Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Not-So-Swift Mainstream Media: And how they were forced to cover a story they hated
Weekly Standard ^ | 08/28/2004 | Jonathan V. Last

Posted on 08/28/2004 8:19:31 AM PDT by veronica

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Travis McGee
One thing that strikes me is the contrast between the amount of content people have absorbed about this story vs how little content we get from sound bites. It strikes me as cruel irony that they have been peddling the concept of the information age while, at the same time, restricting the actual information and spooning out opinion, instead.

Before the 2000 election, I found it very difficult to accumulate enough information about the candidates from TV and newspapers. Finally, I found out that C-Span was broadcasting the entire speeches late at night and early in the morning. A long article in the New Yorker clinched it for me.

There is a conflict of interest here, because media outlets stand to profit from political ads which become more necessary when coverage is light. That does not mean I would favor "free time" for politicians, whatever that might mean.

41 posted on 08/28/2004 9:26:33 AM PDT by ClaireSolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cousair
Drudge reports a Chigago Sun Times story by Thomas Lipsomb that the Silver Star Kerry won is bogus also.

In the interest of accuracy, let's recount this situation:

The original citation for the Silver Star award was signed by Adm. Elmo Zumwalt. A second citation for the same incident, with changed wording, was signed by a later Admiral.

The citation in question signed by John Lehman was evidently a request for a replacement medal for the awarded Silver Star. It's wording was somewhat altered. Since Lehman was Secretary of the Navy under Reagan (1981 - 1987, IIRC), he was far removed in time from the original award.

The puzzling aspect is why the same award had three separate citations, one 16 years after the incident in question.

42 posted on 08/28/2004 9:33:47 AM PDT by Ole Okie (Kerry, Kerry, quite contrary. And flippy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
The MSM deals in soundbites and misleading headlines, designed to gull the sheeple.

Most sheeple absorb their total news content from intentionally misleading soundbites and headlines, as they flip from "Bachelorette Slut Golddiggers!" to "Hot Chicks Sleeping Around in NY!"

43 posted on 08/28/2004 9:35:44 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: veronica

bump!!!!


44 posted on 08/28/2004 9:47:15 AM PDT by MonroeDNA (Hillary was in charge of the FBI files, which went into a data base: WHoDB. Genious hackers, expose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
In Time magazine, Joe Klein called the whole affair "incendiary nonsense."

The same Time Magazine that had rewarded Michael Moore's inendiary nonesense with a cover story.


45 posted on 08/28/2004 9:48:03 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

It's good to see the major news media outlets exposed for the biased ideologues that they are. They suppress viewpoints they don't enjoy, or attempt to discredit opinions that don't advance "progressive" causes, usually by rather odious techniques. Hollywood often buttresses these views, along with certain segments of academia.

Thankfully, millions of citizens to day get their news straight and unadulterated from the source(s) without editorial filtering, news blackouts and similar nonsense. The quality and level of writing in print journalism has dropped in recent years. It is true that several "amateurs" have thoroughly outclassed the hidebound major outlets. Only In America.


46 posted on 08/28/2004 9:50:27 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

I am sure your facts are right, but Lehman recounts it as true. It seems when Kerry was getting his stuff together, he wanted to be sure he wouldn't be questioned about anything. He forgot about the two and a half million men involved in the same war.


47 posted on 08/28/2004 9:52:26 AM PDT by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: veronica

But now as we know from the MSM the public has tired of refighting Vietnam and the story has run its course. :^)


48 posted on 08/28/2004 10:15:53 AM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
The combination of talk radio, a publishing house, blogs, and Fox News has given conservatives a voice independent of the old media.

This needs to be amended a bit.

The combination of talk radio, a publishing house, blogs, and Fox News has given freedom-loving Americans a voice independent of the Socialists.

49 posted on 08/28/2004 10:25:02 AM PDT by JennysCool (Always do right; this will gratify some people and astonish the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
"The citation in question signed by John Lehman was evidently a request for a replacement medal for the awarded Silver Star. It's wording was somewhat altered. Since Lehman was Secretary of the Navy under Reagan (1981 - 1987, IIRC), he was far removed in time from the original award.

This has been discussed at length on Free Republic many times:

REGARDLESS of what medals were thrown away, or whose medals (or ribbons) were thrown away, or whether it was medals or ribbons at all that were thrown away; Lehman signed (sometime in the mid-late 80's) NEW CITATIONS awarding medals. There NEVER was ANY reason to CHANGE a citation (the "letter" awarding a medal, to ever, ever get "new medals/ribbons" or anything else. The "award" described in the citation does NOT change the "words" used in the citation describing the action UNLESS "somebody of power and influence" (like a new Senator from Massachusetts!) comes in the somebody's office and demands "new words" be written. Except now, Lehman says he didn't sign Kerry's citation at all!

50 posted on 08/28/2004 1:05:30 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Awesome article. Liberal media bias exposed.


51 posted on 08/28/2004 1:46:30 PM PDT by Cableguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"when so much unsubstantiated or even false information can reach the public"

"...when so much unsubstantiated or even false information can reach the public..."

That's what really frosts them. They don't have absolute control over what the public hears anymore.

"I don't think newspapers can be the gatekeepers anymore--to say this is wrong and we will ignore it. Now we have to say this is wrong and here is why."

Yeah, it's a lot harder when you have to support your stupid positions with facts, isn't it? How dare people not just take your word for it anymore! < /sarcasm > Maybe it's that you've lost all credibility, ya think?

The American MSM makes al Jazeera look fair and balanced.

52 posted on 08/28/2004 2:10:29 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." (Eccl. 10:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne
"I wasn't aware that there was a standard for accuracy.(sarcasm)"

Depends on what the meaning of "is" is.

53 posted on 08/28/2004 2:13:35 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." (Eccl. 10:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; Travis McGee; veronica

Re: Post #12

That sudden rush of MSM coverage was totally orchestrated by the Kerry Campaign. The Washington Post, NY Times and Salon.com illegal 527's all jumped in Kerry's bed together on one infamous day (to all military vets). The Dems had the whole strategy planned to immediately use those stories to file false charges against Bush and blow oxygen on the media arson. Luckily for democracy there was a massive blowback.

If a reporter wants to be brave and rat out his peers it would be a major media scandal (sort of like that Quiz Show scandal in the 50's or whatever).


54 posted on 08/28/2004 2:16:14 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: hershey
"the MSM had held a meeting where they'd laid out the plans for managing the news for the summer, through the fall, to Nov"

It is the job of these dumb@$$es to REPORT the news, not MANAGE the news. The only difference between these media whores and the self-appointed loud-mouthed celebrity political advisors is that one group is made up of educated fools and the other of high school and college dropouts.

55 posted on 08/28/2004 2:19:20 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." (Eccl. 10:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
"My grade school didn't offer journalism classes to first-graders."

Maybe he was referring to the intellectual peak of the average msm journalist.

56 posted on 08/28/2004 2:25:38 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." (Eccl. 10:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Excellent article. This is the tastiest morsel I've had in a week of very tasty morsels.


57 posted on 08/28/2004 5:20:36 PM PDT by Semi Civil Servant (I spent Chanukah in the Hamptons, and Christmas in Cambodia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semi Civil Servant
I agree.

It is what the mainstream has chosen not to report, or to report in a biased manner that has been their undoing.

Now when people watch them, the people are armed with background information and are begining to notice what is left out, smeared, plastered with sarcastic innuendo and are starting to question the credibility of the liberal left that has controlled our media for SO LONG.

A bunch of these hard core mainstream media folks were a PART of kerry's intense trashing of our military-they helped him do it because of their own belief systems and now, with deep anger, are watching America wake up to their propaganda - or editing OUT of the full story.

It has been interesting.

These old news grunts still believe they control all of us...it is hard to give up that power. So they battle hating the story, knowing they were a PART of causing our failure in Vietnam and knowing the protesters in the streets of NY are a part of who they are and who they formed through their constand inability to tell us the full story. Which is why we never get to hear of the immense successes in Afganistan and Iraq. These people dispise all that makes America, a miracle.

58 posted on 08/28/2004 5:38:01 PM PDT by Republic (As the election date approaches, I pray our Father opens everyone's eyes and ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Yeah, the old media really cared about vetting the facts when when it came to the Richard Clarke, and Wilson/Palme yarns.
Hypocrites.
59 posted on 08/28/2004 5:56:32 PM PDT by El Cid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I always rejoice when the price of newsprint goes up - another nail in the coffin of the liberal press.
60 posted on 08/28/2004 6:54:09 PM PDT by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson