Posted on 08/22/2004 5:22:12 AM PDT by mondoman
The Islamofascists in Pakistan are intimately tied to the only force holding Pakistan together-the army & intelligence service(ISI).The army started an Islamisation drive under General Zia Ul Haq(Mush's mentor) during the Afghan war of the 1980s.Officers who once learned at Sandhurst & drank whisky now grew long beards & went to devotional gatherings & the ISI (funded by Saudi money) organised various camps for Mujahideen(oops sorry,terrorists)-the various Islamic groupings in Pakistan are the offsprings of that policy.You cannot beat the ISlamofascits without drastically reforming & defanging the army & ISI(Called the "State within the State")-if I'm deeply suspicious about Mush,it is on his commitment to reform the army.
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/agosta/
"A diesel-electrical submarine has to surface to periscope depth to recharge the batteries using the diesel engine, leading to increased risk of detection. The MESMA air-independent propulsion system, being fitted to the Agosta 90B submarines for Pakistan, allows the submarine to remain submerged three times longer. The MESMA system consists essentially of a turbine receiving high-pressure steam from a combustion chamber, burning a gaseous mixture of ethanol and liquid oxygen. The Agosta 90B's performance remains the same in all other respects, except that the length increases from 67m to 76m and submerged displacement from 1,760t to 2,050t"
The Germans use fuel cells tech as their primary source of AIP.
I'd bet its the same hydrogen peroxide system that the Russians used. Its very dangerous...
Nearly 22 years ago. Things change.
"renamed NK missiles"
Painted green & named after a many piece of s***s who plundered & raped in medieval India(with the partial intention of stoking Hindu-Muslim tension in India).
What is really sad about the entire thing is that they name their missiles after folks like Mahmud Ghaur and Ghazni who were from Central Asia. They ravaged the peoples of north-west India --> most likely the ancestors of the present day pakis
Read my Freeper post with a link to learn about Agosta 90-B subs. Google 'Agusta 90-B' yourself if you have real interest:
Well agree with all of your statement but the 16 nuke missile part coz I honestly can't believe it as-
1.The Exocet anti-ship missiles carried on them have no land attack capability(unless it's the Exocet BLK3 variant which is 3years away from being inducted) whatsoever & their small warhead size(About 200kgs) is not ideal for nuke warheads (esp
for a technically deficient nation) + France is yet to test its 'Scalp Navale' sealaunched land attack cruise missile & given it's increasing armssales to India,I don't see the Pakis getting that.
2.Though China is heavily investing in land attack cruise missiles,they have'nt inducted any as such -so a potential sale of a nuke capable variant is a bit far off.
3.The Pakis don't have the technology to develop a land attack cruise missile ,let alone miniaturise a nuke warhead for it.They will have to wait for handouts from the Chinese or North Koreans.Their(Chinese) battlefield ballistic missiles cannot easily be fired from the torpedo tubes of a diesel sub & would be a big escalation as far as Israel & India are compared.
4.The Agosta 90B carries 16 torpedo - tube launched weapons-a combination of torpedoes & missiles.Given India's massive superiority in subs & Surface ships & an American naval presence in the region,equipping it with 16 cruise missiles is well,suicidal.........
Also, Google the sub itself "Agosta 90-B". Pakistan has already tested small nukes suitable for delivery by this sub. The sub is armed with nuke as we speak. Conflict with India does not explain the desire of Paki land to acquire a high tech submarine capable of delivering nuke tipped cruise missles thousands of miles away. Only a U.S. target explains this logically. I just hope Bush and his White House understand the implications of Paki submarines carrying nukes. 'Nuff said.
The new drive system is explained in the body of the link in my initial comments. Although a diesel-electric, the new system allows the diesel to run and recharge batteries while submerged. Running on batteries, ultra quiet.
I agree-the Pakis would love to tip nuke missiles on their subs-the point is which missile are they going to deploy nukes on-a sub needs missiles to carry nukes,doesn't it-so which missile on it is nuketipped-
1.The French Exocet(technically impossible)??
2.US harpoon(which they operate & will recieve more of soon)??
3.Chinese C-801??
& any nuclear cruise missile they can procure won't go beyond 1000kms(only Russia & Israel have nuke tipped cruise missiles with that range & both are fiercely pro-India).If you did'nt know,Pakistan would be wiped out in a Indian second strike using it's French or Russian jets or land based missiles-they DESPERATELY need second strike capability against India.While India is known to have some sort of 2nd strike capability on its Kilo class subs & Surface ships against Pakistan(which may be based on the Russian Club anti-ship/land attack cruise missile or the Israeli Turbo Popeye is which is rumoured to have been sold to India) & is also working on nuclear subs(to deter China).
Pakistan has only 3 such boats now & 4 near obsolete Daphne class subs,while India has 10 kilo class & 4 HDW type209 class subs-beats me why they would use such subs on a suicidal oneway mission all the way to the US??
Having said that US bases in Qatar & Oman & the naval facility at Diego Garcia(off the Maldives island chain) would make tempting targets for such a system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.