Another way to measure the financial juggernaut that the NYT represents for Kerry is to find out what advertising costs in the Times. Then take that cost per square inch and do a quick and dirty run on the stories that the Times writes for Kerry and the ones against Bush. That's the real tale of the financial tape.
It's worse than that. After CFR, such ads can't legally be run at any price ... but can still be run as "news", which the NYT will be only too happy to oblige.
Since the people in charge of the NYT have now been identified as biased Kerry supporters, the biased NYT reporting that so blatantly excuses all of Kerry lies and denounces all of Kerry's detractors, can be counted as a campaign contribution.
Since contributions to the presidential candidates are not allowed (after a certain date already passed) the NYT is in violation of the FEC's laws.