Skip to comments.
'First Americans' May Be Johnnies-Come-Lately (Topper Site)
Atlanta Journal Constitution ^
| 8-20-2004
| Mike Toner
Posted on 08/22/2004 8:17:24 AM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
08/22/2004 8:17:26 AM PDT
by
blam
To: SunkenCiv; NukeMan
GGG Ping
Please go to the site to view the pictures.
2
posted on
08/22/2004 8:18:18 AM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
The earliest immigrants to America may have been Caucasoids? Is that a permissible theory today? Isn't that racist? </sarcasm>
3
posted on
08/22/2004 8:23:53 AM PDT
by
TheGeezer
(If only I had skin as thick as Ann Coulter, and but half her intelligence...)
To: TheGeezer
Yes, it is acceptable.
However, the more neutral 'space aliens' is favored in more progressive circles.
4
posted on
08/22/2004 8:35:07 AM PDT
by
norton
To: blam
Amazing!
5
posted on
08/22/2004 8:36:37 AM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: TheGeezer
The earliest immigrants to America may have been Caucasoids?" I wonder if that means that white people will be allowed to own casinos now?
6
posted on
08/22/2004 8:39:58 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: TheGeezer
The earliest immigrants to America may have been Caucasoids? Is that a permissible theory today? Isn't that racist?Yes, but then as now, illegal immigration will kill them off.
7
posted on
08/22/2004 8:41:02 AM PDT
by
ikka
To: blam
Do you have a link, Blam? It asked me so many personal questions that I skipped looking.
8
posted on
08/22/2004 8:41:24 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: Sam Cree
"Do you have a link, Blam? It asked me so many personal questions that I skipped looking."Try this
I had to answer all the questions too. The pictures don't add anything to the article though.
9
posted on
08/22/2004 8:46:29 AM PDT
by
blam
To: TheGeezer
immigrants to America may have been Caucasoids? Is that a permissible theory today? It is permissible only if it can be conclusively shown that they were not Christian or Republicans.
To: blam
Fiedel says he doesn't question the age of the soils the South Carolina team has been excavating, but he is skeptical that the crudely chipped flakes and points hand-made "microblades" to the archaeologists who see them as ancient tools were fashioned by humans. The same people that think the complexity of humans doesn't indicate "design" are confident that some crudely chipped flakes on some rocks are a clear indicator of "design". Which is it?
11
posted on
08/22/2004 8:51:56 AM PDT
by
RobFromGa
(Kerry/Edwards: Hating America One Vote at a Time)
To: blam
Some Native Americans in the Eastern United States and Canada do have European Mitochondrial DNA, which is only inherited from the mother.
12
posted on
08/22/2004 8:58:37 AM PDT
by
ryanjb2
To: blam
"Lapa Vermelha, Brazil: The skull of a 13,500-year-old female nicknamed Luzia discovered here is the oldest known human skeleton found in the Americas"Luzia looks African
Arlington Springs Woman has now been dated as the oldest American. She was found on an island off the coast of California.
13
posted on
08/22/2004 9:08:01 AM PDT
by
blam
To: ryanjb2
"Some Native Americans in the Eastern United States and Canada do have European Mitochondrial DNA, which is only inherited from the mother." Yup. These 8,000 year old mummies found in Florida have DNA that compares to western Europeans. See article below.
Bye, Bye Beringia
14
posted on
08/22/2004 9:13:07 AM PDT
by
blam
To: ryanjb2
"Make it so!"
To: blam
16
posted on
08/22/2004 11:27:24 AM PDT
by
Veto!
(Kerry wears a tutu, TeRAYza wears the pants)
To: Veto!
17
posted on
08/22/2004 12:21:16 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Another great post, Blam.
I always enjoy your posts. You are a credit to FR. I just clicked on your name. Shouldn't that be Blam!Blam! ?
"Audemus jura nostra defendere" indeed!
To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; A.J.Armitage; abner; adam_az; ...
thanks blam! Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
19
posted on
08/22/2004 7:31:05 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
To: SunkenCiv; blam
To classical archaeology, which teaches that people first entered North America via a land bridge from Siberia around 13,500 years ago and fanned out across the continent, the notion of earlier migrations to the Americas borders on professional heresy. Related question to my reply on a previous thread; what keeps these classical/pseudo(?) scientific types so tightly bound to their theories? I've asked this question several times before and was basically met with shrugs. Somebody knows. Seems to me that when unusual(pronounced irrational) stuff happens, a money trail might be a good place to look for answers. But, whadda I know?
FGS
20
posted on
08/23/2004 1:13:44 PM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson