Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCV Announces Gettysburg Boycott
Sons of Confederate Veterans ^ | 8/25/2004 | Brag Bowling

Posted on 08/26/2004 7:53:13 PM PDT by RebelBanker

The greatest battle ever fought on the North American continent and the historical aftermath of this titanic contest have been lost forever in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. On the same grounds where Robert E. Lee, John Buford and John Reynolds fought for principles they held dear to them, Gettysburg College has decided that political correctness is more important than it’s historical identity.

The Sons of Confederate Veterans hereby alert all of our members and friends to attend the rally to be held on September 2 and September 3 at Gettysburg College to protest the College sponsored art exhibit featuring the hateful anti-Southern artwork of John Sims.

It has become apparent that neither Gettysburg College nor Gettysburg appreciates the value of Southern tourism. The valor exhibited by Confederate soldiers in this decisive battle is no longer important to officials of Gettysburg or Gettysburg College. The Confederate Battle flag is an honored flag flown on the battlefield by our Confederate soldiers. By promoting what the college calls “art” in which any intelligent person can see is nothing but thinly disguised hatred, the Sons of Confederate Veterans have decided that an economic boycott of the Gettysburg area will commence on September 3. And millions of American citizens with a love of the South and their Confederate heritage have been deeply offended.

Commander-in-Chief Denne Sweeney hereby calls on all members, families, and friends to avoid Gettysburg and not to spend any money in the Gettysburg area. All people concerned with the anti-Southern bigotry of this area should alert friends, media, and anyone concerned with the growing problem in Gettysburg so that this boycott will become nationwide and not just regional.

After September 3, Gettysburg is to be avoided whenever vacation plans are being made. Please pass this on to all media, lists and Internet services for widespread distribution.

Brag Bowling
National Press Officer
Sons of Confederate Veterans

804.359.0382


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: art; boofreakinhoo; confederateflag; dixie; dixiecranks; dixievictimology; gettysburg; gettysburgcollege; makethemstopmommy; mommymommymommy; mommytheylaughatme; permanentlyoffended; poorpoorme; rebelobsessednuts; scv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last
To: Atlanta

>>Personally, I'd like to thank Gen. Sherman and the Union Army for burning my city to the ground. Nothing left.<<

What? The ruins of Atlanta haven't been meticulously preserved? They've allowed construction on those hallowed grounds? Next you're going to tell me that they allow Coca-cola in Atlanta.


101 posted on 08/27/2004 10:15:50 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Let's not play the race card, please.

LOL, its the Civil freaking War we are talking about...

102 posted on 08/27/2004 10:27:53 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dangus
>>That Macdonalds right on the G'burg battlefield is a sure sign it's Yankee country.<<

OK, you need to stop making crap up. There is no McDonalds on the Gettysburg battlefield. The nearest one is across US 15.

McDonald's 517 Steinwehr Ave Gettysburg, PA
Hardee's 533 Steinwehr Ave Gettysburg, PA
KFC 539 Steinwehr Ave Gettysburg, PA

Yipes! There's capitalism in Gettysburg!

No kidding. I believe there was capitalism in Gettysburg in (and before) 1863 as well. The point I and others are attempting to make is that there are in fact fast food restaurants on the battlefield.

103 posted on 08/27/2004 10:48:09 AM PDT by RebelBanker ("Nuance" is the French word for "Gobbledegook.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

"And yet y'all got so upset at Nat Turner and Denmark Vessey."

I'm not that old.


104 posted on 08/27/2004 11:08:19 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

>>OK, you need to stop making crap up. There is no McDonalds on the Gettysburg battlefield. The nearest one is across US 15.<<

>>The point I and others are attempting to make is that there are in fact fast food restaurants on the battlefield<<

US 15, if I recall correctly, is Steinwehr Ave. (That's my recollection of where the McDonalds is.) That is not on the preserved battlefield. If you want to contend that what you're defining as the "battlefield" includes the area that is now commercialized Gettysburg, your definition is quite reasonable; I probably agree with it. But it smashes to smithereens the larger purpose of the argument.


105 posted on 08/27/2004 11:13:12 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Some Southerners have a real inferiority complex. They're really quite obsessed with the Civil War and they think everyone else in the country has this stereotype that people south of the Mason-Dixon line are mouth-breathing imbeciles.


106 posted on 08/27/2004 11:24:16 AM PDT by Modernman (Hippies.They're everywhere. They wanna save the earth, but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
The battlefield is overrun with monuments.

Uh, is that a bad thing? Monuments to the guys who died there?

I think the monuments are great. In general, they mark the exact positions of various units at various times, and really help you visualize the battlefield. I thoroughly enjoyed hopping out of the car and reading the line of monuments for the Iron Brigade overlooking Willoughby Run, the monument marking the point where Lee welcomed back the casualties from Pickett's Charge, the end line marker for the 20th Maine.... I find it odd that you think having a marker for a regiment that bled and died during those three days somehow "pollutes" the battlefield.

Commercial interests and urban sprawl are pushing on the park borders.

"On the borders?" Different than in the actual park, and the only place I really saw much of that was at the far northern end of the battlefield around the town. Not perfect, but not horrible either.

107 posted on 08/27/2004 11:30:45 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
Shiloh is a great park, kinda like Sharpsberg but a lot quieter, the people from the Park service are very knowlegable and unPC in my experience. I had family that fought with the 6th Iowa and they helped me follow the battle from that perspective.
108 posted on 08/27/2004 11:32:59 AM PDT by Little Bill (John F'n Kerry is a self promoting scumbag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Atlanta

Walt? Is that you?


109 posted on 08/27/2004 11:42:54 AM PDT by 4CJ (||) Men die by the calendar, but nations die by their character. - John Armor, 5 Jun 2004 (||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
My father and I drove down to Shiloh two weeks ago, and I was highly impressed by its quiet dignity. Some of the Union states went a little overboard with their monuments (ie. Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Ohio), but my favorite monument had to be Kentucky's.

A border state that sent her sons to Shiloh in Union blue and Confederate gray, Kentucky suffered heavy casualties on both sides of the battle. Their monument is a detailed map of the conflict that highlights the Kentucky regiments movements with bronze plaques on either side that describes these units' actions and lists the state's casualties (approx. 1000 each for the Union and Confederacy, even though there were 6500 fighting for the North and only 2200 fighting for the South).

110 posted on 08/27/2004 11:44:33 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Eagle Scout class of 1992.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead

Never said polluted, just overrun // read my words.


111 posted on 08/27/2004 11:45:59 AM PDT by stainlessbanner (I am a pitbull on the pantleg of opportunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
according to the NY Tribune, every lampost was "decorated with a swinging body".

Ah, once again, watie conflates hyperbole with statistic.

Reliable statistics show somewhere between 100 and 120 killed in the New York draft riots. The vast majority of those were members of the mob shot by police and soldiers. The numbers of blacks murdered is somewhere about a dozen.

The absolute outer limit of estimated dead is about 1000, but most sources discount that as Radical Republican hyperbole. You do realize, of course, that the New York Tribune you cite was the newspaper of Horace Greeley, don't you? Are you sure you want to cite him as a reliable source? Can I then use him as a reliable source for other things?

That's the consensus from numerous sources. If you've got something else that involves actual numbers, put it up, but I know you won't. Instead you'll just continue to spout the usual bizarrely capitalized tirades about DAMNYANKEES and SOUTHERN FREEDOM.

And for the record, the number of blacks lynched between 1882 and 1968 is reliably put at 3446. If you want, I can post lots of pictures.

112 posted on 08/27/2004 11:52:26 AM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson
Some of the Union states went a little overboard with their monuments

Exactly my point about G'burg monuments. NY and PA placed so many memorials up there. Would like to see that KY monument at Shiloh.

113 posted on 08/27/2004 11:55:43 AM PDT by stainlessbanner (I am a pitbull on the pantleg of opportunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner

I think both sides payed a horrible price at Gettysburg. No matter which side won, it should be preserved as one of the high points in this nations battle to define itself.


114 posted on 08/27/2004 11:57:30 AM PDT by BooBoo1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth
How many black men were lynched in the south by numerous 'sons' of Confederates?

Back to the original question. Of 3446 lynchings you stated, how many are directly related to SCVs?

115 posted on 08/27/2004 11:59:36 AM PDT by stainlessbanner (I am a pitbull on the pantleg of opportunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: BooBoo1000
it should be preserved as one of the high points in this nations battle to define itself.

Agreed. It's hallowed ground - no commercialization, no developments, just the land, the memory of our ancestors, and our prayers.

116 posted on 08/27/2004 12:01:06 PM PDT by stainlessbanner (I am a pitbull on the pantleg of opportunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

My ancestors fought for the Union, but I say this Confederate-bashing is a bunch of bull.


117 posted on 08/27/2004 12:17:10 PM PDT by colorado tanker (shove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Back to the original question. Of 3446 lynchings you stated, how many are directly related to SCVs?

That's a hard one to nail down, since "sons of confederate veterans" is a slippery definition. Are we talking about actual physical sons of enlisted soldiers and officers of the confederate army? Would they have to be leaders of the lynch mob or just members? In any case, no such statistics exist, given the nature of lynch mobs and the failure, if not outright complicity, of southern courts and law enforcement agencies to ever investigate, try and punish those mobs.

But just to put to rest that argument about "the northern states lynched blacks, too!" I'll simply concede that, tragically, you are correct. However, I'll point out that of the 3446 blacks lynched, a total of 352 were lynched in states the comprised the Union during the Civil War. And of that number, over 200 were in the border slave states of Missouri and Kentucky. Coincidentally, Texas alone also had 352 black lynchings, tying the entire North. They were beat by Mississippi, with 539, and Georgia with 492. So I guess you southern boys beat the yankees in that competition.

118 posted on 08/27/2004 12:37:16 PM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth

Well well, looks like we have some rebel bashing going on here.Look guys, your right, people in the south all have 6 fingers and 4 toes, etc. Why on earth would my northern brethren be moving here in droves is beyond me. Then again, when you have a 6th grade education and slop hogs all day, hey, what do I know? Keep dreaming. The south has risen again. If you wondered what happened to the capital in those old northern cities, both human and money, look south.Looks like to me, from my travels up north, Gen. Sherman was on the wrong team. Well, its feeding time. Hogs eat a lot in a 6 month summer. Better get them coats out up there. Oh, and don't forget the long underwear.


119 posted on 08/27/2004 1:17:08 PM PDT by Atlanta ( Be the hammer or the anvil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: dangus

I got your Philly Cheesesteak right here...


120 posted on 08/27/2004 1:21:59 PM PDT by Atlanta ( Be the hammer or the anvil...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson