[quark]

Typical B.S. from Socialist media hacks.

[In God I trust]

Well, there you have it. Anybody surprised? Just make sure you send this article to all your "friends" that say there is no bias and we are all crazy. I'm running out of friends. I just keep sending them proof of bias. tee-hee

[dfwgator]

No media bias there, oh no.

[somemoreequalthanothers]

Every week Brent Bozell searches for left wing media bias.....and every week....he finds it.

[Libertina]

I think it might a piece in the New Yorker, but Michael Medved mentioned a "journalist" who had to get his article in about the Republican Convention for the deadline - he said it was boring - BUT THE CONVENTION HADN'T BEEN HELD YET! He was just writing his opinions from looking at the names of the speakers! Fraud and bias from the leftie writers? OOOOH! I'm shocked... NOT.

[geopyg]

And now lets go outside the Garden and talk with some of the thousands of peaceful protestors against Bush.

Any guess on how many arrests up until Tuesday morning?

....
...

..
.

527 and counting.

[HardStarboard]

So lets see: the mainstream media expects us to praise a candidate who deserted his comrades after 4 months of faking personal heroics and to ignore the most devestating attack on American soil in our history that took the lives of nearly 3000 civilians.

Why if I didn't know better, I'd say that they are mouthpieces for the subversive leftists in America.

[I still care]

I remember after the first day of the Demo convention. All the papers had front pages full of wonderful pictures of Clinton, with balloons and flags, and headlines like,
"Clinton shines at convention"

Today we get plain pictures of McCain or Guiliani, with titles like, "Guiliani mentions 'that day'".

[NYCVirago]

Ohmigosh! A political convention actually criticizing the opponent? Stop the presses!