Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest

As to your post 23, it was my understanding that Kerry hasn't yet admitted he wasn't there, just that he wasn't there on Christmas but at some later time. Supposedly his historian is coming out with an explanation. Has this changed?

Caution: don't hold your breath that we will see this "explanation" before early November. Breathe deeply. Try not to sigh.


30 posted on 08/24/2004 4:40:53 AM PDT by B.Bumbleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: B.Bumbleberry
it was my understanding that Kerry hasn't yet admitted he wasn't there, just that he wasn't there on Christmas but at some later time. Supposedly his historian is coming out with an explanation. Has this changed?

Check out this excerpt from an op-ed piece also in today's WaPo. Naturally the Kerry people don't flatly admit he lied, but they're getting awfully close. Here's the URL of the full column:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27211-2004Aug23.html

"Two weeks ago Kerry's spokesmen began to backtrack. First, one campaign aide explained that Kerry had patrolled the Mekong Delta somewhere "between" Cambodia and Vietnam. But there is no between; there is a border. Then another spokesman told reporters that Kerry had been "near Cambodia." But the point of Kerry's 1986 speech was that he personally had taken part in a secret and illegal war in a neutral country. That was only true if he was "in Cambodia," as he had often said he was. If he was merely "near," then his deliberate misstatement falsified the entire speech.

"Next, the campaign leaked a new version through the medium of historian Douglas Brinkley, author of "Tour of Duty," a laudatory book on Kerry's military service. Last week Brinkley told the London Telegraph that while Kerry had been 50 miles from the border on Christmas, he "went into Cambodian waters three or four times in January and February 1969 on clandestine missions." Oddly, though, while Brinkley devotes nearly 100 pages of his book to Kerry's activities that January and February, pinpointing the locations of various battles and often placing Kerry near Cambodia, he nowhere mentions Kerry's crossing into Cambodia, an inconceivable omission if it were true.

"Now a new official statement from the campaign undercuts Brinkley. It offers a minimal (thus harder to impeach) claim: that Kerry "on one occasion crossed into Cambodia," on an unspecified date. But at least two of the shipmates who are supporting Kerry's campaign (and one who is not) deny their boat ever crossed the border, and their testimony on this score is corroborated by Kerry's own journal, kept while on duty. One passage reproduced in Brinkley's book says: "The banks of the [Rach Giang Thanh River] whistled by as we churned out mile after mile at full speed. On my left were occasional open fields that allowed us a clear view into Cambodia. At some points, the border was only fifty yards away and it then would meander out to several hundred or even as much as a thousand yards away, always making one wonder what lay on the other side." His curiosity was never satisfied, because this entry was from Kerry's final mission."

46 posted on 08/24/2004 4:54:56 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson