Posted on 08/23/2004 4:10:46 PM PDT by ken5050
Key question..Kerry has given his wartime journal to Brinkley, said that's why he can't releasde it to the press. Will he be asked to make them public?..or will they all go in the tank
Brinkley has drunk the Kerry Kool-aid. "that schrapnel could have blinded him". "He earned his medals". Oh my! Brinkley's as upset by the Swifties as all the other Kerry hacks.
That is a direct quote from Kerry in Tour of Duty
It means that Gardner is a Fascistic wannabe who wants to destroy the Presidential ambitions of the great white dope, I mean hope from Massachusetts. Ergo, Gardner must be smeared and destroyed. Funny how these people so upset about a Vietnam vet like Kerry being smeared are so quick to smear other Vietnam vets.
wouldn't you LOVE to know what's in the FBI files HRC has on Gergen?
Click the logo to donate to Swift Boat Veterans for Truth!
Brinkley is a elitist snob; what do you think he means by it?
I heard it also..you're correct..BTW.. Heather Naeuwart (sp?) was really good..she took no crap from Gene Sperling..she's got a brain..
OK, I decided to watch Spitball today.
Brinkley joins the "shrapnel in the arm, if it had gone higher would have been in the eye", ergo the purple heart was earned.
Not logical and, in fact, inane, Douglas.
BTW, Major Garrett's report on Fox tonight (during Brit) reported on the first purple heart, which Doug just spoke about. Garrett said that Kerry's own journal 10 days after that incident has an entry that he and his crew had not received any enemy fire yet. Garrett went on to say that someone in the Kerry campaign did concede that MAYBE Kerry's first purple heart was due to an accidentally self-inflicted wound. I hope someone else heard this report.
(I'll add I was disappointed Garrett showed Odell on with Wallace yesterday and the clip where Odell says he has no document to back up an assertion, but Garrett ommitted the rest where Odell goes on to say that he does have 7 eyewitnesses that back him up. Garrett chose the "however one Kerry critic has no evidence to back up his claim" angle when that is not true. Eyewitnesses are used in a court of law!)
He is that author of "Tour of Duty." He should be sweating. Remember how, a week ago, he was, via Drudge, to report that Kerry had been in Cambodia? Never came out publicly though. He's sweating because he knows he's trapped, and probably concerned about his own credibility.
"The New Yorker" was going to give the little worm some space to enlighten us, revise Kerry's Cambodia fairy tale. Brinkley has been a no show.
Or, like .."I ALMOST got all the facts in the book correct, otherwise it'd be fiction.."
Yes, I would. I'd like to smack the CHIT out of him.
reconnaissance...enemy intentions..
Oh, here comes Matthews misconstruing what Malkin said!
And Nancy Boy is appalled.
Matthews: There was guest on the other night, a Michelle Malkin or something.
Yeah like is his arm totally non-functional or can he use his body to swing it in a circle. Matthews is an execrable creep. Instead of dealing with the carnival sideshow that is the Democrat party, he'll piss on the world to protect any idiocy they wish to allege.
I think it means he is an elitist snob who had better not visit South Carolina.LOL!
He can use that excyuse for everything. "I could care less about stretching the truth to get a PH" "I could care less about lying to get a Bronze Star, the war was hell" "I could care less that he lied about atrocities to the Senate, and the public".
There, Kerry is now -FULLY- rehabilitated. In Chrissie's small mind.
Matthews is claiming that Michelle Malkin said that Kerry shot himself.
Buchanan responding on Malkin's behalf. Matthews still frothing at the mouth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.