Because he has asked for the FULL, WHOLE quotes. I don't have it memorized verbatim... do you??? If I had on the spot quoted and gotten it WRONG, then yes I would have lost the battle on that point. I am swamped today. My website got 87,705 'hits' just yesterday. Do you have any clue how many emails I handle in one day? The volume is massive now. Sheesh! If I "lose" in your eyes and Old Sarge's, then, too bad. I think I have performed well today. What have you guys done to tackle the likes of this level of media one-on-one? C'mon backseaters. The view from the driver's seat is a bit different than yours in that back seat.
Why don't you quit spending so much friggin time sniping back and forth with me and just answer the guy's question.
I'm carefully working on convincing a single voter in California to vote for Bush today. You, on the other hand have given a high profile editor justification for believing that he's correct by wasting time here and not responding. This could affect the opinions of thousands!! You're doing more harm to our cause by not responding than helping! Don't get in over your head.
Quit prattling on about your 87,000 hits and respond to him! (Do you respond the HTTP packets manually or what!?!?!) Look up the Kerry quotes on the internet. Or ask Freepers to help find answers, but don't just get on here and whine about being "censored". What a joke.
Linda, you're one of a kind and I'm d@mn proud of you!