To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; A.J.Armitage; abner; adam_az; ...
thanks blam! Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
19 posted on
08/22/2004 7:31:05 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
To: SunkenCiv; blam
To classical archaeology, which teaches that people first entered North America via a land bridge from Siberia around 13,500 years ago and fanned out across the continent, the notion of earlier migrations to the Americas borders on professional heresy. Related question to my reply on a previous thread; what keeps these classical/pseudo(?) scientific types so tightly bound to their theories? I've asked this question several times before and was basically met with shrugs. Somebody knows. Seems to me that when unusual(pronounced irrational) stuff happens, a money trail might be a good place to look for answers. But, whadda I know?
FGS
20 posted on
08/23/2004 1:13:44 PM PDT by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson