Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA Senate OKs Sierra Nevada conservancy but beach-smoking ban stalls
Monterey Herald ^ | 8/23/04 | Steve Lawrence - AP

Posted on 08/23/2004 5:52:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

SACRAMENTO - The Senate on Monday approved creation of a state conservancy to protect the majestic Sierra Nevada, but another environmental bill, which would ban smoking on state beaches, stalled as lawmakers began the last days of their 2004 session.

The conservancy bill, by Assemblymen Tim Leslie, R-Tahoe City, and John Laird, D-Santa Cruz, cleared the Senate on a 21-14 vote and was returned to the Assembly, which approved a somewhat different version of the legislation in May.

If the Assembly adopts the Senate changes, the legislation will go to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The beach-smoking bill, by Assemblyman Paul Koretz, D-West Hollywood, fell eight votes short of the bare majority needed for approval on a first roll call, but supporters delayed announcement of the vote to give them time to lobby for more support.

The deadline for action on most bills is Aug. 31, but lawmakers hope to wrap up their 2004 session by Friday to allow Republican legislators to attend the GOP national convention next week in New York.

Leslie and Laird's legislation would create a state conservancy headed by a 13-member board that would be able to buy conservation easements and make grants and loans to other public agencies, nonprofit organizations and Indian tribes for a variety of activities, including protecting ranch land and open space and promoting recreation and tourism, in the Sierra Nevada.

The Sierra conservancy would join eight others, including two that already cover parts of the Sierra or Sierra foothills - the California Tahoe Conservancy and the San Joaquin River Conservancy.

The bill's supporters stressed that the conservancy wouldn't be a land-use regulatory body and would have local input from six Sierra Nevada county supervisors on its board.

"We have conservancies around the state that are designed to protect sensitive areas and serve them," said Sen. Byron Sher, D-Stanford. "They are not designed in any way to interfere with private property rights. They don't take property; they work out arrangements with willing sellers of property."

But Sen. Rico Oller, R-San Andreas, warned that a Sierra conservancy could become something "we who live in the Sierra Nevada will come to regret."

"While today it may protect the rights of private property owners, these things have a way of becoming something else in fact," he said. "I'm very apprehensive about it."

The beach-smoking bill would bar smoking on the sand at state beaches, but allow it in parking lots and campgrounds, unless the local government with jurisdiction over the beach wanted stronger or weaker restrictions.

Sen. Sheila Kuehl, D-Santa Monica, said the bill was an attempt to protect people "who don't want smoke blown in their face" and to "cut down the immense cost of cleaning up our beaches."

Sen. Dennis Hollingsworth, R-La Mesa, said there already is a $1,000 fine for littering. The bill would authorize a $100 fine for smoking. But Kuehl said the littering fine is rarely imposed.

---

On the Net: Read the bills, AB1583 and AB2600, at www.senate.ca.gov


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ab2600; beachsmoking; calgov2002; california; conservancy; environment; senate; sierraconservancy; sierranevada; smokingbans; stalls
"We have conservancies around the state that are designed to protect sensitive areas and serve them," said Sen. Byron Sher, D-Stanford. "They are not designed in any way to interfere with private property rights. They don't take property; they work out arrangements with willing sellers of property."

But Sen. Rico Oller, R-San Andreas, warned that a Sierra conservancy could become something "we who live in the Sierra Nevada will come to regret."

'willing sellers"

1 posted on 08/23/2004 5:52:42 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

fyi


2 posted on 08/23/2004 5:53:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Hairy Kerry now ..... pay thru the nose later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Byron Sher is the same state senator who carried the Yuba River Conservancy bill for a prior Nevada County Supervisor- Who lost big in the last election- because there was no state Senator in the immediate area of the Yuba River/Nevada County who would touch it. Sher lives a LONG way from the land that he is working so hard to control. He is a skunk IMO.
Rico Oller is right- The residents of the Sierra Nevada range will rue the day this bill passes and gets signed. It is a direct attack on private property rights.


3 posted on 08/23/2004 6:02:49 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Senate on Monday approved creation of a state conservancy to protect the majestic Sierra Nevada...

It is pretty majestic...

4 posted on 08/23/2004 6:11:55 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (I used to be schizophrenic, but we're fine now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“The establishment of an American Soviet government will involve the confiscation of large landed estates in town and country, and also, the whole body of forests, mineral deposits, lakes, rivers and so on.” - William Z. Foster, National Chairman of the Communist Party, restating point one of the Communist Manifesto in 1932, “The abolition of private property.”


5 posted on 08/23/2004 6:21:22 PM PDT by sergeantdave (I wasn't there before I was there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I'll have to ping this tomorrow. I'm not on the right hard drive.


6 posted on 08/23/2004 8:41:36 PM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Note who was the first one pinged to this thread.


7 posted on 08/23/2004 8:44:26 PM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
I see that. Having lived in Alaska many years of my life I have an appreciation for where you're coming from. Something like 90% of Alaska if "federal" property.

Alaska want's to develop oil on it's own land...oops, federal land...and a bunch of enviroquacks in Oregon can prevent them. Alaskan's can't buy land, develop land...you know where it's going.

8 posted on 08/23/2004 8:57:29 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

Funny, sounds like the commies want to steal our land, and the nazis want us to quit smoking.

(This is a joke) "America is at that awkward stage - it's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."

Decisions decisions.


9 posted on 08/23/2004 9:21:40 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

No problemo, I need to link this into a couple other threads too.. :-)

I'm pooped out and about to plop as I sit here watching the Olympics.


10 posted on 08/23/2004 9:36:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Hairy Kerry now ..... pay thru the nose later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; calcowgirl; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; forester

Note who was the first one pinged to this thread.


lol..

I forgot to ping the rest of the FoRest folks tho,,

I'm slipping. I need a vacation ... like Rush, except in hawaii or Tahiti. ;-)


11 posted on 08/23/2004 9:45:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Hairy Kerry now ..... pay thru the nose later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
Backgrounder info thread - Sierra Nevada Conservancy

RED ALERT: Socialist agenda being pushed through the California Legislature

12 posted on 08/23/2004 10:04:01 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Hairy Kerry now ..... pay thru the nose later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
"He is a skunk IMO."

Aw, com'on! He's nothing, if not an evil snake!!!

13 posted on 08/23/2004 10:18:07 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Success is still the best revenge... In the land of the free... Because of the brave!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; ElkGroveDan
Thanks for the post, the ping and for pickin the meat right out of the middle. Or, should I say muddle???

"Vee haf ways ov making yew very, VERY villing sellers!"

I have not always admired Rico Oller and his tactics in the past, but he sure has out-shined the guy I used to admire that Rico swaped seats with to become State Senator!!!

My hat's off to him on this one. Even though Leslie's name is on the bill as co-author, he was too ashamed or cowardly to even vote publicly on it. He'll probably have a vote registered after all the publicity dies down. Of course he thought the Recall was a joke, till Arnold jumped in from left field, bringing this crappy CONservancy with him.

14 posted on 08/23/2004 10:28:56 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Success is still the best revenge... In the land of the free... Because of the brave!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
15 posted on 08/24/2004 1:22:13 PM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
They don't take property; they work out arrangements with willing sellers of property."

And they pass AB 2631 in order to regulate you land use so you become a willing seller.

16 posted on 08/24/2004 1:23:48 PM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

BTTT!!!!!!


17 posted on 08/24/2004 1:26:36 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The fact is that the politicians running this don't have voters in the mountain areas, but they do have them on the beaches.


18 posted on 08/24/2004 1:58:34 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson