will benefit from this repair.

Should we do this on our own without the support of the UN?


12 posted on 09/05/2004 8:29:07 AM PDT by get'emall (Kofi Annan: Lawn Jockey on the Arab Street.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Why would a runway be damaged by a plane "backing up" on it?
13 posted on 09/05/2004 8:29:42 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Bush 53%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod

Why does a plane weigh more when it's backing up?


14 posted on 09/05/2004 8:30:34 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp

LOL


15 posted on 09/05/2004 8:32:06 AM PDT by Samwise (Even Kerry says that he can't think in a crisis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: snopercod


I want to know how much fuel they used to back up 2500 feet using thrust reversers. Thrust reversers don't really give very much reverse thrust at all.


16 posted on 09/05/2004 8:32:48 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76; Dog Gone

I think the thrust-reversers melted the asphalt.


17 posted on 09/05/2004 8:33:03 AM PDT by snopercod (...with persistence and truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xrp

LOL! Now we know what was in the C-17. MM and 30 tons of donuts.


18 posted on 09/05/2004 8:34:11 AM PDT by snopercod (...with persistence and truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I'm guessing it had something to do with an asphalt runway and the heat from the thrusters.


19 posted on 09/05/2004 8:34:13 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; Tijeras_Slim; FireTrack; Pukin Dog; citabria; B Knotts; kilowhskey; cyphergirl; ...

20 posted on 09/05/2004 8:36:49 AM PDT by Aeronaut (If John Kerry is going to talk about what he likes in a woman, shouldn't it be in Fortune or Money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson