"Mr. Huntington argues that immigration represents a cultural threat not just because of the pressures from immigration itself but also because of the absolute refusal of our elites—not only in culture but big business and politics also—to resist cultural deracination, slow or halt immigration itself, or even enforce assimilation of newcomers into traditional American civilization."
Why should Mr. Coors differ from his peers? If he doesn't go along with them now it's almast a certainty that they'd make him cave sooner or later.
Why should Mr. Coors differ from his peers? If he doesn't go along with them now it's almast a certainty that they'd make him cave sooner or later.
I agree. Coors' position on immigration seems a bit Clintonesque (i.e., waffley). I definitely would like to hear him take more of a stand before I feel okay about casting a vote for him in November. (I know it's one more Senate seat, but this isn't my only problem with the man. Given his generosity toward the homosexual subculture as head of Coors Brewery, I strongly feel that he's an opportunist who has no principles and who sees the world as a reflection of the bottom line--or the ballot).
I don't know if I will ever be able to forgive my governor from switching endorsements from Schaffer to Coors.