Posted on 08/30/2004 5:47:49 AM PDT by Pitiricus
New York, N.Y. — On the eve of the Boston convention, Kerry aides were buoyant. They appeared utterly convinced that disgusted voters were ready to send the president packing and all their guy had to do was present himself as an acceptable replacement. There was no need for a sales job on either Senator John Kerry's record or agenda. LTJG Kerry would single-handedly assure victory. The mood here in New York is more down to earth and the Republicans' convention plans more ambitious. While the Democrats banked on pervasive loathing of the president, Republicans are betting on his proven leadership.
Bush-campaign aides are more cool calculation than cocky assurance. They note that Kerry has been slipping in the polls and believe they've arrived in New York with a small wind at their back. One top insider has a simple explanation for the recent welcome polls. "President Bush is a good politician, and Kerry's not," he says. He reports firsthand that the president is energized and fully engaged
When asked how they like their chances in November, party and campaign officials invariably detail the work that remains to be done. There are three aims over the next four days. The president's record has to be highlighted, and his Iraq decision defended; his views and values have to contrasted with John Kerry's; and an agenda for his second term must be outlined. They aren't planning on leaving New York in a markedly more confident mood. They modestly hope the foundation laid this week will build momentum for the campaign's remaining weeks.
Republicans do allow that they have been helped by what they see as puzzling missteps by the Kerry campaign. Some wonder why the candidate himself is helping to keep the Swift-boat veterans' controversy alive. They think Max Cleland's stunt in Crawford left them unscathed and the story front and center. One adviser marvels that the Kerry camp didn't anticipate the attack on his antiwar statements and "deal with them months ago." He candidly adds that if Kerry loses, they will look back and only then appreciate that he couldn't be both a war hero and anti-war.
A month ago, Bush and Kerry were tied on who would be the better commander-in-chief. Bush is now up by eight points. After the Boston convention, Kerry halved Bush's advantage on being a "strong leader." Bush is now back up by 20 points. Tied a month ago on "credibility," Bush is now up by seven.
Confident Democrats placed their bet in Boston, but knocking off a sitting president is an awfully big job for a mere lieutenant.
This is a done deal if Hanoi Boy sticks it out. There is some chance that McAwful might pull sKeery and put in Hillary Rob'em. Who else?
Im getting concern over Rasmussen's confidence #s!!
They seem to be shedding
John Kerry - this could be all put to rest if you just released all past and current medical records, and sign the SF180.
Indeed.It is also a daunting task for a Senator with zero executive resume above the swift boat level.
And it is especially daunting for a Senator who is in his 20th year in that body. Presidents rise to the top - or at least to the VP spot - relatively quickly. If Kerry was all that hot he would have beaten Clinton for the nomination in '92 - or even Dukakis in '88. Bush himself went from Governor-elect to President-elect in about 6 years.
Well, the last senator elected president was JFK (Johnson doesn't count, as he got in as the vice President)... The reason I believe is that senators have a record (or in Kerry's case a lack of it) that can be daunting to explain...
Whoops! This was supposed to be posted to the thread about Matt Lauer's interview of W on The Today Show!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.