Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Electoral College Breakdown 2004, August 22nd Update
Daly Thoughts & ECB 2004 ^ | 8/23/04 | Gerry Daly

Posted on 08/23/2004 6:58:48 PM PDT by Dales

Edited on 08/23/2004 7:03:18 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]

I Wouldn't Touch It With a 10 Foot Poll

Chances Are

Kevin Drum of the Washington Monthly recently wrote an intruiging piece that argues that when the media reports a poll as showing a statistical tie, this is not necessarily the case.

In fact, what we're really interested in is the probability that the difference is greater than zero — in other words, that one candidate is genuinely ahead of the other. But this probability isn't a cutoff, it's a continuum: the bigger the lead, the more likely that someone is ahead and that the result isn't just a polling fluke. So instead of lazily reporting any result within the MOE as a "tie," which is statistically wrong anyway, it would be more informative to just go ahead and tell us how probable it is that a candidate is really ahead.

Mr. Drum presents a chart that helps translating various leads, given a particular margin of error, into the probability that the candidate with a particular lead is actually ahead. For example, if a poll with a three point margin of error shows a candidate having a two point lead, then there is a 75% chance that the candidate really does have a lead. In other words, while that result is well within the margin of error, there is a considerable chance that the candidate shown to be in the lead is actually in the lead.

From a purely mathematical point of view, this is correct. Harris Interactive made a similar point in the press release accompanying their most recent national poll.

Journalists often describe a close race, where a poll shows a small gap between two candidates as a "statistical dead heat." Harris Interactive and most other leading firms never use this phrase because we believe it is misleading. It implies, wrongly, that there is an equal probability that either candidate is ahead and that (wrongly again) there is no difference between (say) a two-point lead for one candidate and a two-point lead over the other. The term "a dead heat" should only be used when the poll shows the candidates to be exactly equal. If one candidate is ahead by even one percentage point, there is a probability (if not a big one) that he or she is actually ahead, so it is wrong to describe this as a "statistical dead heat."

The implications for those who analyze polling data for meaning would be evident if that was all there is to the story; even a mere 1 point lead in a survey would mean there is about a 60% chance that the leading candidate actually would win if the election was held at that point in time.

But is that all there is to the story?

To help answer that question, we can look back to the 2000 Presidential election. The popular vote rounded to the nearest percentage point was a tie, 48% for Gore to 48% for Bush. As documented by the National Council on Public Polls, seven out of ten major polls taken before the election found Bush leading Gore by at least 2 points. Given the typical margin of error for the national polls of plus or minus three percent, the percentage of the time that a Gore would actually have been leading when a poll result showed Bush leading by 2 points was 25%. That would be for a single poll result, however. What are the chances that 7 out of 10 polls would show Bush leading by 2 points when the race was, in reality, essentially a tie? The actual chances of this occurring due to random variance is about 0.351% of the time, or 7 times out of 2000. Further, in actuality Gore came out about 0.5% ahead of Bush. The chance that a single poll would show him trailing by 2 when he was really ahead by half of a point is about 20%. The chance that 7 out of 10 would show the same drops to 0.086%, or less than one time out of a thousand. It was possible, but not likely.

Things get even dicier when one looks back at the 1996 election. While that race was not nearly as close as 2000, the overwhelming majority of pollsters were off from the actual result by margins well beyond what can be explained as random chance. There may be a realistic chance that a single poll result will be off by 5 points, but there is little chance that 9 out of 10 will be off by that much unless there is something else causing the error beyond the error predicted by sampling.

This jibes with the review I did of the state polling from 2000 earlier this year. In that review, I found that while it would seem intuitive that the candidate who was leading by up to three points in the last poll taken before the election in a state would have a better than even chance of winning the state, there was no such correlation during the 2000 election.

Further evidence that there is more to the story can be found in the polling of John Zogby for the 2002 Senatorial races. Zogby had Thune winning by 5%. He lost. The chance that Johnson would actually be winning when a poll with a 4% MoE had him down by 5% was just 10%. Zogby had Mondale up by 6%; the chance that Coleman was actually winning given that result was just 6%. He had Talent up by 8%. While Talent did win, the chance that the race would be as tight as it was given the poll's result was under 6%. He had Strickland up by 6%; again the chance that Allard was ahead was 6%. He also had Cleland winning, and Terrell way ahead of Landrieux. The chance that Zogby would be so wrong so often just by random chance was below 1 in 10,000.

The same Harris press release that describes why it is inaccurate to say that a one or two point lead is a statistical dead heat gives a partial explanation to why it remains accurate to say that a one or two point lead gives little indication as to who is actually ahead.

Unfortunately, there are several other possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include refusals to be interviewed (nonresponse), question wording and question order, interviewer bias, weighting by demographic control data and screening (e.g., for likely voters). It is impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these factors.

Throw in the fact that when a survey is taken there are undecided voters who will end up voting one way or another and it becomes even more clear that while statistics may say that a candidate up by 2 points has a greater chance of being ahead, the probability is overwhelmed by the other factors. The fact of the matter is that polling as applied to campaigns is a fuzzy science. As long as there is no way to identify before hand exactly who will vote, and as long as there is no way to force undecideds to decide beforehand exactly how they will decide on election day, polls will never be as accurate as theory would dictate.


This Week's Polling Updates Overview

There were many polls this week (21 different states polled, but still no Delaware), and most of them showed the race tightening up compared to the previous two weeks. This is best shown by the ECB Classic view, which now has just a four electoral vote margin between the two candidates. I believe this to be a bit misleading though, as this view has California being too tight to have in Kerry's ledger. The main ECB view of the race still has Kerry ahead comfortably, but many of the states that are now included in his total are barely hanging on to the "Leaning" designation.

The scoreboard:

Result With Tossups
ECB Kerry 255, Bush 178 Kerry 316, Bush 206
ECB Classic Kerry 161, Bush 157 Kerry 291, Bush 232
ECB Classic Sans Zogby Interactive Kerry 216, Bush 157 Kerry 296, Bush 227
Calculated National Result Bush 46.3%, Kerry 46.1%

For the trends, the changes in each are as follows:

ECB Kerry unch., Bush -9 Kerry unch., Bush -4
ECB Classic Kerry -99, Bush +6 Kerry -20, Bush +11
ECB Classic Sans Zogby Interactive Kerry -49, Bush +6 Kerry -25, Bush +16
Calculated National Result Bush +1.4%,Kerry -0.4%


Kentucky
Electoral Votes: 8
2000 Result
Bush 57%
Gore 41%

Background: Johnson, Carter (first time) and Clinton (twice) carried the Bluegrass state. Nixon (twice), Reagan (twice) and both Bushes won here. It is very likely that Clinton would not have carried Kentucky either time if not for Perot. In 1992 Clinton won by three points with Perot capturing 13%, and in 1996 Clinton won by 1% with Perot capturing 9%.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
10/23/03 Associated Press Link LV 4% Bush 47% Unnamed Democrat 29% Bush +18
2/4/04 Courier Journal NA LV 4% Bush 55% Unnamed Democrat 38% Bush +17
2/16/04 Survey USA Link LV 3.8% Bush 57% Kerry 41% Bush +16
5/11/04 Bluegrass Poll Link 811 Adults 3.4% Bush 52% Kerry 40% Bush +12
5/20/04 Garin Hart Yang (D) Link RV 5% Bush 49% Kerry 43% Bush +6
6/8/04 Survey USA Link 669 LV 4% Bush 52% Kerry 39% Bush +13
7/26/04 Survey USA Link 690 LV 4% Bush 52% Kerry 42% Bush +10
8/15/04 Survey USA Link 697 LV 4% Bush 56% Kerry 39% Bush +17

Punditry: There are states he won in 2000 that the President needs to worry about in 2004. Kentucky is not one of them. It remains a Strong Advantage for Bush. Senator Bunning, who some Democrats felt was vulnerable this cycle, is ahead by even more.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 11:02 am, 08/17/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


North Carolina
Electoral Votes: 15
2000 Result
Bush 56%
Gore 43%

Background: Since Lyndon Johnson's win here, only once have the Democrats taken Tar Heel electors. That's a bit deceptive, however, as many times it was extremely close. Carter lost to Reagan here by only two points in that nationwide blowout. Clinton lost two elections by a combined total of 5%. Yet the Clinton losses are also deceptive, in that the margins would have been considerably larger without Perot and his charts. Simply stated, like much of the south North Carolina votes Republican for President, although a southerner atop the ticket can make things interesting; not always though, as Al Gore demonstrated.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
9/16/03 Research2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 51% Edwards 40% Bush +11
11/15/03 Research2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 54% Edwards 42% Bush +12
11/25/03 Survey USA Link 563 RV 4.2% Bush 53% Kerry 39% Bush +14
11/25/03 Survey USA Link 563 RV 4.2% Bush 52% Edwards 45% Bush +7
2/26/04 Survey USA Link 654 RV 3.9% Bush 53% Kerry 42% Bush +11
3/11/04 Rasmussen Link 400 LV 3% Bush 51% Kerry 43% Bush +8
4/1/04 Bennett, Petts and Blumenthal (D) No Lik LV 4% Bush 51% Kerry 44% Bush +7
5/12/04 Mason-Dixon Link LV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 41% Bush +7
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 48% Kerry 44% Bush +4
6/16/04 Research2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 47% Kerry 42% Bush +5
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 49% Kerry 42% Bush +7
7/12/04 Gallup Link 680 LV 5% Bush 56% Kerry 41% Bush +15
7/12/04 Mason-Dixon Link LV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 45% Bush +3
7/14/04 Research2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 49% Kerry 44% Bush +5
7/22/04 Fairbanks, Maslin, Maulin, and Associaties (D) Link 600 LV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 44% Bush +4
7/26/04 SurveyUSA Link 906 LV 3% Bush 51% Kerry 44% Bush +7
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 50% Kerry 45% Bush +5
8/11/04 Research 2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 45% Bush +3
8/15/04 SurveyUSA Link 592 LV 4% Bush 51% Kerry 45% Bush +6

Punditry: Barely changed from SurveyUSA's poll of a month ago, the 6 point margin leaves North Carolina as Leaning Towards Bush. Bush's margin of lead is bigger among those who are probable to vote as compared to certain to vote. Kerry leads among the young but trails among all other age groups. Kerry has monopolized the black vote, with Bush attracting just 6%. Each one of these indicate that Kerry will have difficulty going over the top in his running mate's home state. However, since the Democrat candidates for Senate and for Governor are leading in the same poll, it could be doable; North Carolinans are not reflexively Republican.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 10:49 am, 08/17/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Maryland
Electoral Votes: 10
2000 Result
Gore 57%
Bush 40%

Background: Since the 1960 election, the only Republicans to carry Maryland were Nixon for his re-elect, Reagan for his re-elect, and George H. W. Bush during his first campaign. Clinton did not need Perot to win here either time. This is a Democrat state.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
1/12/04 Potomac, Inc Link 1,200 LV 2.8% Bush 41% Unnamed Democrat 51% Dem +10
2/8/04 Gonzalez Link 818 RV 3.5% Bush 40% Kerry 51% Kerry +11
2/27/04 Mason-Dixon Link 625 LV 4% Bush 38% Kerry 47% Kerry +9
3/24/04 Gonzales Research and Marketing Link 825 LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
6/9/04 Gonzales Research and Marketing Link LV 4% Bush 38% Kerry 52% Kerry +14
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 39% Kerry 53% Kerry +14
8/15/04 Gonzales Research and Marketing Link 847 LV 4% Bush 40% Kerry 53% Kerry +13

Punditry: Strong Advantage for Kerry, and changed little from two months ago when Gonzales last polled Maryland. Bush's approval gap is just three points; even if he were to get all of those who approve of his performance he still would not be in the ballpark.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 11:28 am, 08/17/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Georgia
Electoral Votes: 15
2000 Result
Bush 55%
Gore 43%

Background: Wallace and Goldwater won here. The only times the Democrats have carried this state since 1960 have been when native son Jimmy Carter was topping the ticket (twice) and when fellow southerner Bill Clinton beat that Yankee George H.W. Bush by a point, while Texan H. Ross Perot siphoned off 13% of the vote. This is not a friendly state for Democrats in Presidential elections, as even Bob Dole won here over Clinton despite Perot taking 7%.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
10/15/03 Zogby Link 400 LV 4.5% Bush 52% Unnamed Democrat 39% Bush +13
10/23/03 Shapiro Research Group Link RV 4.5% Bush 49% Unnamed Democrat 41% Bush +8
2/4/04 Shapiro Research Group NA RV 4.5% Bush 47% Unnamed Democrat 44% Bush +3
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 51% Kerry 39% Bush +12
6/2/04 Insider Advantage Link RV 5% Bush 49% Kerry 32% Bush +17
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 52% Kerry 41% Bush +11
7/11/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 RV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 51% Kerry 40% Bush +11
801 RV, Nader an option 4% Bush 51% Kerry 38% Bush +13
8/2/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 52% Kerry 43% Bush +9
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 52% Kerry 41% Bush +11
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 53% Kerry 42% Bush +11
8/17/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 54% Kerry 40% Bush +14
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 54% Kerry 38% Bush +16

Punditry: Bush actually attracts more support in Georgia than approves his job performance. Strong Advantage for Bush.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 6:59 am, 08/18/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Wisconsin
Electoral Votes: 10
2000 Result
Gore 47.83%
Bush 47.61%

Background: I got the *BLEEP* kicked out of me in Wisconsin. Oh wait, sorry. Stripes flashback. Reagan won here twice. Nixon won here three times. LBJ and Carter (against Ford) won here, and then the Democrats have taken the last four elections here. The first of Clinton's wins would have been a loss for him without Perot.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
5/03 Badger Poll Link Adults 4% Bush 53% Unnamed Democrat 42% Bush +11
10/28/03 Badger Poll Link Adults 4% Bush 46% Unnamed Democrat 45% Bush +1
1/27/04 Badger Poll Link Adults 4% Bush 38% Unnamed Democrat 54% Dem +16
3/24/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 43% Unnamed Democrat 46% Kerry +3
3/31/04 Badger Poll Link 500 Adults, Nader not an option 4% Bush 47% Kerry 41% Bush +6
500 Adults, Nader an option 4% Bush 49% Kerry 45% Bush +4
4/21/04 Wisconsin Public Radio / St. Norbert College Survey Center Link 358 RV 5% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
4/28/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV, Nader not an option 4.5% Bush 42% Kerry 50% Kerry +8
500 LV, Nader an option 4.5% Bush 41% Kerry 45% Kerry +4
4/28/04 Badger Poll Link 511 Adults 4.5% Bush 50% Kerry 38% Bush +12
5/9/04 Lake, Snell, Perry & Associates (D) L ink ? ? Bush 40% Kerry 49% Kerry +9
6/8/04 LA Times Link 694 RV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 42% Bush +2
6/23/04 Badger Poll Link 504 Adults, Nader an option 4% Bush 46% Kerry 42% Bush +4
7/12/04 Center for Survey Research and Analysis Link 575 RV, two man race 4% Bush 48.4% Kerry 45.9% Bush +2.5
575 RV, four man race 4% Bush 46.1% Kerry 44.6% Bush +1.5
7/13/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 45% Kerry 48% Kerry +3
801 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 45% Kerry 48% Kerry +3
7/15/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 42% Kerry 48% Kerry +6
8/2/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 46% Kerry 49% Kerry +3
801 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 46% Kerry 47% Kerry +1
8/17/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 46% Kerry 47% Kerry +1
801 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 46% Kerry 46% Push

Punditry: Slight Advantage for Kerry. Bush's disapproval numbers continue to be very low comparatively to the rest of the country, which makes Wisconsin a state where the polling after the Republican convention will be particularly worth noting.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 7:14 am, 08/18/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Washington
Electoral Votes: 11
2000 Result
Gore 50%
Bush 45%

Background: The Democrats have won the last four, and 6 of the last 10, with all four Republican wins coming consecutively (Nixon, Ford, ReaganX2). It is unclear as to if Clinton would have won the first time here sans Perot; it would likely have been extremely close. The Dukakis/Bush race was very close. The Clinton/Dole race was not.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
1/5/04 SurveyUSA NA 975 RV 3% Bush 48% Kerry 49% Kerry +1
2/4/04 SurveyUSA Link 975 RV 3% Bush 43% Kerry 55% Kerry +12
3/24/04 SurveyUSA Link 698 LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 47% Kerry +4
3/25/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 5% Bush 44% Kerry 50% Kerry +6
4/5/04 The Elway Poll NA LV 5% Bush 41% Kerry 46% Kerry +5
4/18/04 Moore Information (R) Link 500 RV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 45% Kerry +4
6/4/04 SurveyUSA Link 654 LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 49% Kerry +5
6/11/04 Moore Information (R) Link 500 RV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 45% Kerry +1
6/11/04 Mason-Dixon** Link 625 LV 4% Bush 42% Kerry 46% Kerry +4
6/24/04 Moore Information (R) NA 500 RV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 43% Push
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 41% Kerry 50% Kerry +9
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 44% Kerry 50% Kerry +6
8/2/04 SurveyUSA Link 585 LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 51% Kerry +8
8/11/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 42% Kerry 51% Kerry +9
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
8/17/04 SurveyUSA Link 602 LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 51% Kerry +8
** Done for a 'private public policy client'.

Punditry: No change in Washington fom the previous SurveyUSA poll, and Washington is firmly entrenched in the Leaning Towards Kerry column.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 8:57 pm, 08/18/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Missouri
Electoral Votes: 11
2000 Result
Bush 50%
Gore 47%

Background: Considered by many to be a bellwether state, Missouri has gone Republican in every election after 1964 except for three. Jimmy Carter beat Gerald Ford by a small, four point margin. Bill Clinton won the state twice, but both times relied on Perot taking double digits (over 20% in the first). From 1968 on, the only Democrat to break 50% in Missouri was Carter, and the only Republican to fail to get 50% absent a truly strong third party candidate was Ford.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
9/9/03 Research 2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 49% Dick Gephardt 39% Bush +10
1/29/04 Research 2000 Link 804 LV 4% Bush 45% Unnamed Democrat 40% Bush +5
2/14/04 Decision Research (D) NA LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 49% Kerry +3
3/2/04 Suffolk University Link LV 4% Bush 50% Kerry 39% Bush +11
3/19/04 Decision Research (D) NA LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 49% Kerry +3
3/23/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 49% Kerry 42% Bush +7
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 44% Kerry 43% Bush +1
6/8/04 LA Times Link 566 RV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 37% Bush +11
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 48% Kerry 44% Bush +4
7/8/04 SurveyUSA Link 755 LV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 46% Bush +2
7/20/04 Market Research Institute Link 600 RV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 46% Kerry +2
7/22/04 Research2000 Link 802 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 45% Kerry 48% Kerry +3
802 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 45% Kerry 47% Kerry +2
7/22/04 Gallup Link 636 LV, Nader not an option 5% Bush 48% Kerry 48% Push
636 LV, Nader an option 5% Bush 47% Kerry 47% Push
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 50% Kerry 46% Bush +4
8/18/04 SuveyUSA Link 643 LV 5% Bush 48% Kerry 47% Bush +1

Punditry: I hate leaving a state at Tossup, but that is what I am doing. Bush wins comfortably among certain voters, but in those who are just probable, Kerry has a substantial lead; it works out to the one point margin shown above.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 9:11 pm, 08/18/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


F Connecticut
Electoral Votes: 7
2000 Result
Gore 56%
Bush 38%

Background: 3-5-3 in the last 11 Presidential elections, with Clinton's first being probably due to the Perot factor.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
3/11/03 Quinnipiac Link RV 3% Bush 37% Unnamed Democrat 51% Dem +14
7/31/03 Quinnipiac Link RV 3% Bush 37% Unnamed Democrat 51% Dem +14
2/26/04 University of Connecticut Link 448 RV 4% Bush 36% Kerry 49% Kerry +13
3/28/04 University of Connecticut Link RV 4% Bush 33% Kerry 52% Kerry +19
4/27/04 University of Connecticut Li nk 501 RV 4% Bush 33% Kerry 51% Kerry +18
6/1/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,035 RV 3% Bush 36% Kerry 46% Kerry +10%
6/28/04 Quinnipiac Link 929 RV 3% Bush 32% Kerry 50% Kerry +18%
8/17/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,079 RV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 40% Kerry 48% Kerry +8%
1,079 RV, Nader an option 3% Bush 38% Kerry 45% Kerry +7%

Punditry: I should have resisted the temptation last time and kept Connecticut at Strong Advantage for Kerry. The new Quinnipiac poll shows quite a different result than has been obtained previously, and if true would make Connecticut marginally competitive. The internals are less kind to the President, though. His approval gap is a mere 2 points, his disapproval rating is above 50%, and Kerry voters say there is no chance they will reconsider at a higher rate than Bush supporters. There is a large amount of undecideds, so perhaps things could get more interesting than I had thought. I would not count on it though; if Connecticut ends up being competitive then the entire race will have completely changed long before we get there.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 9:00 am, 08/19/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Iowa
Electoral Votes: 7
2000 Result
Gore 48%
Bush 46%

Background: Iowa is a state of streaks, going 1-5-4 over the last 10. Clinton would likely have lost his first campaign against Bush had Perot not been a factor. The state is generally close, with the only surprisingly large margin coming when Dukakis beat Bush by 10 points.

Iowa rated a slight advantage to Bush in the first ECB of 2000. This time, it rates a slight advantage to the Democrats. Other positions in Iowa are mixed. The Republicans hold 4 of the 5 House seats, and the Senate seats are split. The Republicans control both chambers of the state legislature, but the Democrats hold all major executive offices except for Auditor. Republicans hold a 32% to 29% advantage in registration.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
9/12/03 Des Moines Register Link 803 Adults 3.5% Bush 41% Unnamed Democrat 41% Even
10/30/03 Research 2000 Link LV 4% Bush 46% Unnamed Democrat 47% Dem +1
1/5/04 Research 2000 Link LV 4% Bush 50% Unnamed Democrat 42% Bush +8
2/11/04 Selzer & Co. NA RV 3.4% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
3/23/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 41% Kerry 51% Kerry +10
4/21/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 47% Kerry +1
5/25/04 Research 2000 Link 604 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
604 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 42% Kerry 46% Kerry +4
5/27/04 SurveyUSA Link 794 LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 48% Kerry +3
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 41% Kerry 49% Kerry +8
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 44% Kerry 48% Kerry +4
7/12/04 Center for Survey Research and Analysis Link 614 RV, two man race 4% Bush 45.7% Kerry 50.4% Kerry +4.7
614 RV, four man race 4% Bush 44.4% Kerry 47.7% Kerry +3.3
7/21/04 Selzer & Co. Link LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 45% Bush +1
7/23/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 641 LV 3% Bush 46% Kerry 48% Kerry +2
7/28/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 46% Push
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 45% Kerry 48% Kerry +3
8/3/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 46% Kerry 49% Kerry +3
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 46% Kerry 48% Kerry +2
8/18/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 47% Kerry 49% Kerry +2
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 47% Kerry 48% Kerry +1

Punditry: No real change indicated by Strategic Vision, and Iowa remains a Slight Advantage for Kerry. Bush has a net approval rating of +10 in Iowa, which if true suggests that he may be able to get a decent convention bounce in Iowa.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 10:07 am, 08/19/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Minnesota
Electoral Votes: 10
2000 Result
Gore 48%
Bush 46%

Background: Nixon (against McGovern) is the only Republican winner since Ike. Reagan (against Carter) and Bush (against Gore) made it close, and it is possible that Dole could have beaten Clinton sans Perot. The Reagan race that was close was notable because it was against the homestate Mondale.

The slight advantage for the Democrats is a step up from the leaning Gore position at the start of ECB 2000. Minnesota's legislative seats are split right down the middle. Half of the Representatives, half of the Senate seats, and one of the state legislative chambers are held by each party. Most of the important executive branch offices are held by Republicans with the exception of Attorney General.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
1/26/04 Mason-Dixon NA LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 43% Kerry +2
3/25/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 44% Kerry 47% Kerry +3
4/2/04 Star-Tribune Minnesota Poll Link 562 LV 4.1% Bush 38% Kerry 50% Kerry +12
5/26/04 Mason-Dixon Link 625 LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 44% Kerry +3
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
6/14/04 Public Opinion Strategies (R) NA LV 3.5% Bush 42.2% Kerry 46.5% Kerry +4.3
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 41% Kerry 50% Kerry +9
7/12/04 Center for Survey Research and Analysis Link 589 RV, two man race 4% Bush 45.8% Kerry 49.0% Kerry +3.2
589 RV, four man race 4% Bush 44.2% Kerry 46.5% Kerry +2.3
7/16/04 Mason-Dixon Link 625 LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 45% Kerry +1
7/24/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 47% Kerry 48% Kerry +1
801 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 47% Kerry 47% Push
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
8/3/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 45% Kerry 49% Kerry +4
801 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 45% Kerry 47% Kerry +2
8/18/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 44% Kerry 49% Kerry +5
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 44% Kerry 47% Kerry +3

Punditry: A very slight improvement for Senator Kerry in Minnesota, but still within the Slight Advantage for Kerry range. The President still has a small net positive approval rating in Minnesota, which is good for him, but his approval gap is just a single point, which is not.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 10:16 am, 08/19/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Ohio
Electoral Votes: 20
2000 Result
Bush 50%
Gore 46%

Background: Since Truman, Ohio has gone Democrat four times. LBJ crushed Goldwater, Carter edged Ford by an extremely slim margin, and Clinton won twice, both times relying on Perot heavily.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
2/7/03 Ohio Poll Link RV 4% Bush 59% Unnamed Democrat 36% Bush +23
9/19/03 Ohio Poll Link RV 4% Bush 57% Kerry 38% Bush +19
3/16/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 41% Kerry 45% Kerry +4
3/24/04 Ohio Poll Link 632 RV 3.9% Bush 44% Kerry 46% Kerry +2
4/2/04 Columbus Dispatch Link 3,344 RV 2% Bush 46% Kerry 45% Bush +1
5/13/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
5/25/04 Mason-Dixon Link 1500 RV 3% Bush 47% Kerry 41% Bush +6
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 44% Bush +2
6/8/04 LA Times Link 722 RV 4% Bush 42% Kerry 45% Kerry +3
6/23/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 49% Kerry +6
6/23/04 Fox Opinion Dynamics Link 750 RV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 41% Bush +4
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 44% Bush +4
7/19/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 43% Bush +5
7/22/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 47% Kerry +2
7/22/04 Gallup Link 639 LV, Nader not an option 5% Bush 45% Kerry 51% Kerry +6
639 LV, Nader an option 5% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
7/23/04 Columbus Dispatch Link 3,047 RV 2% Bush 47% Kerry 44% Bush +3
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 46% Kerry +1
8/3/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 49% Kerry 45% Bush +4
801 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 49% Kerry 44% Bush +5
8/11/04 American Research Group Link LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 48% Kerry +3
8/15/04 Gallup Link 628 LV 5% Bush 46% Kerry 48% Kerry +2
8/17/04 Ohio Poll Link 812 LV 5% Bush 46% Kerry 48% Kerry +2
8/18/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 49% Kerry 46% Bush +3
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 49% Kerry 45% Bush +4

Punditry: The new entry here is the University of Cincinnati poll, which matches Gallup's result from just a few days earlier. Nader gets just 1% in this poll. Slight Advantage for Kerry remains the designation.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 10:56 am, 08/19/2004
Permalink | Comments (2)


California
Electoral Votes: 55
2000 Result
Gore 53%
Bush 42%

Background: On a three election streak for the Democrats, California has a reputation as a liberal bastion. While Gore did handle Bush easily in 2000, the fact is that the reputation may not fit the data on the Presidential level. Only three candidates have broken 53% in California since the 1964 landslide. Al Gore last time, homestate icon Ronald Reagan in his re-election campaign but not his first election, and Richard Nixon in his re-election campaign but not his first successful Presidential campaign.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
8/16/03 Field NA RV 4% Bush 42% Unnamed Democrat 47% Dem +5
8/16/03 Public Policy Institute NA LV 3% Bush 40% Unnamed Democrat 45% Dem +5
1/3/04 Public Policy Institute Link LV 3% Bush 45% Unnamed Democrat 45% Tied
1/13/04 Field NA RV 3.4% Bush 46% Unnamed Democrat 47% Dem +1
1/18/04 Rasmussen NA LV 4% Bush 41% Unnamed Democrat 46% Dem +5
2/13/04 Knowledge Networks Link RV 4.1% Bush 38% Kerry 42% Dem +4
2/16/04 Public Policy Institute Link 1,103 LV 3% Bush 37% Kerry 54% Dem +17
2/22/04 LA Times Link 1,521 RV 3% Bush 40% Kerry 53% Dem +13
2/27/04 Knowledge Networks Link 505 RV 3.8% Bush 38% Kerry 43% Kerry +5
3/11/04 Rasmussen Link 455 LV 5% Bush 44% Kerry 53% Kerry +9
4/17/04 Rasmussen Link 502 LV 5% Bush 40% Kerry 51% Kerry +11
4/21/04 L.A. Times Link 1,265 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 39% Kerry 49% Kerry +10
4/21/04 L.A. Times Link 1,265 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 41% Kerry 53% Kerry +12
5/6/04 SurveyUSA Link 635 LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 46% Kerry +1
5/24/04 Field Link 647 RV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 40% Kerry 55% Kerry +15
5/24/04 Field Link 647 RV, Nader an option 4% Bush 39% Kerry 51% Kerry +12
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 3% Bush 41% Kerry 49% Kerry +8
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 3% Bush 38% Kerry 52% Kerry +14
7/12/04 Public Policy Institute of California Link 1,378 LV 3% Bush 38% Kerry 49% Kerry +11
7/22/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 41% Kerry 52% Kerry +11
7/25/04 SurveyUSA Link LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 53% Kerry +12
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 3% Bush 37% Kerry 55% Kerry +18
8/4/04 Field Link 633 LV 3.4% Bush 41% Kerry 53% Kerry +12
8/11/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 41% Kerry 53% Kerry +12
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 40% Kerry 50% Kerry +10
8/11/04 Public Policy Institute Link LV 3% Bush 38% Kerry 54% Kerry +16
8/18/04 SurveyUSA Link 589 LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 49% Kerry +3

Punditry: This is twice this election cycle where SurveyUSA has had the California race neck-and-neck. In between, but they and others have shown Kerry up by substantial amounts. This poll seems to have vastly oversampled Republicans. Kerry does better among Republicans than Bush does among Democrats, Kerry is winning among Independents, yet it is just a three point race? Not likely. The poll's internals show that the sample had more Republicans than Democrats; in 2000 the turnout was 45% D, 34% R according to the VNS exit poll. SurveyUSA obviously does not stratify by party affiliation, so they must have either just had an outlying sample, or for whatever reason at the time they polled Republicans were jazzed to turnout, or Democrats were particularly unenthused. Either way, I will be very surprised if we see more polls showing the same thing any time soon. Strong Advantage for Kerry.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 7:44 pm, 08/19/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Oklahoma
Electoral Votes: 7
2000 Result
Bush 60%
Gore 38%

Background: Republicans have won every election here since LBJ.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
3/1/04 Wilson Research NA 300 RV 5.7% Bush 50% Kerry 40% Bush +10
4/1/04 Insider Advantage Link 400 Residents 5% Bush 47% Kerry 35% Bush +12
5/20/04 Wilson Research Link 500 RV 4% Bush 53% Kerry 34% Bush +19
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 58% Kerry 34% Bush +24
6/23/04 SurveyUSA Link 651 LV 4% Bush 60% Kerry 34% Bush +26
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 63% Kerry 31% Bush +32
7/12/04 KOTV and Tulsa World Link LV 5% Bush 59% Kerry 35% Bush +24
7/29/04 Basswood Research (R) Link 600 LV 4% Bush 56% Kerry 36% Bush +20
8/18/04 SurveyUSA Link 596 LV 5% Bush 57% Kerry 38% Bush +19

Punditry: Still Safe for Bush. Coburn leads Carson by just four. Coburn leads among certain voters, while those who are just probable favor Carson.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 7:55 pm, 08/19/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


South Carolina
Electoral Votes: 8
2000 Result
Bush 57%
Gore 41%

Background: Jimmy Carter, from neighboring Georgia, won this state. You have to go back to JFK to find another Democrat who was able to do it. Most of the time, it was not all that close although Carter did make it close against Reagan too; the fact that a neighbor was able to twice make the state competitive (and once win it) means that the state will merit more attention should Edwards win the Democrat nomination.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
7/28/03 Hickman Research Link ? ? Bush 52% Unnamed Democrat 36% Bush +16
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 49% Kerry 39% Bush +10
6/29/04 Public Opinion Strategies (R) NA LV 4% Bush 55% Kerry 40% Bush +15
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 53% Kerry 36% Bush +17
7/12/04 SurveyUSA Link 710 LV 5% Bush 51% Kerry 44% Bush +7
8/18/04 SurveyUSA Link 727 LV 4% Bush 53% Kerry 42% Bush +11

Punditry: Strong Advantage for Bush. Surprisingly, DeMint is beating Tenenbaum by even more (52-39).

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 8:02 pm, 08/19/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Florida
Electoral Votes: 27
2000 Result
Bush 48.85%
Gore 48.84%

Background: Despite the best efforts of the results-oriented Florida Supreme Court, Bush held on to win the state in 2000, just as nearly every recount conducted afterwards validated. Did you know that since 1948, though, that only three times has Florida gone for the Democrat candidate? Johnson got 51%, Carter got 52%, and Clinton (2nd term) got 48% (with Perot taking 9%). More times than not, the Republican has come closer to 60%. Why Bush underperformed here to such a degree is something his campaign must rectify.

In the first ECB of 2000, Florida was listed as a battleground with a slight advantage to Gore. This time around, it is starting with a slight advantage for Bush. Florida has 6 Democrat Representatives and 18 Republicans. Both chambers of the state legislature are controlled by the Republicans. Republicans control most of the executive branch. However, both Senate seats are held by Democrats. As of Dec. 1, 2003, the state registration was 41.9% Democrat and 38.6% Republican.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
4/29/03 Mason-Dixon Link</ td> RV 5% Bush 53% Unnamed Democrat 38% Bush +15
12/3/03 Schroth & Associates Link 800 RV 3.5% Bush 43% Unnamed Democrat 37% Bush +6
1/15/04 Rasmussen Reports Link LV 5% Bush 47% Unnamed Democrat 45% Bush +2
2/27/04 Research 2000 Link 500 LV 4% Bush 47% Kerry 42% Bush +5
3/4/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 45% Kerry +1
3/4/04 Schroth & Associates Link 800 RV 3.5% Bush 43% Kerry 49% Kerry +6
3/14/04 Rasmussen Link 400 LV 5% Bush 45% Kerry 48% Kerry +3
4/1/04 Mason-Dixon Link 625 RV 4% Bush 51% Kerry 43% Bush +8
4/13/04 Rasmussen Reports Link 500 LV 5% Bush 46% Kerry 47% Kerry +1
4/21/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 45% Bush +1
5/9/04 Hamilton, Beattie and Staff (D) Link 1000 LV 3% Bush 47% Kerry 50% Kerry +3
5/19/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 47% Kerry 46% Bush +1
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 46% Push
6/14/04 SurveyUSA Link 723 LV 4% Bush 50% Kerry 43% Bush +7
6/23/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 47% Kerry +1
6/23/04 Fox Opinion Dynamics Link 750 RV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 38% Bush +10
6/27/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,209 RV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 44% Kerry 46% Kerry +2
1,209 RV, Nader an option 3% Bush 43% Kerry 43% Push
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
7/12/04 SurveyUSA Link LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 47% Kerry +3
7/15/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 47% Kerry +3
7/15/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link LV 3% Bush 48% Kerry 46% Bush +2
7/20/04 Insider Advantage Link LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 46% Push
7/19/04 Research2000 Link 600 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 44% Kerry 49% Kerry +5
600 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 44% Kerry 47% Kerry +3
7/21/04 LA Times Link 729 RV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 44% Bush +1
7/21/04 Mason-Dixon Link 625 LV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 46% Bush +2
7/22/04 Gallup Link 699 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 50% Kerry 47% Bush +3
699 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 50% Kerry 46% Bush +4
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 47% Kerry +2
8/4/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 48% Kerry 48% Push
801 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 48% Kerry 47% Bush +1
8/5/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 50% Kerry +7
8/10/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,094 RV, Nader Not An Option 3% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
1,094 RV, Nader An Option 3% Bush 41% Kerry 47% Kerry +6
8/18/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader Not An Option 3% Bush 46% Kerry 48% Kerry +2
801 LV, Nader An Option 3% Bush 46% Kerry 47% Kerry +1

Punditry: Slightly bette for Kerry than the last Strategic Vision poll, but not as good for him as other recent Florida polls. Rasmussen is also showing things tighter than indicated here. Still, for now I'll leave it as Leaning Towards Kerry, at least until there is a publically available non-partisan poll verifying that.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 7:16 am, 08/20/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Pennsylvania
Electoral Votes: 21
2000 Result
Gore 51%
Bush 46%

Background: Democrats have won this state 6 of the last 10 elections, with the first of Clinton's wins being attributable to Ross Perot being on the ballot (19%). Typically, the races in the Keystone state have been close. Pennsylvania started as leaning Bush last time, but has drifted to where it has a slight advantage for the Democrats. Republicans hold a 12-7 advantage in the numbers of Representatives, and hold both Senate seats. They also hold both chambers of the state legislature. The Democrats hold the major executive branch positions except for Attorney General, and have a significant registration advantage (48%-42%).

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
5/13/03 Quinnipiac Link 952 RV 3.2% Bush 56% Kerry 34% Bush +22
10/9/03 Quinnipiac Link 1,116 RV 3% Bush 50% Kerry 43% Bush +7
11/23/03 Muhlenberg College Link 430 RV 4.7% Bush 47% Kerry 40% Bush +7
12/14/03 Quinnipiac Link 1,092 RV 3% Bush 50% Kerry 42% Bush +8
2/18/04 Quinnipiac Ling 1,356 RV 2.7% Bush 45% Kerry 50% Dem +5
2/22/04 Keystone Poll Link 392 RV 4.9% Bush 46% Kerry 47% Dem +1
3/?/04 Muhlenberg College Link RV ?% Bush ?% Kerry ?% Push
3/3/04 Pennsylvania Public Mind Link 1750 Adults 2.4% Bush 45% Kerry 47% Kerry +2
3/11/04 Survey USA Link 802 RV 3.5% Bush 47% Kerry 49% Kerry +2
3/15/04 Qunnipiac Link 1,022 RV (Nader not given as an option) 3 Bush 44% Kerry 45% Kerry +1
1,022 RV (Nader given as an option) 3% Bush 44% Kerry 40% Bush +4
3/16/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 44% Kerry 45% Kerry +1
3/29/04 Keystone Poll Link 565 RV 4.1% Bush 46% Kerry 40% Bush +6
4/19/04 Quinnipiac Link 769 RV, Nader not an option 3.5% Bush 46% Kerry 42% Bush +4
769 RV, Nader an option 3.5% Bush 45% Kerry 39% Bush +6
4/25/04 Pew Research Link 867 RV 4% Bush 42% Kerry 42% Push
5/3/04 Bennett, Petts, And Blumenthal (D) L ink LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 49% Kerry +6
5/7/04 Susquehanna Polling (R) Link 650 LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 44% Bush +2
5/14/04 Muhlenberg College Link 400 RV 5% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
5/25/04 Quinnipiac Link 701 LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 44% Kerry +3
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 44% Bush +1
6/9/04 SurveyUSA Link 684 LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 47% Kerry +1
6/22/04 Quinnipiac Link 839 RV, Nader an option 3% Bush 43% Kerry 44% Kerry +1
839 RV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 43% Kerry 49% Kerry +6
6/23/04 Fox Opinion Dynamics Link 750 RV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 41% Bush +5
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
7/11/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,157 RV, Nader an option 3% Bush 41% Kerry 46% Kerry +5
1,157 RV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
7/20/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV 3% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
7/21/04 LA Times Link 815 RV 4% Bush 38% Kerry 48% Kerry +10
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 46% Kerry +1
8/2/04 SurveyUSA Link 748 LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 53% Kerry +12
8/4/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 43% Kerry 51% Kerry +8
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
8/15/04 Keystone Poll Link 660 RV 3% Bush 42% Kerry 48% Kerry +6
8/16/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,430 RV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 43% Kerry 48% Kerry +5
1,430 RV, Nader an option 3% Bush 42% Kerry 47% Kerry +5
8/18/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 44% Kerry 49% Kerry +5
801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 44% Kerry 48% Kerry +4

Punditry: Right in line with other Pennsylvania polls, if not a bit more favorable to the Democrats since it is a likely voter poll and not of just registered voters. Pennsylvania is still Leaning Towards Kerry.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 7:25 am, 08/20/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


New Mexico
Electoral Votes: 5
2000 Result
Gore 48%
Bush 48%

Background: No state, not even Florida, was closer in the last election than New Mexico. Prior to Clinton breaking through, the Republicans had carried the state for 6 consecutive elections, often by significant margins. Both times that Clinton carried New Mexico, the Perot vote played a significant factor. The strong showing Perot made here suggests that this is a state concerned with Mexico, both from an immigration perspective and from a jobs perspective.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
9/12/03 Research and Polling Inc. of Albuquerque Link 400 RV 5% Bush 40% Unnamed Democrat 43% Dem +3
3/15/04 Research and Polling Inc. of Albuquerque** Link 400 RV 5% Bush 43% Kerry 44% Kerry +1
4/1/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 46% Kerry 45% Bush +1
4/1/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV, Nader not an option 4% Bush 47% Kerry 47% Push
7/8/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV, Nader an option 4% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
8/4/04 Rasmussen (L) Link 600 LV, Nader not an option, Badnarik an option 5% Bush 43% Kerry 50% Kerry +7
8/15/04 Rasmussen (L) Link 500 LV, Nader not an option, Badnarik an option 5% Bush 46% Kerry 46% Push
8/19/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
** Poll was not exactly a matchup poll, but rather a comparison of the favorability for each.

Punditry: I hate when the numbers look like this. Three of the last four show Kerry up by 7. But one of those was done by a company that now has the race tied. And if we go back further, four of the last seven have the race within a single point of being dead even. It would be nice to get some other polling companies in here to see what they are showing. Given how close NM was in 2000, I am going to keep New Mexico right where I have it: Slight Advantage for Kerry.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 8:33 am, 08/20/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Michigan
Electoral Votes: 17
2000 Result
Gore 51%
Bush 46%

Background: 2-5-3 in the last ten elections. Without Perot, it likely would have been 2-6-2. Since Lyndon Johnson, only Reagan in his re-elect has approached 60%. Michigan has gone from leaning Bush to having a slight advantage for the Democrats. Republicans have 9 of 15 Representatives, Democrats hold both Senate seats, while Republicans hold both houses of the state legislature. The state executive is split; Democrats hold the Governor and Lt. Governor positions while Republicans have the Secretary of State and Attorney General slots.

Michigan has gone from leaning Bush to having a slight advantage for the Democrats. Republicans have 9 of 15 Representatives, Democrats hold both Senate seats, while Republicans hold both houses of the state legislature. The state executive is split; Democrats hold the Governor and Lt. Governor positions while Republicans have the Secretary of State and Attorney General slots.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
5/26/03 Epic/MRA Link 400 RV 5% Bush 48% Unnamed Democrat 41% Bush +7
9/21/03 Detroit News/Mitchell Research Link 600 LV 4% Bush 44% Unnamed Democrat 49% Dem +5
12/10/03 Survey USA Link 724 LV 3.7% Bush 53% Kerry 43% Bush +10
2/3/04 Survey USA Link 724 LV 3.7% Bush 46% Kerry 51% Dem +5
2/22/04 Epic/MRA Link 600 LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 49% Dem +4
3/1/04 Detroit News/Mitchell Research Link LV 4% Bush 40% Kerry 46% Kerry +6
3/14/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 44% Kerry 48% Kerry +4
3/14/04 Marketing Resource Group Link 600 RV 4.1% Bush 47% Kerry 45% Bush +2
4/1/04 Epic/MRA Link 600 LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 47% Kerry +2
4/4/04 Survey USA Link 536 LV 4.3% Bush 41% Kerry 51% Kerry +10
5/2/04 Survey USA Link 536 LV 4.3% Bush 43% Kerry 47% Kerry +4
5/12/04 Detroit News/Mitchell Research Link 413 LV 5% Bush 44% Kerry 40% Bush +4
5/31/04 Survey USA Link 567 LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 47% Kerry +4
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 41% Kerry 47% Kerry +6
6/6/04 Epic/MRA Link 600 LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 47% Kerry +2
6/23/04 Fox Opinion Dynamics Link 750 LV 4% Bush 42% Kerry 40% Bush +2
6/30/04 Survey USA Link 594 LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 51% Kerry +10
6/30/04 Detroit News/Mitchell Research Link 400 LV 5% Bush 44% Kerry 43% Bush +1
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 46% Kerry +2
7/1/04 SurveyUSA Link LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 51% Kerry +10
7/8/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 50% Kerry +7
7/8/04 Epic/MRA Link 600 LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 47% Kerry +3
7/17/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV 3% Bush 44% Kerry 46% Kerry +2
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 50% Kerry +6
8/2/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV 3% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
8/4/04 SurveyUSA Link 608 LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 52% Kerry +11
8/10/04 Epic/MRA Link 600 LV 4% Bush 42% Kerry 49% Kerry +7
8/17/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV 3% Bush 42% Kerry 48% Kerry +6
8/19/04 American Research Group Link 600 LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 48% Kerry +3

Punditry: According to American Research Group, Bush has narrowed the margin between Kerry and himself by four points since just after Edwards was named as Kerry's running mate. The candidates are doing equally well within their own party, and Kerry has a slight edge among independents. Michigan has been floating around the border between slight advantage and Leaning Towards Kerry for quite some time, and I suspect that it will soon be moving back to the tighter designation, but not quite yet. I want another poll to confirm, especially since Rasmussen's premium numbers do not fully mesh with these.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 8:45 am, 08/20/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Colorado
Electoral Votes: 9
2000 Result
Bush 51%
Gore 42%

Background: Colorado is generally considered to be winnable for the Democrats, but historically this has proven to be a solid GOP bastion. Only three times since Franklin Delano Roosevelt was President has a Democrat carried this state (Truman, Johnson, and Clinton against Bush- with a big thanks to Perot taking 23% of the tally).

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
9/8-10/03 Colorado Democratic Party NA RV 4% Bush 42% Unnamed Democrat 35% Bush +7
12/15-16/03 Public Opinion Strategies NA LV 4.9% Bush 46% Unnamed Democrat 36% Bush +10
3/16/04 McLauglin & Associates (R) NA 500 LV 4.5% Bush 46% Kerry 42% Bush +4
4/2/04 Public Opinion Strategies Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 49% Kerry 40% Bush +9
4/14/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 49% Kerry 44% Bush +5
6/18/04 Mason-Dixon Link 500 RV 4% Bush 48% Kerry 43% Bush +5
8/16/04 SurveyUSA Link 622 LV 4% Bush 47% Kerry 47% Push
8/19/04 Rasmussen Link 622 LV 4% Bush 47% Kerry 47% Push

Punditry: Rasmussen comes in and says the same thing that SurveyUSA said-- Colorado is a complete Tossup heading in to the Republican convention. The internals on this poll, while not publically available, make the topline results a bit hard to understand, as they are not very good for Senator Kerry.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 2:23 pm, 08/20/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Nevada
Electoral Votes: 5
2000 Result
Bush 50%
Gore 46%

Background: Since 1964, Nevada has gone Republican every Presidential election except for the two victories by Bill Clinton, both of which were by very small margins (margins which were 1/9th the size of the Perot vote). Most of the other elections were comfortable wins for the GOP.

Nevada was leaning Bush in the first 2000 ECB, and this year rates a slight advantage for Bush. Legislatively, the state is split. Two of the three Representatives are Republicans. The two Senate seats are split. The Democrats control the state Assembly while the Republicans control the state Senate. The Republicans hold most executive branch offices. The registration race is close, with Republicans holding a one point advantage (41%-40%).

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
7/9/03 Mason-Dixon Link RV 4% Bush 51% Unnamed Democrat 23% Bush +28
10/28/03 Magellan Research Link RV 4% Bush 32% Unnamed Democrat 23% Bush +9
12/3/03 Southwest Group Link RV 4% Bush 50% Unnamed Democrat 34% Bush +16
2/13/04 SurveyUSA Link 505 RV 4.5% Bush 49% Kerry 48% Bush +1
3/17/04 Mason-Dixon Link 625 RV 4% Bush 49% Kerry 38% Bush +11
7/22/04 Mason-Dixon Link 625 LV 4% Bush 46% Kerry 43% Bush +3
7/23/04 SurveyUSA Link 801 LV 4% Bush 45% Kerry 49% Kerry +4
8/15/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 5% Bush 47% Kerry 46% Bush +1
8/16/04 SurveyUSA Link 520 LV 4% Bush 49% Kerry 46% Bush +3
8/17/04 Research2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 44% Kerry 42% Bush +2

Punditry: Pretty much the same margin as the SurveyUSA result, but with quite a bit more undecideds. The more undecideds, the more in flux the state is. The article writeup did not include any details to analyze beyond the topline, which is indicative of the state continuing to be a Slight Advantage for Bush.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 8:57 am, 08/23/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


New Jersey
Electoral Votes: 15
2000 Result
Gore 56%
Bush 40%

Background: New Jersey used to be considered a Republican state. Those days have passed, although there are still some signs of life. In the last 10 Presidential elections it has gone 1-6-3 with the Republican wins coming in the middle, the last Clinton win and the Gore win were by such substantial margins that it is hard to avoid the feeling that New Jersey is trending leftward.

If New Jersey remains tight enough to stay in the battleground, it is a case of back to the future. ECB2000 started with it leaning Gore's way. The Democrats have 7 of 13 Representatives and both Senate seats, control both chambers of the state legislature, hold all of the important executive offices, and have a 25%-19% advantage in voter registration.

Polling Data:

Date Polling Company Link Type MOE Republican Democrat Margin
9/8/03 Rutgers Link 802 Adults 3.5% Bush 43% Unnamed Democrat 35% Bush +8
9/15/03 Fairleigh Dickinson University/Public Mind Link 600 RV 4% Bush 36% Unnamed Democrat 29% Bush +7
9/25/03 Quinnipiac Link RV 3.1% Bush 48% Kerry 43% Bush +5
11/10/03 Quinnipiac Link 1,027 RV 3.1% Bush 46% Kerry 43% Bush +3
1/11/04 Fairleigh Dickinson University/Public Mind Link 600 RV 4% Bush 40% Unnamed Democrat 32% Bush +8
1/13/04 Rutgers Link 823 RV 4.2% Bush 41% Unnamed Democrat 38% Bush +3
4/10/04 Fairleigh Dickinson University/Public Mind Link 802 RV, Nader not an option 3.5% Bush 47% Kerry 48% Kerry +1
4/10/04 Fairleigh Dickinson University/Public Mind Link 802 RV, Nader an option 3.5% Bush 48% Kerry 44% Bush +4
4/20/04 Rasmussen Link 500 LV 4.5% Bush 39% Kerry 51% Kerry +12
5/4/04 Rutgers / Eagleton Link 643 RV 4% Bush 37% Kerry 43% Kerry +6
5/16/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,129 RV, Nader not an option 2.9% Bush 44% Kerry 47% Kerry +3
5/16/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,129 RV, Nader an option 3% Bush 43% Kerry 46% Kerry +3
5/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 39% Kerry 51% Kerry +12
6/20/04 Quinnipiac Link 1,167 RV, Nader an option 3% Bush 40% Kerry 46% Kerry +6
6/30/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 41% Kerry 51% Kerry +10
7/26/04 Fairleigh Dickinson University/Public Mind Link 834 RV 4% Bush 43% Kerry 45% Kerry +2
7/28/04 Research2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 40% Kerry 50% Kerry +10
7/30/04 Rutgers / Eagleton Link 624 RV 4% Bush 32% Kerry 52% Kerry +20
7/31/04 Rasmussen Link LV 5% Bush 38% Kerry 51% Kerry +13
8/2/04 Quinnipiac Link 996 RV, Nader an option 3% Bush 36% Kerry 49% Kerry +13
8/9/04 Strategic Vision (R) Link 801 LV, Nader an option 3% Bush 40% Kerry 49% Kerry +9
801 LV, Nader not an option 3% Bush 40% Kerry 52% Kerry +12
8/19/04 Research2000 Link 600 LV 4% Bush 41% Kerry 52% Kerry +11

Punditry: There have been some rumblings that internal polling for the Democrats showed the race here considerably closer after McGreevey's situation burst to the forefront. Research2000's poll shows no indication of this being true. New Jersey remains a Strong Advantage for Kerry.

Posted under:  by Gerry @ 9:06 am, 08/23/2004
Permalink | Comments (0)


Effective National Popular Results: Bush 46.3%, Kerry 46.1%
Kerry Bush
Safe Strong Lean Slight Tossup Slight Lean Strong Safe
DC (3) DE (3) OR (7)
K47-B41
7/31/04
WV (5)
K47-B44
7/28/04
MO (11)
B48-K47
8/17/04
VA (13)
B49-K46
7/31/04
AZ (10)
B48-K45
8/1/04
SD (3)
B50-K35
5/21/04
ND (3)
RI (4)
K49-B25
6/14/04
VT (3)
K51-B36
5/1/04
NH (4)
K49-B42
8/5/04
ME (4)
K48-B44
7/31/04
CO (9)
B47-K47
8/17/04
AR (6)
B46-K46
7/31/04
TN (11)
B48-K46
8/2/04
LA (9)
B54-K38
7/??/04
NE (5)
MA (12)
K56-B30
7/28/04
IL (21)
K54-B39
7/31/04
WA (11)
K51-B43*R
8/17/04
WI (10)
K47-B46*R
8/17/04
- NV (5)
B44-K42
8/17/04
NC (15)
B51-K45
8/15/04
KY (8)
B56-K39
8/15/04
WY (3)
NY (31)
K55-B35*
8/9/04
NJ (15)
K49-B40*R
8/9/04
PA (21)
K49-B44*R
8/18/04
OH (20)
B49-K46*R
8/18/04
- - - GA (15)
B54-K40*R
8/17/04
MS (6)
B61-K30
4/21/04
- HI (4)
K48-B41
8/3/04*
FL (27)
K47-B46*R
8/18/04
IA (7)
K49-B47*R
8/18/04
- - - SC (8)
B53-K42
8/18/04
UT (5)
B67-K22
5/10/04
- MD (10)
K53-B40
8/15/04
MI (17)
K48-B45
8/19/04
MN (10)
K49-B44*R
8/18/04
- - - - MT (3)
B53-K33
5/26/04
- CT (7)
K45-B38*
8/17/04
- NM (5)
K49-B42
8/19/04
- - - - ID (4)
B55-K25
6/14/04
- CA (55)
K49-B46
8/18/04
- - - - - - TX (34)
B55-K37
6/30/04
- - - - - - - - KS (6)
B56-K36
6/30/04
- - - - - - - - AK (3)
B56-K33*R
6/30/04
- - - - - - - - IN (11)
B47-K26*
7/12/04
- - - - - - - - AL (9)
B56-K34
7/28/04
- - - - - - - - OK (7)
B57-K38
8/18/04
Totals
Kerry States Battleground States Bush States
50 118 87 61 20 24 36 43 99
255 105 178

* Indicates a Registered Voter poll as opposed to a Likely Voter poll.
*R Indicates a partisan Republican poll. *D Inidcates a partisan Democrat poll.
** Indicates a poll of either adults or residents.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dales; ecb; ecb2004
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 08/23/2004 6:58:49 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coop; The G Man; nevergiveup; scan58; AuH2ORepublican; BoomerBob; Galatians513; onyx; KJacob; ...

ping


2 posted on 08/23/2004 7:05:15 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dales

The convention will be very interesting.


3 posted on 08/23/2004 7:07:56 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan (A gun owner voting for John Kerry is like a chicken voting for Col. Saunders. (bye bye .30-30))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Someone today posted a piece detailing Kerry's campaign during August. Every day was a disaster in one way or another (except, I think, Aug 12). it began with the no-bounce Convention, then proceeded thru misstep after misstep, and is ending with the growing momentum of the Swift Vets.

And yet Kerry is tied (or ahead) in the polls. My conclusion? Polls aren't worth a darn thing. I say Bush wins this election handily.

4 posted on 08/23/2004 7:10:33 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Do you realize that we have finally reached my "tipping point" in the analysis of polling data..That is defined as when the number of polls surveyed EXCEEDS the number of electoral votes..
5 posted on 08/23/2004 7:18:33 PM PDT by ken5050 (Bill Clinton has just signed to be the national spokesman for Hummer..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

No new state polls in the past 4 days....


6 posted on 08/23/2004 7:18:45 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://www.drunkenbuffoonery.com/mboards/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dales

Gallup just took FL out of your Kerry column. And I will bet on OH being a Bush state in the end, too.


7 posted on 08/23/2004 7:19:11 PM PDT by MrChips (ARD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The Gallup poll out today in Florida that shows W with 2 point lead is big indicator that the tide has turned.


8 posted on 08/23/2004 7:19:52 PM PDT by TheExploited (R-Illinois)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
It isn't John eFing Kerry's military service in Vietnam that counts...

It is what he did when he came home that counts!

9 posted on 08/23/2004 7:21:17 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I just find it funny that when a a poll or two shows Kerry ahead, even by 1%-2%, the state is listed as slight advantage for Lurch. When the state is the same for Bush, it is usually listed as a tossup.

Of course as long as ARG polls are counted, Kerry will always be ahead as they are almost always 5%-15% in favor of the Rats.

10 posted on 08/23/2004 7:24:49 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (I Annoy Buchananites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheExploited

this guy had leaning Kerry w/ a 1% diff? 1% should be toss up...

I am very impressed with Wisc and Mich! Whats up with Mizzou...? Didn't they just all go vote 72% to 28% to save traditional marriage...?


11 posted on 08/23/2004 7:28:35 PM PDT by Republic Rocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dales

I'm getting that sinking feeling....Dammit!! The American people are dumb and dumberer than I can imagine.


12 posted on 08/23/2004 7:29:06 PM PDT by Rhetorical pi2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dales

can you add me to your ping list
thanks


13 posted on 08/23/2004 7:31:03 PM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dales

I keep expecting to see some movement and the only movement I'm seeing is in Kerry's direction. This better be a humdinger of a convention bounce.


14 posted on 08/23/2004 7:33:03 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Let's REALLY Split The Country! (www.righteverytime3.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic Rocker

Unfortunately, being against gay marriage does not make one happy with their economic situation. Barring some unforseen event, pocketbook issues will determine the election.


15 posted on 08/23/2004 7:35:19 PM PDT by buckalfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rhetorical pi2

That's what scares me. I see the stupidity of Americans everyday. The better man has nothing to do with who wins.


16 posted on 08/23/2004 7:35:52 PM PDT by Harris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: buckalfa

Very true. I hope I don't sound too silly saying this, but I strongly believe that the prices we're paying at gas pumps in late October/early November will have more of an impact on this race than anything else.


17 posted on 08/23/2004 8:25:47 PM PDT by richmwill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
There has already been quite a bit of movement. Six new polls out tonight, and the ECB lead for Kerry is down to 50 ev, but in the ECB Classic and Classic sans Zogby Bush is back ahead, as he is in the calculated national result.

The polls are coming out so damn fast this year that my weekly articles are obsolete within hours of being written.

You can find the up-to-date results here.

18 posted on 08/23/2004 9:04:06 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dales

Thanks againg for a superlative job.

At this writing there have been 17 posts to your article and only one assuring us of a landslide for Bush, perhaps reality is finally sinking in. But I think the art in this business is a little like investing in the stock market, the question is not what is going on today or where will the market be tomorrow but where will the market be 6 months from today?

So it is with handicapping this race. I think the important question is whither the trend? In this respect I am more encouraged than when we had all that bluster about a Bush blowout predominating in the reaction to the publication of every poll.

It seems that every state, Florida now included, is returning to its stasis, its 2000 result. It will come down to Florida, Ohio and Wisconsin which, of course, we knew months ago. But most of us also thought that some event would tip it and in the end it would not be close. Maybe, just maybe, the Swift Boat Vets have again rendered their country a service.


19 posted on 08/23/2004 9:04:40 PM PDT by nathanbedford (Attack, repeat, attack... Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

I'm conservative by nature-- both politically and tempermentally. When in doubt, I'll tend to err on the side of caution. Does that tend to paint a worst case picture? Not quite, but it sure does not paint an overly rosy one.


20 posted on 08/23/2004 9:07:04 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson