Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I've read it. "Irreducable Complexity" is not a proveable or falsifiable concept, period. You'll note the complete lack of any pro-ID experiments.
192 posted on 09/08/2004 9:00:30 AM PDT by Shryke (Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: All
The Editor of the Peer-reviewed Journal in which Meyer submitted his paper responds to the critics on his web page:

===================================================

Dear Visitor,

Controversy and confusion surround the recent publication of the paper "The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories" by Dr. Stephen C. Meyer in the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. I was the managing editor of the Proceedings at the time of publication of the paper and I handled the review and editing process. The material on this website will clarify and resolve many of the disputes about the paper.

Sincerely,

Rick v. Sternberg September 16, 2004

Webpage

=================================

Now we just need Dr. Meyer to hurry and respond to his critics. Mike Gene from ARN has already fired a salvo on Meyer's behalf:

Meyer, ID, and Creationism

193 posted on 09/16/2004 12:18:26 PM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson