Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Plans to Build 2nd Nuclear Reactor
NewsMax ^ | 8/22/04 | AP

Posted on 08/22/2004 6:01:03 PM PDT by wagglebee

TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran said Sunday that it plans to build a second nuclear reactor with Russia's help and that at least two other European states have expressed interest in such a project, brushing aside U.S. accusations that the Islamic state wants to build atomic weapons.

Russia is building Iran's first nuclear reactor, which was begun by West Germany but interrupted during the 1979 Islamic revolution. Damage caused to the nearly completed facility in Bushehr during Iran's 1980-88 war with Iraq also led to the postponement of its planned inauguration from 2003 to August 2006.

Despite the delays and the project's $800 million cost, Iranian nuclear officials say they want Russia to build more nuclear reactors to help generate greater amounts of electricity.

The comments Sunday reflect Iran's determination to push ahead with its nuclear program despite U.S. and international concerns that it seeks to develop nuclear weapons.

The United States has been lobbying for the International Atomic Energy Agency to refer Iran's nuclear dossier to the Security Council, which could impose sanctions. Tehran denies seeking to develop weapons.

Asadollah Sabouri, deputy head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, did not say when construction might begin but insisted Russia was obligated to build more than one nuclear reactor under a 1992 agreement between the two countries.

"We have contracts with Russia to build more nuclear reactors. No number has been specified but definitely our contract with Russia is to build more than one nuclear power plant," Sabouri said, adding that Tehran has carried out several studies and technical reports for the construction of new facilities.

Despite U.S. pressure, Russia has been reluctant to abandon the nuclear reactor refit project at Bushehr, a coastal town in southern Iran.

Unaware of Contracts

The spokesman for Russia's Federal Atomic Energy Agency, Nikolai Shingaryov, told The Associated Press by telephone that he was unaware of contracts for Russia to help build any more reactors. He said the two countries have held discussions on building a second one, as called for in the 1992 agreement, but an actual contract would be needed to begin construction.

Sabouri said later that Russia will build a second reactor in Bushehr and that Iran is studying other sites here for more possible reactors. Most areas in Iran are prone to earthquakes, restricting choices for setting up nuclear facilities.

He also said at least two European countries had expressed interest in the projects, but refused to name them.

"They have given us documents expressing their readiness to join the projects. We welcome them. My message to the Europeans is that we have to pass the paperwork stage and go for binding contracts as soon as possible," he said.

Iran insists it is only pursuing nuclear technology to produce electricity.

"By 2021, Iran's electricity consumption will reach 56,000 megawatts and we need to have capability to produce 70,000 megawatts of electricity. Some 7,000 megawatts, about 10 percent, will be met through nuclear power plants," Sabouri said.

Sabouri said the first Bushehr plant is expected to be operational by August 2006. It had initially been scheduled to open in 2003, but Sabouri said repairing damage from the eight-year war with neighboring Iraq, meeting safety regulations and redesigning the reactor has taken longer than expected.

Sabouri said the Bushehr complex has the capacity to house at least four nuclear reactors.

During the Iran-Iraq war, work on a second nuclear reactor in Bushehr was partly completed before it sustained heavy damage during fighting. Sabouri said it was unfeasible to repair and rebuild that facility and Iran planned to construct a new reactor next to it.

Another possible site for building new nuclear reactors would be Darkhovein, a city close to the Arvand River in Khuzestan Province, southwestern Iran, Sabouri added.

He also said Russia must provide Iran with nuclear fuel by the end of 2005 at the latest, or the Bushehr plant's inauguration will be delayed.

Tehran and Moscow have agreed to return the spent nuclear fuel to Russia.

"There is no ambiguity on returning the spent fuel. The Iranian government has already made the decision to return the spent fuel back to Russia. What we haven't agreed on with Russia is the expenses," Sabouri said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iaea; iran; irannukes; nonallyrussia; nuclearreactor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
The comments Sunday reflect Iran's determination to push ahead with its nuclear program despite U.S. and international concerns that it seeks to develop nuclear weapons.

The time to deal with these jihadists is right now, before its too late.

1 posted on 08/22/2004 6:01:03 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Time for Bush to dump the State Department and start exercising some diplomatic muscle.


2 posted on 08/22/2004 6:03:24 PM PDT by sionnsar (Iran Azadi ||| Resource for Traditional Anglicans: trad-anglican.faithweb.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Why doesn't America get with the 21st century and begin adding many new nuclear power plants?

What is wrong with the leaders of this country?

Are they eunuchs?

3 posted on 08/22/2004 6:04:29 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I think we ought to wait a while to destroy them. That way, the French, Germans, and Russians lose even more money when Iran won't pay for their worthless demolished reactors.


4 posted on 08/22/2004 6:07:12 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
And God knows Persian Gulf nations desperately need an electricity source. < /sarc>
5 posted on 08/22/2004 6:08:47 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; faludeh_shirazi; nuconvert; F14 Pilot; DoctorZIn; LibreOuMort
The time to deal with these jihadists is right now, before its too late.

The mullahs ruling Iran are not, I suspect, what I would call "jihadists."

They may be using jihad to further their interests, to further line their very plush nests (born on the backs of the Iranian people), but from what I read I really doubt that they have a complete dedication to Wahhabinist (or other extremist) Islam -- it looks to me like they're just an oligarchy bent on preserving its position of power.

Faludeh and other observers of Iran who likely know more than I, can you comment?

6 posted on 08/22/2004 6:09:07 PM PDT by sionnsar (Iran Azadi ||| Resource for Traditional Anglicans: trad-anglican.faithweb.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
....... build more nuclear reactors to help generate greater amounts of electricity.

And God knows Persian Gulf nations desperately need an electricity source. < /sarc>

7 posted on 08/22/2004 6:09:33 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Iran insists it is only pursuing nuclear technology to produce electricity.

Yes, without the added source of energy Iran most likely couldn't survive.

With it, they won't survive!

Just watch....

8 posted on 08/22/2004 6:09:43 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

Why doesn't America get with the 21st century and begin adding many new nuclear power plants?



Yep, quit burning carbon fuels to make steam, get miles and miles of Willies commuter rail lines, spin the propellers in Chasepeake Bay, start farming them solar arrays, etc.... Regulations took nuclear off the table in the US many moons ago......


9 posted on 08/22/2004 6:11:03 PM PDT by deport ( "fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS; Mr. Mojo

What the hell does Iran need electricity for, I thought the idea behind Islamic fundamentalism was to return to the glorious days of Muhammed in the 8th century.


10 posted on 08/22/2004 6:11:37 PM PDT by wagglebee (Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

They had better start making plans for a third one. The first two are going to be destroyed just before they go "hot".


11 posted on 08/22/2004 6:16:05 PM PDT by JediForce (Never underestimate the power of the Dark side of the Force....keep the blasters' fully charged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediForce

Iran is quickly becoming a target rich environment.


12 posted on 08/22/2004 6:19:07 PM PDT by ProudVet77 (Kerry is Toast du Francai')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: deport
Regulations took nuclear off the table in the US many moons ago......

Yes I know.

But I'm not sitting on my ass and taking it any more!

I'm calling all my reps tomorrow and demanding that they get with the program now!

13 posted on 08/22/2004 6:19:18 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I thought the idea behind Islamic fundamentalism was to return to the glorious days of Muhammed in the 8th century.

Over their dead bodies.

14 posted on 08/22/2004 6:19:50 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Big time.


15 posted on 08/22/2004 6:20:59 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://www.drunkenbuffoonery.com/mboards/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Best to take out the 1st one now.


16 posted on 08/22/2004 6:21:20 PM PDT by b4its2late (John John Kerry Edwards change positions more often than a Nevada prostitute!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
What the hell does Iran need electricity for, I thought the idea behind Islamic fundamentalism was to return to the glorious days of Muhammed in the 8th century.

Exactly! They need the light of Allah, without electricity. We should assist them with this by making them all glow in the dark.

17 posted on 08/22/2004 6:22:50 PM PDT by ExSoldier (M1A: Any mission. Any conditions. Any foe. At any range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Damn Clinton and his lax foreign policy!

Our allies have become opportunistic neutrals intent on making as much money selling dangerous equipment and capabilities to the enemies of Western Civilization.

I'd be so confused if I didn't already know why. Jealousy, money, money, and shortsightedness.


18 posted on 08/22/2004 6:30:20 PM PDT by coconutt2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
He also said at least two European countries had expressed interest in the projects, but refused to name them.

I couldn't possibly hazard a guess at which two countries he's talking about.
19 posted on 08/22/2004 6:31:16 PM PDT by Belisaurius ("Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted" - Joseph Kennedy 1958)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Belisaurius
I couldn't possibly hazard a guess at which two countries he's talking about.

LOL! Well, DUH, me either.

Read your about page. I thought that your screen name is a famous TV Producer who did the show IIRC AirWolf.

20 posted on 08/22/2004 6:37:48 PM PDT by ExSoldier (M1A: Any mission. Any conditions. Any foe. At any range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson