There is nothing the Vets can do about it, except try to buy the domain at blackmail prices.
If it went to Kerry, I won't be able to poop for a week.
OK, so which one is bogus - com or org?
"... So what does this mean for intellectual property owners and law enforcement? The first step for most parties interested in contacting a registrant who uses the service will be to send a letter to Domains By Proxy, Attn. Legal Complaints, 15111 N. Hayden Road, Suite 160 PMB 353, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260. According to its Legal Terms page, Domains By Proxy claims that it will not allow registrants using the service to:
Transmit spam, viruses or harmful computer programs;
Violate the law;
Infringe or violate a third party's trademark or other legal rights;
Engage in morally objectionable activities, including but not limited to those which are child pornographic, harmful to minors, defamatory, abusive, threatening, harassing, tortious, obscene, racially, ethnically, or otherwise objectionable, involve hate crimes or terrorism.
Registrants using the service are bound by the UDRP, the Domain Name Proxy Agreement, Privacy Policy and Anti-Spam Policy. Registrants also agree that they will provide accurate contact information to Domains By Proxy when they register or transfer domain names to it. It appears that Domains By Proxy has covered the bases and created a system where registrants are bound to more requirements than traditional domain name registration. However, these checks may not keep Domains By Proxy from being named as a party in UDRP or ACPA disputes. Other resellers have been named before in those cases, and lost. For a recent example, see Biogen, Inc. v. Namesecure.com, Inc., WIPO Case D2002-0270 (May 20, 2002). ..."